MND: Claim that Boys Doing OK in School Comes up Short
Article here. Excerpt:
'This study purports to disprove the notion that there's a boy crisis in education. It's by Sarah Mead courtesy of a self-described "think tank" called the Education Sector. From what I can gather, it pretty accurately represents the response by those in the educational system who want to ignore the obvious problems boys have in school.
Mead's short take is that boys haven't performed worse over the past 35 years, girls have just performed better. Indeed, she claims boys are doing better than ever, just not as well as girls. But to get to that conclusion, Mead misreads the data she herself cites and, simply ignores the implications of other facts.
...
What has caused this crisis in our efforts to educate males can be a subject for debate. Surely many factors contribute. My personal guess is that it has a lot to do with a culture that has been viciously denigrating men since (what a coincidence!) the early 70s. For at least three decades, men in this country have been consistently told, among other things, that we're stupid. Could that possibly have anything to do with poor performance in school? What about the claim that all the good we do is just patriarchal oppression of our betters? Maybe boys have gotten the message. Think of that.'
- Log in to post comments
Comments
This needs to be said
I've read my share of feminist dribble suggesting boys are doing just fine. In most of these reports minority males are cited as the ones in need of assistance. While I agree, low income boys certainly need help, it almost seems like they're hell bent on ignoring white boys.
Patriachry = White Men = Evil
If we suppress the schooling of white boys, maybe will all become equal. Maybe the oppressive white male will learn their role by becoming ditch diggers and shit shovelers. This will stop their evil tyranny. White boys don't deserve shit, its our turn!
I really believe this is what progressives think. Its really frightening at times.
I say 'progressive' because it seems feminism has taken full control over liberal thinking.
I agree
"I say 'progressive' because it seems feminism has taken full control over liberal thinking."
I'm a liberal and I agree with you!
so? sounds peachy..
As long as girls are doing more better than boys, then nothing's wrong. They can still lavish money and programs onto girls to make them do even more more better.
-ax
That's why I'm not a liberal
I guess you can call me a "left-leaning independent" (with a few non-conventional views thrown in), but p.c. and feminism have definitely combined to co-opt the "further" Left.
BTW, the word "progressive" is just a smoke-screen to conceal an agenda.
-ax