Dee Dee Myers' new book: What if women ruled the world?

Honestly -- women aren't as good at resolving/ending conflict as men are. If women were in charge conflicts would tend to fester and escalate. When conflicts escalate too far, the next step is violence or war.

Look at Feminism. They've clearly come out on top with the war on men. The problem is that feminists don't know where to stop. So they kept pushing and wound up with the Men's Rights Movement. And we're not going away...

Look at MADD -- Mothers Against Drunk Driving. These women didn't know when to stop either. So, MADD went from an anti-drunk driving to a neo-prohibitionist organisation.

And these are two examples off the top of my head!

That's the first thing that came to my mind as I read this, as well. Let's face it, women are not logical creatures for the most part. Thus, emotions would rule most of the decision making process if women did rule the world. The result would be endless war, and usually just out of spite.

And as for scapegoating men for the problems not being fixed; perhaps feminism can be blamed as well. While feminism is out there trying to make people believe the falsehood that women are oppressed, many injustices are put on the backburner. Besides, most of the world's problems to date have been solved by men, so what the hell is she bitching about?

Evan AKA X-TRNL
Real Men Don't Take Abuse!

"I’m not saying it’s all men’s fault. But let’s just say, they’ve been in charge,"

Women are 51% to 53% of the American electorate so they have the power to decide every election. Additionally, many, many women opt out of running for higher office, living off of men.

Some gender feminists finger point at men for the failures of complicated global and national affairs. Apparently, some gender feminists think they are justified in their misandrist and fraudulent rants, but IMO, they are disingenuous.

Why isn't she complaining about how white people have screwed up everything? Or how heterosexuals have screwed up every thing??

Sounds to me like she is a misandric pig, who should have been working at McDonald's instead of for the President.

It's REALLY scary when women like this get in influential positions. Another example is Wendy Murphy..have you ever seen her on MSNBC? She's the ultimate misandric pig, making Myers look like a worshipper of phalli. (she's influential cause she was an attorney, and is now "consulted" by the media, so people can watch her become hysterical on TV, and thus improve the network's rating). Needless to say, another example is that rhino-looking Nancy Grace. You don't have to be a politician to be influential.

-ax

1. What if women ruled the world?

This question is stated as if women have absolutely no power. Poor widdle women with more privileges and power than any gender has ever enjoyed. Let's give them even more lopsided advantages and power since they write books about being helpless. Bitches please. Women constantly use this helpless angle to get the "WolfmanMAC'S" of the world to hand them even more privileges. The truth is women(and those who serve women only) control the wealth, society, relationships, the politicians, the vote, the media, etc, etc.

2. If women ruled the world there would be no violence

See # 1, study the links between the WKKK(Responsible for "whites only" laws which now mirror "women only" laws, responsible for the hate literature and propaganda that led to the hanging of black men and now the impugning of ALL men, responsible for giving racists the vote and now creating a woman-only strategem, etc, etc) and feminism, then get back to me.

Men have to learn that women gain "dominance" by claiming not to have any power, then subsequently swindling the little power men may have out of them via head games like this one.

Everyone -- except chivalrous politically correct men(and other gender-obssessed women) -- is sick of the whiny, privileged, feminist western female. People with brains aren't taking your fraudulent claims of oppression seriously anymore. Go whine to your PC pundits at the next feminist rally.

We're sick of the lies and sick of you...girls. Grow up! WE DON'T WANT TO HEAR YOUR BULLSHIT ANYMORE.

----------
Mr. Reality's new story - Sir Alan: Why I have to think twice before employing a woman

Let's ignore women like Margaret Thatcher, who took the UK into almost every war that the US was involved in. Oops!

came out w/ similar lunacy the other day. she obviously had been watching femtv and she said something to me that if women were in charge there would be no wars. i told her that the women that have been in power so far were some some very warlike people. then i told her that if there were no women there would be no wars anyway. she looked puzzled so i asked her when did she ever see a couple of guys really going at it when it wasn't about a woman? she just laughed and agreed.

MRReality I am starting to believe in you.

Help me flesh out this argument ...

The entire fraud of feminism is based in a very infantile conception of POWER, right?

Feminism co-opted neo-Marxist theory and successfully made the Evil Patriarchy seem real ... all men are powerful oppressors because a FEW men are powerful, right?

So, then gender becomes not simply a biological difference; rather, a penis becomes socially defined as a privilege and an instrument of domination.

And that privilege becomes a priori something criminal?

What part of this stupid social dementia am I missing?

Write, write. Explain it and be angry if you wish....

His book "The Woman Racket" is right up your alley. Especially the introduction, where he talks at length about the feminist link to Marxism.
-ax

Dumb Blonde number one: "Can I borrow your vibrator tonight?"

Dumb Blonde number two; "Go ahead - I can't use it anyway."

Number one: "Why not?"

Number two: "The ben-wa balls are in the way."

-ax

The game is manipulation; something women are masters of. The point was to make the "masses" believe it. Men are just now realizing the game women have been running. I can easily win a fight if I destroy the other person's will to fight back beforehand. So women claim men have all the power and that men are violent and oppressing women. This is pushed on men time and time again, until they believe it.

Now every woman knows that nearly all men are socialized to be chivalrous when it comes to women, right? Along comes womyn's studies/feminism/empowered women and how likely do you think it is that the male -- who has been programmed to be chivalrous, whom believes he is ALREADY more violent than a woman and also believes that all men oppress women -- will fight back when attacked with pro-feminist/anti-male ideology?

The pre-programmed chivalry holds him back as does all of the other programming he has had throughout the years. That -- in my opinion -- is why most women fight so hard to have the kids at such a young age. That's when the programming begins and children are very susceptible to it. A good example of this is women programming the whole "Men don't hit women/Boys don't hit girls" into men at a young age. This pretty much makes sure that women will be the only ones swinging in a physical confrontation in most cases. It also foreshadows how women expect every battle between male and female to play out. Women are pro-active in their war with men. Remember, thos children that were taught not to hit women grow up to be judges, policemen, politicians, etc. In many cases the man has already been psychologically defeated before he gets to the battlefield.

Another reason -- an integral part of it -- is money. Feminism is a business and the pundits that run it are making good money. Just look at the funding of VAWA. If the claims of frequent abuse are false, and thus funds are not needed to "stop it"(since it's false in most cases); where is the damn money going? Look at how much the legal system makes off of jailing men. Women are paying for misandry and loving it. If you read "Spin Sisters" you'll see how tightly women have the media system locked up and how they spin lie after lie to maintain the status quo. Anything to the contrary is defeated before it sees the light of day.

If I claim I am oppressed I effectively become the victim at least ideologically and any attack on me can be dismissed as "blaming the victim." Therefore the evil patriarchy is a myth and women know it, but it is a necessary myth in order for women to circumvent responsiblity for their actions and maintain their victim status which gives them a license to steal.

At one point the Nazis claimed the Jews were "oppressing" them. This led to some pretty harsh things being done to the Jewish people in the name of equality one could argue.

It's not dementia, it's strategy. Being pro-active, taking away your enemies will to fight, psychologically defeating one's enemy before the battle.

Have you ever read Sun Tzu: The art of War?

"Hence the skillful fighter puts himself into a position which makes defeat impossible, and does not miss the moment for defeating the enemy.

The good fighters of old first put themselves beyond the possibility of defeat, and then waited for an opportunity of defeating the enemy.

All warfare is based on deception.

Hence, when able to attack, we must seem unable; when using our forces, we must seem inactive; when we are near, we must make the enemy believe we are far away; when far away, we must make him believe we are near.

Hold out baits to entice the enemy. Feign disorder, and crush him.
[All commentators, except Chang Yu, say, "When he is in disorder, crush him." It is more natural to suppose that Sun Tzu is still illustrating the uses of deception in war.]

If he is secure at all points, be prepared for him. If he is in superior strength, evade him.

If your opponent is of choleric temper, seek to irritate him. Pretend to be weak, that he may grow arrogant

If he is taking his ease, give him no rest.

Attack him where he is unprepared, appear where you are not expected.

These military devices, leading to victory, must not be divulged beforehand.

Now the general who wins a battle makes many calculations in his temple ere the battle is fought. " ~ Sun Tzu: The Art of War

----------
Mr. Reality's new story - Sir Alan: Why I have to think twice before employing a woman

MrR,

Excellent post. (Though I believe your radicalism is disturbing some MANN readers.)

Indeed, I have several versions of Sun Tzu's THE ART OF WAR. I especially like the Denma translation.

There is really no limit to the strategic wisdom in this book, even though it was written well before any modern capitalism.

"Although the enemy offers me advantage, I do not emerge. I lead my troops away...."

(Chapter 10 - Forms of the Earth.)

ax--

Come on now.

You know that Matt's girlfriend owns a vibrator.

How else could she survive all the time he spends moderating MANN and ignoring her needs?

There should be a Pay-Pal link for batteries!

(Though I believe your radicalism is disturbing some MANN readers.)

Charge of Fanaticism (Code Brown) - The Brown Shirts Charge

Discussion: The target is accused of subscribing to an intolerant, extremist ideology or of being devoted to an ignorant viewpoint. Examples:

"You're one of those right-wing wackos."
"You're an extremist"
"You sound like the KKK."
"... more anti-feminist zaniness"

Response: One should remember that the truth is not decided by the number of people subscribing to it. Whether or not certain ideas are "out of the mainstream" is besides the point. A correct conclusion is also not necessarily reached by embracing some middle ground between two opposing viewpoints (i.e., the logical fallacy of "False Compromise").

Thus one speaking facts in a pro-feminist world dedicated to promoting lies should expect to "disturb" the liars.

*Shrugs*

This isn't a popularity contest, nor do the short-sighted opinions of a few misled members on MANN matter much in the overall scheme of things.

----------
Mr. Reality's new story - Sir Alan: Why I have to think twice before employing a woman

Hey...

When I describe a poster as "radical," that is a compliment in my language.

A writer worth reading.

I guess I could have made that clearer, but I was reassembling my AK-47 and typing at the same time.

Blindfolded.

I'm aware that "you" meant it as a compliment. I was referring to "the others I shall not name."

I was reassembling my AK-47 and typing at the same time.

Blindfolded.

You still can't "multi-task" as good as a woman according to mainstream PC dogma.

----------
Mr. Reality's new story - Sir Alan: Why I have to think twice before employing a woman

No comment. =)