This testimony by Michael Tanner explains the link between welfare and crime for young black men, but it really is a universal concept and not just a racial issue. Some parts are a bit dubious, but at least they're starting to look at policies that economically marginalize men for the short-term benefit of the sancrosact "women and children," which will only make things worse for everyone in the long run." Scott's note: The comments about how welfare checks "replace" the roles of men in poor urban areas is an accurate comment, and there was also mention about the need of fathers and male role models for young men, which I think is very relevant to our cause.

Mike from Men's News Daily wrote an editorial related to what I like to call "judicial chivalry," or how women often get shorter sentences than men for the same crime, because they're women. Mike's article discusses how feminists have tried to turn the concept on its head, claiming that women are punished more severely for committing crimes, since criminal behavior is seen as a male realm. He ends the essay with an encouraging anecdote of a judge who saw through this issue and refused to be apologetic about sentencing a woman who had nine children.

How's this for unexpected? I came across this interview with Lendon Smith, A man who claims that ADD/ADHD is basically caused by a dietary problem and giving the kid certain foodstuffs would stop the problem. He also claims to have an 80% success rate with his nutritional method. Think of this article as a reminder that we have to help the nearest boy as much as the nearest man.

Neil Steyskal writes "The Washington Post's advice columnist tells how to deal with women who don't pay their share." The response is pretty entertaining, too. Check it out.

The latest Men's Health America posting reveals an urgency to contact that U.S. Senate Foreign Relations Committee to urge them to address the needs of Afghan men, and to prevent the brutalization of Afghan men as has happened for so many years during and before Taliban rule. A sample letter is included, and those with Senators not on the Committee are urged to write to committee chairman Joseph Biden. In other news on this campaign, Neil Steyskal got yet another letter printed in the Washington Times. Spartacus also sent in this link which has a ton of stories which are potentially biased. Just pick a few, read them, and consider writing in response.

plumber writes "Christina Hoff Sommers, who wrote The War Against Boys recently encountered outrageous abuse at a government-sponsored conference. Because she dared to question the value of the program "Girl Power," she was told to stop talking by the organizers, heckled by the audience, and Professor Jay Wade of Fordham University shouted from the audience "Shut the fuck up, bitch!" We should recognize the courage of Ms. Hoff Sommers and others who confront feminist power with truth. She might also appreciate some sympathy and thank you notes at sommers22@aol.com."

Rams writes "Chris McKendry works for ESPN and wrote this short piece on some of the things she's observed working in an environment dominated by men. They sound reasonable to me, and I particularly like what she wrote about working dads. Check it out." Rams put this under the "Humor" category, and I think that's a fine place for it. It's a lighthearted article, which I think we could use more often on this site. :)

Serge submitted this BBC News article, which covers the new parliament in Kosovo, which will institute a quota system to guarantee members will be at least 28% female. "While many countries, including France, Italy and Belgium have systems that demand a minimum number of women candidates, virtually none ensure that they are elected." The article also notes that "The US has one of the lowest number of elected women officials of any (Western democratic) nation." But to that I would add that just because men are the ones making laws doesn't mean that they are not serving women's needs. Who could deny that lawmakers in America are almost continually bending over backwards to please women and feminist groups?

Thanks to an active readership, we've been able to track more anti-male portrayals in the media. Anna wrote in about a demeaning ad she saw in Parents Magazine, Dec. 2001 issue: "It's for Secret anti-perspirant for women. It reads.. "It's gentle. It's sensitive. It's strong...Men, take note." The "men take note" is in larger and bolder print. I wrote to Proctor and Gamble through their web site I will also write a hard copy." cheddah and bledso both wrote in about a new Norelco electric shaver ad on TV. It shows an entertainment center fall apart, presumably due to the man's incompetence at building it, and the announcer ends it with something along the lines of, "...because men can never do anything right." The Media Watch page has been updated accordingly.

Donald Cameron writes "An article in the National Post reports: "By nature, men overreact to stress...male fetuses release double the amount of the stress hormone, cortisol, than female fetuses do. This "exaggerated stressful response" in males before birth means men may be "over-responsive to stress" after birth." I have to wonder if there is hope for men in light of this kind of research. It is good to know about the causes of diseases and disorders. I just somehow feel that we are headed into some strange territory (dare I say "Brave New World?") where genetic research can be used to make wild claims that go beyond the findings of a study. They could just as easily have said that women underreact to stress, could they not?"

Neil Steyskal writes "A therapist has written to Dear Abby to advise an abused man to leave his wife and take his children. The therapist isn't aware that the man will have to be very lucky to keep his kids, even if he has a well documented case. This is something Dear Abby needs to know. Go to the "reply" link on the site."

In yet another slam against manhood in the United Kingdom, the British government is granting women the right to know the salaries of their male co-workers. The government is painting this as an initiative to promote pay equity. It sounds more like a legal invasion of the privacy of one sex by another, and further attempts to force men into smaller pay scales no matter their years of service and quality of work. The story can be read here.

rparent32 writes "A woman in Hong Kong was released by a judge, who felt the nine months
she had already spent in jail was enough. She drugged her husband, and cut off his penis, when he arrived at their place to discuss a separation. I don't now about the laws in Hong Kong, but this sounds similar to a story in Vancouver, Canada. A women thought her husband was cheating on her, so she got her revenge by hacking off his penis. She was charged with common assault. This charge is usually reserved for such things a punching someone with a fist. She was convicted, and given probation."

Rams sent in this article from PaperClip Communications. It announces that Chestnut Hill College, a Catholic liberal arts college, will be ending its policy of admitting only women beginning in the Fall of 2003. The reason? "Declining interest in all-women’s institutions." CHC President Sister Carol Jean Vale said, "It was the most responsible decision we could make...I think a good number of the remaining women’s colleges will either merge with a larger institution or become coed."

Chivalry (or, the placement of women on a figurative pedestal) has long been blamed by feminism for women's inequality with men in a variety of areas, but is it also responsible for modern inequalities which directly affect men? Unequal sentencing for similar crimes all the way down to unequal pricing for goods and services could conceivably be blamed on this relic from ages old we call "chivalry." They say it's dead. Are they right? Join us at 9:30 p.m. EST for an online chat on the subject, and we'll attempt to determine the truth.