Rand T. writes "An article about the pro-feminist bias in scientific research of sex-differences and the media that report it:

Over here"

Anonymous User writes "The Boston Herald ran an article titled "Judge to hubby: Forget prenup, pay up" in their December 30, 2004 edition. The first sentence of the article sums it all up nicely: "In a possibly precedent-setting case, the state Appeals Court has ruled that an ex-wife is entitled to alimony even though she signed a prenuptial agreement waiving it." The upshot? Men: don't get married!"

ArtflDgr writes: "BP News has a commentary on:

FIRST-PERSON: Lesbians raising sons; got a problem with that?

It can be read here HERE



Click "Read more..." for more commentary from the submitter.

Linucs writes "You can read more about the non-existing child previously discussed here."

dschmidt writes "The Associated Press is reporting that a Houston Judge has overturned Andrea Yates' conviction for murdering her children (all boys)."

NPR has a piece on how Wells College in upstate New York is going co-ed. The audio clip is available form this page.

Amazing, some of the comments to be heard, all the while the interviewer speaks with a tone of sympathy in her voice. When all-male schools went co-ed in the 1960s, few in the press seemed sympathetic to the complaints of male students. More of the same: Boys bad, girls good.

Well, didn't we just have to expect it? Here it is, gang. Surprised it took them this long, actually.

Roy writes "The N.O.W. site has posted their typical P.C. feminazi take on the recent three-part series in the Washington Post on pregnancy and homicide.

Note all the usual feminist deceptions ... omit critical information, selectively quote the so-called research, ignore voluminous rebuttals and even the Post's own admission that the articles were poorly written, and finally, lay the groundwork for yet another DV myth and the necessary hysteria.

It's the usual standard of integrity we've come to expect from the Stalinist sisterhood, though one might agree with N.O.W.’s concluding statement – "It's not too late to save the next victim..." .. OF FEMINIST LIES!

Garth writes "Two teens, a mother and father to be, decide to end a pregnancy using the do-it-yourself method. Guess who gets arrested?"

Linucs writes "Straight from the Military.com: "The Josephson Institute of Ethics, after conducting a national survey, found that “43 percent of high school and 37 percent of middle school boys believe it is ok to hit or threaten a person that makes them angry.” The same survey found that “75 percent of all boys and over 60 percent of all teenage girls said they hit someone in the last 12 months because they were angry.” These are the same students that are recruited into the Army. Think these anger issues are resolved before they enter the military? Think they won’t be a problem in the future? Think again." At last, we found the other half of violence..."

Interesting page on the NYTimes.com site. A reporter interviewed a number of scientific persons regarding decidedly non-scientific topics via the question "What do you believe is true even though you cannot prove it?" and came up with some fascinating replies. The last one in particular was quite noteworthy. Click the "Read more..." link for it.

Tirryb writes "News.com.au reports here that a recent study has found that intelligent women are less likely to be married than less intelligent ones. All through the article, this is blamed on men - men are intimidated by intelligent women, men prefer 'the little woman' to stay at home and be like their mothers. It's all mens fault. Almost nothing is made of the opposite finding - that less intelligent men are far less likely to be married, and this certainly isn't blamed on women. Then right at the end, the quoted expert finally admits, "We find more women now are choosing not to have children or get married.". Hmm."

This is part of a doctor's journal regarding his experience as an intern. It has some really good information re circumcision in it. Send it on to anyone who tells you it's "medically necessary" or "advantageous" to do this to an infant.

Linucs writes "From the Guardian: "'Young women now drive the decisions on what to buy and, unlike older women, it is she, and not her boyfriend or husband, who decides how much to spend,' said Young." That looks fine, as long as she spends her own money... "But Joanna is playing hard to get. She may be the darling of the corporations, but, despite her education and strong opinions, she has left the politicians confounded by her reluctance to vote." - And what will happen to the dumb, uneducated men? "'Young women are the great untapped power in today's society: it is not an exaggeration to say future democracy relies on engaging their voices and their votes in a way we have so far failed to do,'" - Big idea: let's place some voting booths inside Body Shop. "'The feminisation of the high street has been so pronounced in the last five years that men are being chased away: your average heterosexual man feels completely out of place on the high street now,' said Experian's Patrick Gray. 'It is only "feminised men", or metrosexual man, who dares to face it. Most men prefer the internet to real-life shops now.'" - I surely feel out of place while reading The Guardian..."

Getting back to things in India, the mob justice is picking up in pace. While reading the article, notice that for a so called "tradtional" society, they're already making excuses for the women who go around killing, and the feminists are making excuses for them as well. At this rate feminism will be entrenched there soon enough, due to them exploiting traditional chivalry. Are you starting to see how the radfems subvert cultures by playing on traditional chivalry yet?