Glenn Sacks, the only regularly published male columnist in the US who
writes about gender issues from a perspective unapologetically sympathetic to men, has in his latest column come out strongly in defense of American Muslims and Arabs who have been targeted for hate crimes since the September 11 terrorist attack. You can read his article, All Americans Need to Stand Up for US Arabs, Muslims, which I feel is an important message we need to support. Arabic men, in particular, are under the most suspicion and distrust these days. Update: Glenn also has a new article, "Attacks on American Muslims Reaffirm Wisdom of 2nd Amendment" which should appear on his web site soon.

This article from Boston University's The Daily Free Press claims that men are now more and more being affected by eating disorders traditionally thought to be women-only problems. The Eating Disorders Council of Long Island estimates that at least one in 10 people with eating disorders in the United States is a man. Medical health professionals such as those at the Eating Disorders Council believe more cases exist, but that many go unnoticed and underreported. That sounds familiar...

This article from the University of Wisconsin's Badger Herald may put at ease some college age men who fear the draft may soon call them into a physical fight against terrorism against their will. According to the author, Wisconsin professors doubt the draft will be used in the war against terrorism. One large group of people noticeably absent in the draft is women. The original draft provisions referred only to "male persons" as candidates. The constitutionality of this was upheld in 1981 in Rosktker v. Goldberg. President Clinton also asked the Department of Defense to reconsider the gender requirement in 1994, but they came to no decisive conclusions. Pevehouse said the draft is very unlikely to be reinstated, and young men should not worry about it. Update: The author of this piece misspelled Roskter. The summary of the case may be found here.

This commentary in the UK Guardian points to a lack of female perspective and reporting over the recent terrorist attacks in America. The writer essentially blames The Patriarchy, and then claims that is woman's nature to be less violent and more nurturing than men. She hints, but does not explicity say, that men did the killing, so other men should die fighting the killers. Now this is a writer who deserves some letters.

Robex writes "This article was printed in The Times of London today entitled "As men became heroes". Amongst other things, Josephine Hart (the article's author), learned the following from the WTC disaster:
"We learnt that men are not all children, potential rapists and commitment-phobes. We learnt because they taught us with every step they took, trudging their way up the stairs of the World Trade Centre to almost certain doom while others walked down to the hope of safety."
Whether her own personal beliefs, or repeating supposedly commonly held stereotypes, the paragraph tells us much about Hart's attitude to men.
I have written to The Times today expressing dismay at these comments and pointing out that it pains me greatly that men have to die on live TV to change one embittered writer's view of them."

I've come across this e-groups message asking a very important question, one that goes right to the heart of the men's movement: namely at what point do boys become "non innocent" and therefore expendable? And why is half of humanity left out of that infamous saying "women and children only"? It's quite a question, and I doubt we'll find an easy answer.

Mexican legislators have reversed a law which would lower sentences for men convicted of rape if said rape was "provoked." This story on nj.com fills in the details. Although I, personally, disagree with most rape provocation theories (I control my penis), this article does prove that women's groups hold a tremendous amount of power all over the world, and that lawmakers will cave for whatever their demands may be.

We've missed announcing the past couple editions of Schuett's DesertLight Journal, but this is to let you know that issue number 12 has been released and can be read on-line here. The e-zine covers a couple of interesting editorials related to the terrorist attacks last Tuesday.

Comedian Paula Poundstone has been relieved of three counts of "lewdness" charges against her and has pled no contest to child endangerment, according to this report on Excite News. She's been slapped with five years probation (she could have received 13 years and four months in prison). She will also not be allowed to care for any more foster children, and the two foster children previously under her care will not be returned to her. She may regain custody of her adoptive children, however.

Catherine Harris wrote an article about choice for men that was printed on the RITRO (Real Insight Through Raw Opinion) web site. She discusses equality, what it means, and how when it comes to reproductive rights, men and women don't have equal rights. "Men have no reproductive rights, and for women that fight for true equality this fact should shoot up a red flare. Equality is not about domination, which is what many women are looking for. Equality is about having equal rights along with the equal responsibilities." It's great to see more articles like this coming from women.

This column by The Guy Code's "Commando Dad" is a heart-wrenching look at a divorced father's pain as he attempts to reach out to his eldest son, who will soon be leaving for bootcamp. Commando Dad chronicles the letters and e-mails never acknowledged, and one horrible moment when his own son tells him he has "nothing to say to you." It's a gut-twisting look at what befalls man after divorce. It's sad and depressing, but a must-read.

I added a new poll today, one I've been meaning to add for a while which was suggested to me by Rams. Hopefully, it will help people pause and think about their answer, and whether they're happy about it and want to change it. I know I was pretty disappointed about my own answer when I stopped to think about it.

After some significant editing, the final versions of the domestic violence awareness flyers have been posted to Mensactivism.org. Download them, distribute them, and do something to help raise awareness of abused men! Click here for the flyers. Update: The Q&A flyer was updated around 9 PM Eastern Time on 9/17 - please download the new version if you grabbed them earlier!

Mike Franco of The Fatherhood Coalition wrote an excellent letter countering the "deadbeat dad" smokescreen, it's hard hitting and well written. Go to Massnews letters and scroll to the end of the page and read his letter titled "Column in MetroWest Was Wrong" the last paragraph is a real "I felt that from over here" moment in my opinion, you'll understand when you read it.

This commentary on prison rape by the National Catholic Review may represent the first time media has acknowledged the existence of Human Rights Watch's recent report on male rape in prisons. The author of the commentary is horrified by the report. By allowing rape to go on, the “correctional” authorities ensure that prisoner violence is contained within the cells. Frustrated prisoners are permitted to release aggression on condition that they direct it against other inmates, not the authorities. That the victims, who comprise as much as 20 percent of 2 million inmates held in U.S. prisons and jail, live in perpetual fear is also conducive to control. Divide and conquer is the name of the game; the fact that it amounts to horrendous violations of human rights does not really interest the prison authorities.