![Subscribe to Syndicate](https://news.mensactivism.org/misc/feed.png)
'No, Hope Solo Is Not "Like" Ray Rice'
Article here. Excerpt:
'Soccer star Hope Solo is alleged to have assaulted her sister and 17-year old nephew in June of this year. Unlike Ray Rice, Solo is still plying her trade as a goalkeeper for the national team. This led several people to claim that Solo is the beneficiary of a double standard. In The New York Times Juliet Macur makes the argument:
"One can argue the differences between an N.F.L. player punching his soon-to-be wife and a soccer star brawling with her family, but it is indisputable that both qualify as domestic violence. The glaring contrast in Solo’s case is that while several football players recently accused of assaults have been removed from the field, she has been held up for praise by the national team.
On Thursday she was even given the honor of wearing the captain’s armband in celebration of her setting the team’s career record for shutouts in its previous game. The question is why.
Celebrating Solo’s achievement right now is like allowing running back Adrian Peterson, who has been accused of child abuse, to continue to play for the Minnesota Vikings — and then awarding him the game ball for his next 100-yard game."
...
In the history of humanity, spouse-beating is a particularly odious tradition—one often employed by men looking to exert power over women. Just as lynching in America is not a phenomenon wholly confined to black people, spouse-beatings are not wholly confined to women. But in our actual history, women have largely been on the receiving end of spouse-beating. We have generally recognized this in our saner moments. There is a reason why we call it the "Violence Against Women Act" and not the "Brawling With Families Act." That is because we recognize that violence against women is an insidious, and sometimes lethal, tradition that deserves a special place in our customs and laws.
...
Hope Solo only becomes Ray Rice through the annihilation of inconvenient history—through some forgery that implies that there is no tradition of men controlling women through violence. We are familiar with other such forgeries. It is how a conversation about the racism of Richie Incognito becomes a conversation about banning black people from using the word "nigger." Or how the destruction of Mike Brown's body becomes a debate about "black-on-black crime." Or how Ray Rice knocking his wife unconscious morphs into, "Yes, but women do it too." Indeed they do—but neither with the consistency, nor urgency, nor lethality of men.'
- Log in to post comments
Comments
Notice the comments are closed
Fastsest way to shut down opposition anywhere to any idea is to not give people the chance to express any challege to what you said/wrote, which is what has been done here (comments have been closed before even one was posted).
That's feminism for you.
Hope Solo Is Not "Like" Ray Rice'
That's correct. They are different.
Rice lashed out ONCE in response to an attack on himself. Solo engaged in a sustained assault on two other individuals, one of whom was a minor.
LMAO
I just love how typical this is.
Whenever a double-standard which favors women is pointed out to a feminist, their reply is always, always, always, "BUT THAT'S DIFFERENT!" or some variation of it.
Squeak, squeak, squeak, and around and around the rationalization hamster goes.
You know they have a weak argument...
...when feminists want to change the discussion to one of history, collective wrongs, and, of course, "the patriarchy". This is all that you need to see, to know that the facts of the case are solidly against them. But, they will never admit to being wrong, so they just try to change the subject.