Submitted by Matt on Sat, 2013-09-21 18:19
Story here. Excerpt:
'Aftab Khan was giving evidence at the trial of Amanda Hutton, who denies manslaughter over the death of her son Hamzah Khan in December 2009.
The youngster's body was found by police nearly two years later.
During a day of harrowing testimony at Bradford Crown Court, jurors heard how police visited Hutton's house nine times before Hamzah's death.
They were also read a transcript of an interview Mr Khan gave to police after he was arrested for hitting Hutton in 2008.
He told officers his son was undernourished and neglected and threatened to contact social services, warning: "Believe me, I'm going to get in touch ... because it's gone so far now."
He also described how Hutton refused to let him take Hamzah to see a doctor, despite telling her "time and time again" he was not well.'
Like0 Dislike0
Submitted by Minuteman on Sat, 2013-09-21 04:45
Link here. Excerpt:
'Women differ from men in anatomy, physiology, risk factors and disease symptoms. They are also likely to use more medical devices over the course of their lives than men do.
That is why FDA is actively trying to learn more about how medical devices uniquely affect women, and how women can be better served by them.
...
One specific activity highlighted in the report was a workshop sponsored earlier this summer by the Center for Devices and Radiological Health (CDRH) to formally launch a new program designed to more closely look at medical device use and the health of women (HoW).
...
Nearly 200 representatives from industry, academia, health care, federal agencies, patient and advocacy groups, gathered to discuss the issues related to medical devices and health in women and to brainstorm about effective strategies to address clinical research needs in this population.
This work builds on a December 2011 draft guidance, also highlighted in this month’s 907 report.'
Like0 Dislike0
Submitted by Mastodon on Sat, 2013-09-21 00:23
Article here. Excerpt:
'Women in full-time, year-round jobs still make 77 cents for every dollar men make, said the U.S. Census Bureau this week — a zero percent change since 2002.
Full-time male workers brought in median annual earnings of $49,398 in 2012, compared with $37,791 for females. That's almost an $11,500 difference in yearly median wages.
So why has the gap remained unchanged (with the exception of one cent fluctuations in 2003 and 2007) for 11 years?
Discrimination plays a role, yes, but "analysts caution that the annual earnings comparison is a crude measure of a complex reality," says Brenda Cronin in The Wall Street Journal.'
Like0 Dislike0
Submitted by Mastodon on Sat, 2013-09-21 00:19
Article here. Excerpt:
These days dropping the word "circumcision" on the Internet is like yelling "fire" in a crowded theater. People. Go. NUTS.
The thing I don't understand? Why? Why are people so concerned about what other people have done with their son's foreskin?
I'll admit I do not have a son. I did not circumcise. Although I can't say whether I would have. The ironic thing is, although we did not know the gender of our baby-to-be, I never really thought about whether or not we'd snip his little manhood.'
Like0 Dislike0
Submitted by Mastodon on Sat, 2013-09-21 00:17
Submitted by Mastodon on Fri, 2013-09-20 19:12
Article here. Excerpt:
'At a symposium here House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi, D-Calif., influential Rep. Rosa DeLauro, D-Conn., top Obama White House advisor Valerie Jarrett, speakers from the Service Employees and other allies declared the start of a grass-roots national campaign to enact the "Fair Shot: A Plan For Women And Families To Get Ahead."
That campaign, said Center for American Progress executive director Neera Tamden, recognizes the only way to move issues through a gridlocked Congress is to shove lawmakers with mobilized popular support. The Center was the sponsor of the Sept. 18 rollout of Fair Shot.
Like0 Dislike0
Submitted by Matt on Fri, 2013-09-20 02:49
Came across this essay on conscription. Read the comments, good exchanges. (There are other essays on the site dealing with other topics that aren't MR-related; some may find them of interest, others not.) Excerpt:
'The one form of indentured servitude still legal for non-convicts in the United States is military service. When you join the military, you have fewer rights and freedoms left than did “indentured servants” in the Americas three centuries ago:
- You have masters whose orders you must follow without question.
- You are not allowed to “quit” until your contracted term ends (if then), unless your appeal to your masters and they agree, which is unlikely.
- They command labor from you, while you’re paid a token sum and given a minimal standard of food and shelter.
- You may well be doing it on the promise of training that can become a career once you are freed of the obligation.
So far, this describes an indentured servant in the Colonies in 1700, or a US soldier.
Like0 Dislike0
Submitted by Matt on Fri, 2013-09-20 01:01
Article here. Excerpt:
'You may seek a modification in your existing Massachusetts child support order if it is inconsistent with the new 2013 Guidelines. Presumably, this will apply to all or almost all existing child support orders given the overall reductions that have been made.
Consider seeking a modification if any of the following factors may impact your child support.
1. Support guidelines were reduced, resulting in an average 11% decrease for one-child families and a 6% decrease for two child families.
2. A new formula was established for calculating support where parenting time is higher than the norm.
3. The court must now consider “availability of employment at the attributed income level.”
4. Orders for education costs for adult dependent children are not presumptive.'
Like0 Dislike0
Submitted by Matt on Fri, 2013-09-20 00:43
An original essay submitted by a reader:
The Fair Child Support Act
Due to the ongoing discrepancies in county/state child support laws taking place across the United States, and the inability to bring fairness to the parents (which, are often primarily fathers) ordered to pay support thru the system, there is a great need for several changes to be implemented. Agree or not, the often biased decisions taking place throughout this system continue to be a major factor in the breakdown of the father-mother-child(ren) relationship. Being someone who was a former teen mother myself at one point, I offer a view many females and the child support system fails to consider. Too often, courts almost always side with a mother when the issue of support arises regardless of mitigating factors due to the fact no one speaks up for fathers' rights.
One major area for addressing unfair practices in child support cases is the immediate need to impose changes to laws that make the death of a child whom support is being paid a reason to eliminate the ongoing order. Nothing in life is as final as death and no parent should be expected to continue to pay past or ongoing support to a mother (or custodial parent) for a child who is not even alive anymore to benefit from it. This practice accounts to nothing more than being one of the most cruel and unjust forms of punishment designed by county/state/federal governments throughout America today. It is tragic enough that the parent of a deceased child will have to endure a lifetime of grief over the loss of their child, but to be forced by law to continue to pay a support order for that child is immoral and beyond reproach.
Like0 Dislike0
Submitted by Mastodon on Thu, 2013-09-19 22:52
Article here. Excerpt:
'In 2000, Christina Hoff Sommers published The War Against Boys: How Misguided Feminism is Harming Our Young Men. Hoff Sommers was already known as a critic of late-20th-century feminism; her much-lauded and much-disparaged 1994 book Who Stole Feminism? had provoked charges that she was anti-women. In August, Hoff Sommers, now a resident scholar at the American Enterprise Institute in Washington, updated and reissued her bestseller on boys with a new subtitle: How Misguided Policies Are Harming Our Young Men. Hoff Sommers makes the case that boys and girls are fundamentally different—and that ignoring the difference, in an effort to protect girls, amounts to a “war against boys.”
...
Q: The obvious counterpoint is that so many more men are CEOs of Fortune 500 companies and top politicians. How can we explain that top-tier divide?
Like0 Dislike0
Submitted by Mastodon on Thu, 2013-09-19 02:11
Story here.
'An Ohio woman convicted of killing her baby daughter in a microwave oven wants a fourth trial because of errors made in her last trial, her lawyer said.
China Arnold, 33, was convicted three times of killing her 28-day-old daughter, Paris Talley -- in February 2008, September 2008 and May 2011.
She was sentenced to the death penalty on her first conviction and to life in prison on the subsequent two convictions.
Tuesday attorney Christopher Thompson requested a fourth trial in Ohio's Second District Court of Appeals because he said five errors were made in her case, the Dayton Daily News reported. He requested a trial without the chance of the death penalty.'
Like0 Dislike0
Submitted by Mastodon on Wed, 2013-09-18 22:00
Story here. Excerpt:
'A group that sparked controversy after putting up posters that blasted false accusations of rape in Edmonton has turned its focus on Lise Gotell, the chair of women's and gender studies at the University of Alberta.
Men's Rights Edmonton have put up posters on the campus that show Gotell's face with the caption, "Theft isn't black. Bank fraud isn't Jewish. And rape isn't male.
"Just because you're paid to demonize men doesn't mean rape is gendered. Don't be that bigot," it adds.
...
In July, the group targeted the "Don't Be That Guy" campaign on sex assault awareness with a poster that was titled, "Don't Be That Girl."
"Just because you regret a one night stand doesn't mean it wasn't consensual," it read.
The group denied advocating or apologizing for rape at the time, saying that both rape and false accusations of rape are "abhorrent means of manipulation and power."
Men's Rights Edmonton also launched a Calgary chapter this month and wrote about "exciting times ahead of us."'
Like0 Dislike0
Submitted by Mastodon on Wed, 2013-09-18 15:28
Article here. Excerpt:
'The 2008 financial crisis that devastated many Western economies also reaped a heavy toll in suicides among men, a study published on Tuesday suggests.
Health researchers analyzed data for suicides among people aged over 15 in 54 countries, comparing rates before and after the crash.
In 2009, there were 4,884 more suicides compared with the normal trend, they said.
Suicide numbers in 2009 were 4.2 percent higher in 27 European countries and 6.4 percent higher in 18 countries in the Caribbean and Latin America.
The benchmark is the suicide trend for 2000-2007, extrapolated to 2009.'
Like0 Dislike0
Submitted by Matt on Wed, 2013-09-18 14:54
Press release here. Excerpt:
'WASHINGTON / September 18, 2013 – A report released today concludes prosecutor misconduct is widespread and ingrained in our nation’s criminal justice system. Only rarely does prosecutor misconduct result in the imposition of sanctions. The report, issued by the non-partisan Center for Prosecutor Integrity, calls for fundamental reform of the oversight policies for the nation’s 30,000 prosecutors.
And according to a recent Center for Prosecutor Integrity survey, 43% of persons nationwide believe prosecutorial misconduct is widespread: http://www.saveservices.org/prosecutors/survey/
Prosecutor misconduct takes many forms, including charging a suspect with more crimes than warranted, concealing evidence, coercing witnesses, and making misleading statements to the jury.'
Like0 Dislike0
Submitted by Matt on Wed, 2013-09-18 01:31
Pages