"Smaller Testicles, Bigger Parenting Role, Study Suggests"

Link here. Excerpt:

'Are men with smaller testicles more involved dads? Could be, say the authors of a new study.

Anthropologists from Emory University in Atlanta wanted to try to better understand why some men are more actively engaged in child rearing than others, said study lead author James Rilling.

"We know children with involved fathers -- at least in modern western societies -- have better developmental outcomes socially, psychologically, and educationally. Yet, some men choose not to be involved," he said.

So the study authors decided to investigate whether anatomy or brain function explained the variation in parenting styles.
...
The findings, Rilling said, suggest that "men with smaller testes and lower testosterone levels were more involved in care-giving. The men with smaller testes volume also had a stronger neural response -- the fMRI showed more activity in the ventral tegmental area, a reward center of the brain -- when the men viewed images of their children."
...
"They've assumed a few things and I'm not sure they have the science to back it up," he said.

"You can't correlate testes size to hormones. Testes size -- barring an injury -- is very much stable. Testosterone level is not," Alukal said. He noted that testosterone levels are "hugely variable" depending on the time of day and other factors.'

Like0 Dislike0

Comments

First, this is another one of "those studies" we're so used to seeing (unfortunately). But I have to wonder, how does "society" expect men to want to be more involved with child-rearing when "studies" like this get press-- or are even pursued? On the one hand, encourage men to be more involved, on the other, imply such men are "lesser men" in some way.

"Do this, but don't." Sounds like your typical feminism-inspired no-win scenario tailor made for shafting guys.

Like0 Dislike0

I don't believe these findings. It seems like another pseudo-science study intended to neuter men, intended to support the testosterone poisoning hypothesis. Again and again we are told that women and women's hormones are good, men and men's hormones are bad. Whatever truth there may have been behind the data is being twisted by the feminist agenda here.

Like0 Dislike0

How do we know that these fathers are also built like brick houses, working out, building muscle and taking testosterone injection (which shrink the testicles).

We know NOTHING about this idiotic study, except that it is idiotic.

Would they fund research to test the following hypothesis? Women with big tits are better mothers?

Likely, not.

Like0 Dislike0