As Rolling Stone Recants, WashPost Article Insists 'We Should Automatically Believe Rape Claims'

... yet there's no evidence of it except my accusation, I ought to be believed categorically and w/out further scrutiny or investigation? And to do so immediately exposes at least my sympathy for arsonists and at worst, an irrational, hateful bigotry vs. home-owners?

Rape is a serious crime. Accusations thereof need vetting and evidence to be sustainable. Otherwise, it's the old USSR all over again with "Show me the man and I'll find you the crime." Given that the criminalization of males is the ultimate goal of modern feminism, it should come as no surprise that male-on-female (vs. male-on-male, female-on-female, and female-on-male) rape is being used as the crime to find a man guilty of by default. The strategy feminists are taking is so obvious and over the top, I'm surprised they haven't been laughed out of every room they walk into.

But never underestimate the power of nymphotropism. After all, look at what the evil Nazis got away with, at least until they were clobbered into the ground by the civilized world they were bent on destroying through mass-murder, torture, and military conquest. The only nymphotropism they leveraged was smearing entire ethnic groups with accusations of malicious dealings and rampant gang-rapes of German women. And that didn't work too... hmmm, wait... it *did* in fact work, didn't it? Most notably in one particular Nazi propaganda film.

Lacking a measurable military presence to fight against, I wonder just when the relentless onslaught of feminist Goebbels-like propaganda will stop inducing the bizarre deluding effect it has on ppl and they will suddenly (and I hope soon) wake the f*ck up and get what's happening here. The first group of ppl needing to do this are of course men. It isn't hyperbole to say that indeed, de-male-ifying humanity is exactly modern feminism's end game. As out there as it sounds, that's feminism's "final solution". Look at ppl's actions, not their words, to gauge their true intent. And remember, the targets of Nazi hate shrugged it off as typical anti-Semitism/anti-Gypsy (so-called), anti-X (fill in the blank) until it was too late for them to realize that these bastards weren't kidding. As another analogy, if you had been a member of a tribe that was part of the Iroquois nation back in, say, 1650, would you actually have thought that in 200 years your entire confederation of tribes, much less your own, would be memory? And, that the remaining descendants of the tribes would be living on small patches of land with poor farming soil that they were forced onto by the descendants of your new neighbors who in no small way were still during your time trying to find their asses with both hands? You never would've believed it.

That's what we're dealing with here.

The Femitheist wanted to reduce the male population to ten percent--enough for reproduction and doing the things only men can do, like build skyscrapers and change oil.

Mary Daly and others had similar ideas.

That's the feminist "final solution."