Neil Steyskal writes "The IRS rules currently contain at least six incentives for women to divorce their husbands. For example, he is taxed on child support even though she has the use of the money. Now, the national debate on pensions and Social Security reform is providing feminists with the opening to establish even more divorce incentives. Here's one."

Anonymous User writes "Time to raid the accounts of NCPs in Tennessee. This person is so ignorant of the true amount owed and where it actually goes it's appalling. No need to worry about the life of the [non-custodial parent], just raid raid raid. Please write this editor so that wrongs can be righted." In fact, the author of this editorial advocates the same backward beliefs about child support collection which have recently led other states to re-examine their systems. You may contact the editor here.

This Sunday, March 13 the New Hampshire chapter of the National Congress for Fathers and Children will be meeting in the Newington Town Hall starting at 7 PM. Among the agenda items are updates on the status of the NH Men's Commission Bill, as well as other pending bills related to ex-parte restraining orders, shared parenting, child support, and no-fault divorce reform. For more info contact Mike Genoulis at: geancfc@juno.com.

Uberganger writes "This is an article from The Ottawa Citizen, found via divorceport.com, written by Dave Brown, the Citizen's senior editor. It describes how Judge Jean-Francois Gosselin 'stepped away' from a preposterous DV case because the definition of violence is now too wide. The case ended with no further action, and crown prosecutors are now 'expected to exercise greater discretion'. It's a welcome touch of sanity in Canada's demented DV landscape." Thanks also to ronn for submitting this article.

disclaimer writes "The Hefty trash bag ad bashing men is back on the air for another run. I saw the 'men are trash' Hefty ad on the evening of Tuesday, March 5th on CBS. Even though we wrote letters of complaint about the commercial, it appears that Hefty didn't listen. I thought that those who wrote Hefty should know that Hefty has turned a deaf ear to us." Perhaps they need another reminder?

ronn sent us this link to an editorial by Mike LaSalle of Men's News Daily. LaSalle feels that "International Women's Day," March 8, has been co-opted by radical feminists to pursue their agenda and that a counterbalance is needed - an International Men's Day. LaSalle announces that this weekend, MND will restore some balance to the rampant statistical manipulations and misinformation that radical feminists have used to advance their agenda on days such as International Women's Day. Keep an eye on Mike's site.

In tonight's Mensactivism.org on-line chat we will discuss identity politics, which holds that only members of a particular group, such as women, can understand issues of importance to that group. (For an overview and critique of this political tactic, see Wendy McElroy's recent Foxnews.com column.) Join us at 9:30 PM EST tonight (3/6) in the MANN chat room.

Neil Steyskal sent us this Boston Globe editorial and writes "The Yates case is a good platform for pointing out the post-divorce psychosis that affects many men. Maybe creating this new term will raise the consciousness of reporters who find excuses for women's violence, but not for men's. In this column, Ellen Goodman comes close to recognizing this pattern." I almost fell of my chair when I read this editorial from Goodman. I've known her to be a misandrist belittler of men's rights in the Globe for as long as I can remember.

CJ submitted this story and writes "It's a slippery slope in MA for people accused of domestic violence. It is now a felony for aggravated assault, which sounds like a good idea, but in MA there are so many laws that view domestic issues in a 'a priori' (before the facts) manner that I feel that this is one step closer to martial law and will be used as new weapon to wreck havoc with men's freedom. Jane Swift is shameless in her attempts to stay in office... how long now before a shove turns into aggravated assault is in the eye of the vindictive family courts that are over-run with radical feminists."

SJones writes "Berlin is opening the first battered men's shelter in Germany. I found the article in Yahoo! Oddly Enough, which shows what they think of violence against men and men's issues in general. The article is here." The "Oddly Enough" section is reserved for "fringe" news stories, and it does say a lot about the public perception of abused men that this story was placed in this section.

This article in the Washington Post reports that a federal judge has struck down the U.S. Army's equal opportunity policy, which appears to have promoted women and minorities at the expense of white male officers. The Army's written direction to promotion boards that urges them to consider the "past personal or institutional discrimination" faced by women and minorities is unconstitutional because the policy does not order the board also to consider possible discrimination against white men, the judge found. This sounds like an important victory for Lt. Col. Raymond Saunders, who has fought this battle for the past three years.

Wendy McElroy's latest Fox News column explores the core problem many of us see with mainstream feminism: "you're not a woman, so you just can't understand." McElroy examines identity politics in all activism, and points out that men and women, although different, do have common ground, and each should value the opinion of the other, The parallel in feminism is that, although a man does not experience womanhood, he nevertheless understands injustice. Depending on his life experiences, a man may empathize with a rape victim more deeply than many women do. Moreover, like the doctor, men can have perspectives on "women's issues" which are valuable precisely because they are different. And "womanhood" is not so fragile as to be damaged by listening to the opinions of men.

Glenn Sacks wrote a great piece on shared parenting in support of a proposed Tennessee bill that would make shared physical custody the default for divorcing parents. "Advocates of the bill emphasize that it will lower the divorce rate, since parents won't be rewarded by the courts for being the first one to terminate a struggling relationship. In addition, they say, it encourages cooperation and even reconciliation because each parent knows that, barring proof of abuse, they will not be able to drive the other parent out of their children's lives." I hope activists in TN are organizing well in support of this bill, which will help many fathers, but most of all, children.

Here we go again, jumping straight in the fray of hypocrisy and heresy on the subject of Andrea Yates. At least this article points out the double standards involved, although she wants Russell Yates imprisoned as well (can anybody say fall guy?), but I think you people can read between the lines. While the article is questionable in places, it looks like the Andrea Yates story will be making debate for quite some time.

Since the questions are starting to roll in about the comment moderation system, which is in the process of being enabled, I'd like to direct people to some documentation about the system. Unfortunately, I don't have the time this week to rewrite the docs and make them specific to this site, so instead I will point you to Slashdot's Comments and Moderation FAQ. It's long and complex, but worth reading. I'm sure people will still have questions, so feel free to ask them under this story, and I'll do my best to answer them.