Los Angeles Marathon "won" by Russian woman

Headline: "Russian woman making marathon debut wins Los Angeles Marathon"

Actually it was won by a man from Kenya. But you won't see that mentioned here. Excerpt:

'LOS ANGELES (AP) -- Russia's Tatiana Aryasova made a smashing marathon debut Sunday, taking advantage of a head start on the male runners to capture the Los Angeles Marathon.

She held off a group of Kenyan men and finished in 2 hours, 29 minutes and 9 seconds. She gave little thought to the men in pursuit.
...
Kenya's Laban Moiben won the men's division in 2:13:50. Aryasova and Moiben each received $20,000 and a car for winning their divisions.'

In addition to double-think and cognitive dissonance, as well as cowardice, the reporting of this story betrays an unbelievable lack of basic arithmetic skills. The female runners got a 20-minute head start. The first man to cross the line did so at 2:13:50; the first woman, at 2:29:09. So even with a 20-minute head start, she came in about 13 minutes after the first man. Add the 20 minutes to it and she came in about 33 minutes after him.

Yet the headline says she won the marathon.

I got one word for this: *BARF*

Like0 Dislike0

Comments

This is the definition of insanity.

I guess having a vagina is an automatic win in any contest today.

Our culture is dying because of this idiocy.

Like0 Dislike0

who cares? Technically, she cheated. A woman gets a 20 minute head start and beats several men who are disadvantaged in the race and we're supposed to be impressed? Give me a break!

Evan AKA X-TRNL
Real Men Don't Take Abuse!

Like0 Dislike0

Basically they chose a head start bases on male vs female win times to insure a women wins which is typical moving of the goal posts to give women an unfair advantage.

However having said that I'm sorry that I don't agree with the way Matt has interpreted the article.

It says she finished in 2:29:09 (in the femail division) and the man 2:13:50 (in the male division) the times are separate.

Lets (to make it easy) imagine they started at midnight

At 00:00 she sets of and it takes her 2h29 so she finishes at 2:29AM
He has to wait (to let her win) until 00:20 it takes him 2h13 mins so he finishes at 2:33AM

He finished 'behind' her by 4 mins but only because they basically cheated him out of a win.

Anyway my point was she lost by ~15 mins, (but not 33 mins). :)

Like0 Dislike0

She did not win. Pardon me but piss on her. I no longer listen to anyone talking about equal rights for women because it does not exist. It's all special rights for women and all about giving to them and stomping on others including children.

I no longer hold a door open for a woman or take her jacket and I was raised in a old fashioned household! I also believe that if a woman can hit a man, like a man, I would knock her out.

www.move-off.org

Like0 Dislike0

I totally agree. I too was raised in an old-fashioned household, but I refuse to show a woman respect just cause she's a woman. You give respect, you get respect. That's how it works for me. Of course, I give people the benefit of the doubt, but I refuse to be a doormat, and nor will I be a servant. I'm a man! If a woman viciously attacks me, she's gonna get the shit beaten out of her.

Like you and I have said, she didn't win. If she had an unfair advantage, she didn't beat anybody. Quite frankly it's sad that women are so in denial about their physical limitations that they have to cheat to win for the sake of their own self-righteousness, on top of having their own fitness clubs.

Evan AKA X-TRNL
Real Men Don't Take Abuse!

Like0 Dislike0

It says,
"She gave little thought to the men in pursuit."

Yeah no kidding, she was thinking more about the guys she was behind.

-ax

Like0 Dislike0

I go out of my way to demonstrate my contempt for traditional Chivalry.

I especially enjoy it when I am entering the post office or grocery store and there is a woman right behind me as I open the door ... and then walk in and let it slam shut in her face.

They always look surprised, but never say a darn thing.

Probably think it's just my bad manners.

Like0 Dislike0

I go out of my way to demonstrate my contempt for traditional Chivalry.

I especially enjoy it when I am entering the post office or grocery store and there is a woman right behind me as I open the door ... and then walk in and let it slam shut in her face.

*Holding side with laughter*

This post just made my day! Sometimes I actually force it closed on them(I do this on the DL so they can't say I am "abusing" them).

You go Roy!

----------
Mr. Reality's new story - Wendy's feminist tactics are nothing new.

Like0 Dislike0

The women get a 45 minute head start in the London marathon. This virtually guarantees that a woman can be seen to 'win'.

Like0 Dislike0

That word is "pathetic". I could never consider that kind of win to be a true victory. As far as I'm concerned that's like winning in a 2 on 1 fight. Big whoop!

Evan AKA X-TRNL
Real Men Don't Take Abuse!

Like0 Dislike0

A woman "winning" a boxing match against a man with no arms? Good thing there were no poster girl female firefighters present during the 9/11 fiasco they would have been overwhelmed. You can't "gender norm" a catastrophe.

Women "should be" ashamed of themselves; it's obvious they aren't.

You go girls!

----------
Mr. Reality's new story - Wendy's feminist tactics are nothing new.

Like0 Dislike0

In college, I absolutely refused to give up my seat to a female stranger on a bus. I have even got dirty looks from either whipped-males or the self-entitled princesses themselves because I was the only guy to not jump up when a bunch of females entered the bus. Tough shit, I was here first and none of them had crutches.

Like0 Dislike0

We have to start treating women like they treat us. Let chivalry die!

Evan AKA X-TRNL
Real Men Don't Take Abuse!

Like0 Dislike0

My philosophy is a bit different. If I'm on the subway I will give my seat up if children are involved. If I see a mom or dad with two young children, I'll stand.

I'll do same with the elderly. Its difficult for me not to offer my seat to an 85 year old individual.

As for holding doors open? I feel thats common courtesy. I will hold a 7'11 door open for the INDIVIDUAL behind me. Whether its a male or female.

........................................................

[This post was written by an MRA who doesn't hate women.]

Like0 Dislike0

In the London marathon the men and women are running two races. A woman wins the women's race and the men the men's race. A 45-minute start for the women is chosen so that the top women can finish aapart from the top men, but no-one pretends that they've beaten the men.

Like0 Dislike0

They seriously believe they are better than men and that as women they should receive preferential treatment. As stated before it is what many "expect" from men.

The best thing a man can do is to not live up to women's expectations.

----------
Mr. Reality's new story - Wendy's feminist tactics are nothing new.

Like0 Dislike0

MrReality I am glad to have supplied you with some cheap laughs!

Actually I am not so sure it is so much a demonstration of "power," rather it is more a kind of revolutionary indifference.

But then, being indifferent to what women want is maybe the very source of masculine power today.

I'm only interested in the theory.

Someone else can do the actual empirical field research.

I'm too lazy to experiment with the female specimens I would have to procure to get sufficient data....

Like0 Dislike0

I'm too lazy to experiment with the female specimens I would have to procure to get sufficient data....

So am I.

Not to mention that many times experiments involving women go awry being that most behave like spoiled children(There's a reason they always use "women and children" together). Of course this behavior is overlooked since women and their male servants(whom usually act just like misandric women) have made female histrionics socially acceptable, valued even.

Humanity is now nearing the end of a pretty disastrous experiment as we speak.

Experiment: "Women and unrestrained power."

----------
Mr. Reality's new story - Wendy's feminist tactics are nothing new.

Like0 Dislike0

The women's tennis player, who "won" the "man vs. woman competition" match, by beating the incredibly talented and energetic Bobby Riggs.

[For you younger guys, King was a champion player (and feminist pig) in the 70's, of an ability and fame equivalent to say, Serena or Venus Williams. Where as Bobby Riggs was an old decrepit male non-entity, who showed up high on playing day, was probably too stupid to understand the rules, and didn't try all that hard to boot].

-ax

Like0 Dislike0