Submitted by Matt on Wed, 2012-08-29 23:52
Article here. Excerpt:
'What do intellectuals have against men?
Back in June 1999, American Psychologist printed “Deconstruction of the Essential Father,” asserting that kids don’t need a dad. The implication was that children stand just as good a chance of growing up healthy and well-adjusted if raised by one parent, or unmarried parents, or homosexuals, as if raised by their own biological dad and mom in a happy marriage.
...
But Professor Hampikian isn’t finished. He reduces the role of men not merely to our raw biological contribution to human reproduction, but even less: the weight of that contribution—in trillionths of grams. “[Y]our father’s 3.3 picograms of dna comes out to less than one pound of male contribution since the beginning of Homo sapiens 107 billion babies ago.”
Males’ combined contribution to humankind throughout history hasn’t even amounted one whole pound! Who needs them?
Like0 Dislike0
Submitted by Matt on Wed, 2012-08-29 23:50
Article here. Excerpt:
'Boys now seek refuge in cheesy horror novels because the Cultural Authorities won't give them the adventure books that were once staples in every boy's life. It is to this I attribute the popularity of vampire novels (and movies and television shows). But even here a boy is destined for disappointment.
...
We have the mistaken impression that it was traditional children’s literature that was preachy. This is not only untrue, but it is almost the exact opposite of the truth. It is precisely the preachiness of politically correct modern literature that offends their innate sense of honesty and justice—a human instinct that we do our best to educate out of them.
Like0 Dislike0
Submitted by Matt on Wed, 2012-08-29 23:47
Story here. Excerpt:
'A WOMAN who chopped off her ex partner's penis to stop him impregnating other women will serve less than four years in jail.
Jian Chen was this morning sentenced to a minimum of three years and nine months in jail after pleading guilty to the manslaughter of her ex partner Xian Peng at her North Ryde home in February 2011.
The court accepted the guilty plea to the lesser charge, and withdrew the murder charge, because Chen was suffering from an "abnormality of the mind" due to mental illness and the belief Peng was going to take their child to China.'
Like0 Dislike0
Submitted by Mastodon on Wed, 2012-08-29 06:38
Article here. Excerpt:
'Far from encouraging men to patronise a local pub to escape from domestic duties, marriage actively reduces their alcohol intake, according to research being presented at the American Sociological Association today.
...
The researchers found that married women generally drink more heavily than single women, widows or divorcees.
By contrast, men who are happily married drink less than their bachelor friends and significantly less than divorced men.
The reason, the researchers conclude, is that while women can help keep their husbands’ drinking habits under control, men are simply a bad influence on their wives.'
Like0 Dislike0
Submitted by Mastodon on Wed, 2012-08-29 06:34
Submitted by Minuteman on Wed, 2012-08-29 03:35
Link here. Excerpt:
'A deaf three-year-old boy has been told by school officials in the US to change the way he signs his name because the gesture resembles a shooting gun.
Hunter Spanjer uses hand shapes to communicate — a method known as Signing Exact English, which is meant to mimic spoken words.
Hunter signs his name by crossing his index finger and middle finger and then shaking his hands.
...
Mr Spanjer is disputing the school's ruling, saying the name sign is not threatening in any way.
The school has declined to discuss the matter publicly, saying only they were working with the parents on a compromise.'
Like0 Dislike0
Submitted by Matt on Wed, 2012-08-29 02:45
Ann Romney made a stirring speech tonight at the RNC Convention. It was, overall, an effective speech. But alas, it seems putting men down in some way just seems to be a requirement of political figures either in or aspiring to office, either directly or by proxy. I have no doubt Mrs. Romney believes every word she spoke but also that her husband does too, or at least supports her saying it.
Just once in this modern era I'd like to hear a major political speech made and not have it pander to feminist sentiments and/or display out and out anti-male bigotry. Can you just imagine a male politician making statements similar to those Ann Romney made tonight about women and it not being a sure-fire rocket-sled ride into electoral irrelevance?
Speech transcript here. Excerpt:
"And if you listen carefully, you’ll hear the women sighing a little bit more than the men. It’s how it is, isn’t it?
It’s the moms who always have to work a little harder, to make everything right.
Like0 Dislike0
Submitted by Matt on Tue, 2012-08-28 23:36
Last December the University of Montana at Missoula was ranked as the "safest" university in Montana in terms of low rates of forcible rape and other violent crimes (1). But five months later the U.S. Dept. of Justice and Dept. of Education claimed the U. of Montana's failure to adequately address an alleged rash of sexual assaults was "very disturbing."
In March, quarterback Jordan Johnson was charged with rape, which former prosecutor Kirsten Pabst said was done just "to send a message." (2) And just this week, it was revealed that the U. of Montana has implemented mandatory training for students that talk about "rape-prone culture" and label false allegations of rape a "myth."(3)
Has the U. of Montana suddenly become a hotbed of sexual assault, or is the college simply terrifying everyone because of the DED's April 11 sexual assault directive?
Like0 Dislike0
Submitted by Matt on Tue, 2012-08-28 23:31
Article here. A convent? Convent?? For a woman who was a willing accomplice to multiple counts of child rape and murder? Shouldn't she be in jail for life along with her unspeakably evil ex-husband? If this had been two men who had done this, with one being "only" an accomplice, you can be sure he would not ever see the light of day again, and rightly so. So why is this woman? The answer is of course in the last word of that question. Story here. Excerpt:
'The jailed ex-wife of child killer Marc Dutroux has been released from prison, after Belgium's highest court upheld her transfer to a convent.
The controversial move for Michelle Martin comes 16 years into her 30-year sentence.
Relatives of the pair's victims have expressed outrage over the decision, with one describing it as "absurd".
Earlier, a court in Brussels rejected two appeals against the ruling.
Like0 Dislike0
Submitted by MikeJH on Tue, 2012-08-28 18:30
Article here. Excerpt:
'At the exhibition, only work by women artists is displayed - and for the first month, only women were allowed in.
The organisers are now letting men in - but for most of the month of August they were turned away.
Sarah Wilson said: "It's kind of an experiment - it's a two-month exhibition and the first month has been solely for women - men are not allowed in.
"I don't have a police badge that means I can throw them out on the street but I wanted to create a space where women can work together with other women."'
Like0 Dislike0
Submitted by Mastodon on Tue, 2012-08-28 01:20
Submitted by Matt on Tue, 2012-08-28 00:49
Commentary here (.pdf file). Excerpt:
'Male circumcision is a radical operation that irreversibly excises and amputates a healthy functional body part. The part removed is the foreskin or prepuce of the penis, which constitutes more than fifty percent of the skin and mucosa of the penis. The foreskin, which is a complex structure containing, smooth muscle, large vascular structures, and is highly innervated, has numerous protective, immunological, mechanical, sensory, and sexual physiological functions. The task force on circumcision, however, makes absolutely no mention of the nature or function of the foreskin, although this information is of great relevance to making a decision regarding circumcision.
Rights of the child
Like0 Dislike0
Submitted by DanBollinger on Mon, 2012-08-27 17:42
Press release here. Excerpt:
'Intact America demands that the American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP) retract its Technical Report released today* extolling the benefits of neonatal male circumcision. According to Georganne Chapin, founding executive director of Intact America, the Report disregards pediatricians’ ethical obligations to their patients and promotes the benefits of circumcision through a selective and self-serving literature review. Further, by calling for public and private insurance payments for medically unnecessary circumcision, the Report promotes pediatricians’ self interest, at the cost of the safety and wellbeing of newborn baby boys and the men they will become. The Report, written by the AAP’s Task Force on Circumcision, is to go before the AAP membership at its October meeting in New Orleans. It stops short of recommending circumcision, even as it claims the surgery’s benefits outweigh the risks, and calls for parents to be the ultimate decision-makers.
Like0 Dislike0
Submitted by Broadsword on Mon, 2012-08-27 15:30
Article here. Excerpt:
'A married woman whose husband donated sperm without her knowledge is calling for clinics to be forced to ask for a wife's consent.
The unnamed mother-of-one from Surrey said she feared that children fathered with the sperm – who would be half-brothers or sisters of her son – may one day 'disrupt' the family by getting in touch.
She has written to the Human Fertilisation and Embryology Authority calling for guidelines on sperm donation to include the spouse's views – and says the sperm should be treated as a joint 'marital asset'.
A controversial ruling in 2005 meant all children born through sperm donation – up to ten families are allowed per donor – have the right to trace their biological father when they reach adulthood.
In her heartfelt letter to the fertility watchdog, she told how her husband had donated sperm against her wishes after suffering Post Traumatic Stress Disorder following the birth of their child.'
Like0 Dislike0
Submitted by Mastodon on Mon, 2012-08-27 04:07
Article here. Excerpt:
'(CNSNews.com) - According to the Gallup tracking poll of the presidential race, there is a gender gap in the candidates' appeal: Men are more likely to favor Republican candidate Mitt Romney and women are more likely to favor Democratic candidate Barack Obama--by the exact same percentages.
In Gallup's tracking between July 30 and August 19, 50 percent of male registered voters said they supported Romney and 42 percent said they supported Obama. At the same time, 50 percent of female registered voters said they supported Obama and 42 percent said they supported Romney.
The Gallup poll showed a similar, but larger disparity, between married and unmarried registered votes. Among those who were married, Romney led Obama 55 to 37. Among those were not married, Obama led Romney, 57 to 34.'
Like0 Dislike0
Pages