Men = Testosterone Damaged Women

Submitted by Broadsword on Fri, 2012-08-03 21:24

Article here. Excerpt:

The problem with men, as a group, as a type of organism, as a subset of humans, is that at various points along the way on their journey from the female template on which all humans are built biologically, they have been altered in ways that make them dangerous assholes. Even when we try to reduce the male-female difference as a society, men who do not willingly participate in that often end up being fairly nasty, dangerous beasts; they may be rapists, they may be batterers, they may be some other thing. They break our efforts to have an egalitarian peaceful world. In a way, they are broken. They are damaged, if you will. Some of that damage is facilitated by what you may know of as testosterone (a word that stands in for androgens).

But whatever you do, don’t mention this testosterone caused by damage thing because it will upset them.
...
I have found the ongoing conversation about “testosterone damaged brains” to be somewhat less than interesting, full of distraction, very often little more than troll fodder and a huge waste of time. I’ve been asked to explain, to apologize, to produce copious documentation to back up may amazing claims. There are, however, only two reactions to my comment that I’m interested in. One: You go “Ouch” and put your hand up to your eye because I just poked you there. Two: You go “heh, that was funny.” All other reactions are really your problem, not mine. Sorry.'

Like0 Dislike0

Comments

This does not in anyway amount to a serious scientific discussion of men's genetic make-up. It's just the ranting of a woman who blames men for all the problems of the world.

Her idea of an egalitarian world is likely one in which women get all the good stuff and men get all the bad stuff. Small wonder men get in the way of that goal.

Like0 Dislike0
Submitted by el cid on Mon, 2012-08-06 01:23

I think it is important to note this comment by the author:

"Pcarvious, this is not about testing my stance or refuting my evidence from an MRA perspective. I have no interest in that and the regular readers of this blog pretty much share that. The purpose of this post, and of this blog, is not to engage in that particular “conversation.”"

This is from a so called science blog, where science is stating his opinion and silencing those who challenge it in order to avoid the "conversation" that could ultimately lead to his opinions being deemed incorrect. THIS is what feminist science looks like.

Like0 Dislike0
Submitted by Kratch on Tue, 2012-08-07 00:14