2014 in review: The men strike back

Submitted by Matt on Fri, 2015-01-02 13:47

Article here. Excerpt:

'2014 was a watershed year -- it was the year it became apparent to a lot of folks with no personal stake in the issue that gender extremists have gone too far pushing their agendas on sexual assault. There is finally a mainstream backlash against rape culture hysteria. The rape culturalists are still winning, but for the first time, they have prominent opposition.

Rape Culture Hysteria

Before we get to the backlash, it is important to note that the year witnessed an explosion of jaw-dropping "rape culture" hysteria:

Amanda Childress, Sexual Assault Awareness Program coordinator at Dartmouth College, declared that campus policies aren't going far enough to protect students. She asked: "Why could we not expel a student based on an allegation?" Dartmouth defended Childress's comment, noting that she "was asking a question—a provocative one—meant to generate dialogue around complex issues . . . .”

Ms. Magazine quoted Caroline Heldman, a professor at Occidental College, on suits filed by men for alleged violations of their due process rights in connection with sexual assault claims: "These lawsuits are an incredible display of entitlement, the same entitlement that drove them to rape."

Sen. Claire McCaskill circulated an extensive survey about sexual assault to 350 college and university presidents. The survey classified persons who make accusations of sexual misconduct as “victims,” and in one place called persons merely accused of sexual misconduct “offenders.” Then on page 14, it contained this query: "Below is a list of policies and procedures that may discourage victims from disclosing and reporting assaults at some schools . . . . 1. Disclosure of offender’s rights in the adjudication process . . . ." The implication: it is somehow improper to insure that students accused of serious sexual offenses are aware of their rights.'

Like0 Dislike0

Comments

'She asked: "Why could we not expel a student based on an allegation?" Dartmouth defended Childress's comment, noting that she "was asking a question—a provocative one—meant to generate dialogue around complex issues . . . .” '

Only someone with complete disdain for "due process" would ask the question in this way. Getting rid of "due process" is a moronic idea. People such as Childress typically believe they'll never need "due process" or that women have a right to due process but men don't. A lot of feminists believe women should have certain rights that men should not have. After all, women are always victims and men are always villains. The law should protect victims but not the villains.

The sad part here is that the DOE seems more than willing to go along with denial of due process. If schools expelled students based on an allegation, the DOE would probably be okay with that. Fortunately, the accused have access to courts and are winning cases against the schools.

Like0 Dislike0
Submitted by el cid on Fri, 2015-01-02 15:07

Caroline Heldman.
she is an utter disgrace to humanity. i stopped reading those publications and any like them because it got to the point that it was like reading "Mein Kampf"
all you had to do was substitute the word "MAN" with "JEW" and any person with a modicom of common sense could see the out and out, unmitigated bigotry of these women who wrote those ghastly articles.
can someone tell me WHY "organizations" like the National Organization of Women, and the like are not recognised as hate groups?
SOMEONE?
i would really love to hear the excuses...!

Like0 Dislike0
Submitted by ErikaLancastor on Sat, 2015-01-03 10:44

That's a good observation. It's also interesting how feminists try to spread hatred for males by creating an illusion of privilege. Hitler was successful in using this exact same tactic to spread hatred against the Jews before and during WWII.

Like0 Dislike0
Submitted by xtrnl on Tue, 2015-01-06 19:19