New Zealand's Stuff reports on a female educator who believes that boys currently have little direction and no true sense of what it means to be male, and for too many young men, prison is their only "male right of passage." She advocates for a men's movement, similar to feminism, that will give boys a strong identity and empower them to lead strong and healthy lives. "[Ms Lashlie] said the excitement of being truly male had been vaporised and washed away by feminism...She called for the boys' schools to publicly promote the place of men in society and celebrate their differences from women." You can read the story here.

This column in Playboy asserts that men are stupid. It backs up this assumption with statistics comparing the number of men in college versus the number of women. Further, it attempts to "guide" men in our efforts to date women "smarter" than we are. Obviously, Playboy's editors decided to trash their famous journalistic endeavors of the past in favor of taking feminist numbers at face value, without exploring the real reasons fewer men are in college or show any ambition these days. Namely, college campuses are politically correct and not male friendly places. Neither is the classroom.

This story in the Salt Lake Tribune quotes a female "academic" who claims that the sports world (which she admits was created by men for men), particularly the Olympics, is discriminatory against women. Nevermind that every year the Olympic committee is adding more sports and medals for women athletes, she says. That's only a reminder that women have a long way to go.

This short column on the New York Times Web site (free registration required) points out the well-known fact that females fetuses are less likely to be still-born or spontaneously aborted, but the last line struck me as an extension of the "men's shorter lifespans are a women's issue" argument: The W.H.O. warns, "When this female potential for greater longevity is not realized it is an indication of serious health hazards in their immediate environment," like malnutrition or neglect.

According to this article from CourierPress.com, scientists may have discovered that a certain type of Y-chromosome (which starts the process of a fetus becoming male) may contribute to the fact that men are twice as likely as women to have high blood pressure until age 55.

Missingsomething.com has a list of 8 recommendations to solve the problem of child support, mainly by getting rid of the bureaucracy involved and maintaining the parent/child relationship by keeping it the way it was before divorce. One final recommendation I would add is joint physical custody, so that regardless of whom the NCP is, they can look after their kids directly, without compromising their relationship. Here's the link to it.

I've a found an interesting article where "Doc Love" advises men to be more conniving so they can stand on an equal level with women. Perhaps this quote sums up the article better than I could: "You and your girlfriends say that I'm teaching men to be conniving women. Well, I couldn't have said it better myself. If fathers would teach their sons to be a little more conniving, then the war of the sexes might be a bit more of a fair fight instead of manslaughter." Heresy or honesty? Don't ask me, I just post articles around here :)

Tonight's on-line chat will be about the male-only military draft. Is it sexist? If so, what should be done about it? Should women be drafted, or should the draft be abolished? Or is there some other solution? Join us tonight to discuss these and other questions related to the draft and men's issues. I've begun to wonder if the draft could now become a common cause for young men that would bring them into the men's movement. If so, how should this be done? Click here for our on-line chat page and join us at 9:30 PM Eastern Time tonight!

Frank Hujber submitted his own essay about the value of masculinity in society, particularly to deal with massive disasters such as what the United States has recently experienced. His essay, A Comment on Heroes, can be read by clicking Read More below.

Ragtime wrote in a short article about the state of affairs in Ontario, Canada, these days with regard to domestic violence. If you're a long time visitor of this web site, you'll recall that we reported on a law passed in Ontario called Bill 117 - which is the most extreme form of punishment on someone accused of domestic violence that I've heard of to date. The worst part is that the consequences occur not after a conviction, but upon a simple accusation, which need not be verified by the police in any form. Click Read More below for Ragtime's discussion of the matter.

rparent32 writes "This link is to the original story, and the second is a follow up. What I found interesting is that this piece doesn't deal with injured genitals in the familiar humorous genre. Also I found it interesting that the cop didn't want to press charges, because the women had enough problems already. It seems she, and others, lost their jobs, and this was the reason for the protest. Why do so many men refuse to press charges against women? Is it just an extension of the old concept of chivalry?"

Amid all the news about the war against terrorism, this story went largely unnoticed in the major news media last week. Andrea Pia Yates, the Texas mother who methodically drowned her five children in the bathtub, has been deemed competent for trial. Prosecutors are seeking the death penalty.

This transcript of a recent Dateline NBC tells the story of Tom Burnett, one of the now famous passengers of Flight 93, which crashed outside Pittsburgh after Burnett and other passengers attempted to overtake the hijackers. The story is inspiring.

I do have to admit, that since the terrorist attacks on the U.S, there has been a good number of pro-male news stories in the media. Thanks to Glenn Sacks and Claude Moreau for sending in this one from the National Post. Christie Blatchford writes in appreciation of the men who risked all and pushed their limits to help others. Check it out.

rparent32 sent in this Ananova story about a father who objects to having his son circumcised and whose mother insists on the procedure. rparent32 writes, "It seems this couple split up over the circumcision issue, and are now in court. I don't know if the court will decide if the boy should undergo the procedure or not, or decide which parent gets to decide. I'll keep looking for follow ups to this story and post them."