AFG writes "For the third week in a row, Barbara Kay of the National Post has slammed Canada's feminist family courts and politicians. This week, she explains why the lives of so many dads are destroyed through divorce, and thus, she goes on to offer solutions to the problem."

Stan Gaver writes "We all know how sexist and feminist-manipulated mainstream dictionaries have been in the past. For example, many didn't and some still don't include a definition for "misandry".

My son brought something to my attention today that sure surprised the hell out of me and brought a smile to my face. Check out the Word of the Day on Dictionary.com for June 29, at http://dictionary.reference.com/wordoftheday/archive/2006/06/29.html. Check out that first example for the word "timorous"... you won't believe it!

Put a smile on YOUR face today!"

Last night on the local public TV station, I saw Einstein's Wife, about Albert's first wife. It is implying strongly that she really was the one behind the theory of relativity as well as nearly everything else he did. It even has a poll asking viewers if they think she "collaborated" with Einstein for the creation of the momentus series of papers he published in 1905.

I knew it would come to pass. Soon Napolean Bonaparte will in fact have been a female, and every great world leader (the hero ones anyway) will have in fact been women or controlled by women.

Hitler and Stalin of course will remain men.

AngryMan writes "A 17-year old girl has been given life for the cold-blooded killing of an elderly woman. Her plan was to kill a defenceless old woman for her money. This killing of a neighbour was a test run. Was she desperate for money? No. Her father is a millionaire. He has now disowned her, and she will serve at least 20 years."

John Doe writes "A significant victory for fathers' rights in the UK: The Times reports that Fathers (and I would assume mothers) will now have the right to talk openly about family court cases.

Something to celebrate for a change...?"

AngryMan writes "A 49-year-old female teacher has been jailed for 4 years 3 months for repeatedly raping a 14-year-old boy. The article call it rape, doesn't call her a paedophile, and doesn't complain that the sentence is too lenient. How many years would a male teacher get for having sex with a 14-year-old girl? That's the female discount for you, guys!"

Tumescent writes "It's not certain why Larry Ellison of Oracle changed his mind on the donation but it looks like the feminists just cost their school a cool $100M for running Summers out for no good reason."

Chuck H writes "Woman recants story of being sexually assaulted by her boyfriend. Now the court runs with the ball of false witness. Sounds like Bell County Texas all over again. I can't believe it's happening in Chippewa Falls, Wisconsin. I am ashamed to live here!"

Ed. note: Since the Leader-Telegram has a particularly thorough (ie, annoying) registration process, the story is posted in its entirety under "Read more..."

Marc A. writes "This decision (.pdf file) is a must-read. It just came down yesterday from the 2nd District Court of Appeal (Los Angeles) and overturns a disgusting decision by a dependency court judge, making it very clear how shocked the appellate court is a the lower court judge's attitude toward this potential father who wanted a DNA test before the child was permanently placed in foster care.

A drug-addicted mother couldn't care for the child, so the child was placed in foster care temporarily. Mother didn't give names of possible fathers, but later told Jesus H. he might be the dad. Jesus immediately comes to the DCFS, just before the child turns 1 and just before the court permanently places the child in foster care. DCFS refuses to let Jesus see the child but tells him to appear at the upcoming hearing. He did. Ultimately the court refuses him a DNA test, treats him like garbarge, and acts like he should have come forward sooner. Even the child's own attorney waffles on its position. Jesus appealed on his own with a handwritten notice of appeal. DCFS fought him and even tried to argue his notice was insufficient. The appellate court wrote this scathing decision reversing the judge's order and repeatedly quoting the judge to show how outrageous her reasoning was."

Anonymous User writes "This crap made me cancel my LA Times subscription. This elitist piece of trash dictates to women on what they should be from her ivory tower. I would be really curious where she got her money from... perhaps her first husband?

EXCERPT: 'Never do yourself what you can pay someone else to do, because that then frees you up to do what you're good at," said Hirshman of housework. "When workmen come to my house and say, 'So what's the matter with the lamp?' I say, 'OK, you stand up in front of a class of 200 people and explain to them about Plato, and I will figure out what's wrong with the lamp...For many years she was a union side labor lawyer, and bargaining in marriage plays a big role in Hirshman's philosophy. For example: "You want more children?" she said a woman could say to her husband, "Then start doing the laundry."'

LIKE THE GUY WANTS MORE OF A FINANCIAL BURDEN AND THE WIFE IS GRACIOUS ENOUGH TO HAVE ANOTHER KID FOR HIM..."

Roy writes "This one's so over the top it begs belief! An Australian grandmother who skinned and cooked her de facto husband will plead with a court to overturn her life sentence - because she is a woman. The mother of four pleaded guilty to murder after hubby's body was found on the floor of his Aberdeen home in the Hunter Valley in 2000. She worked as a slicer and packer at Aberdeen Abattoir and her lover had been carefully skinned and his skin hung on a meat hook in a doorway at the house. His decapitated head was found in a pot on the stove. The table had been laid for dinner with name cards for Mr Price's three children and parts of his buttocks cooked and served up with vegetables and gravy on dinner plates. Her solicitor refused to comment on the grounds of her appeal, due to be heard this week, but it is understood it involves innovative grounds, including that she is a woman."

Return of the King writes "A CEO is forced to resign after he invited a fellow female executive to accompany him on his sailboat and shared frustrations about his marriage with her. This netted Georgina Fisk, the accuser, (now corporate swindler) $1.14 million to settle a sexual harassment case which can not be empirically proven in a court of law. Feminist jurisprudence is running rampant, time to fix a broken system."

This year we begin to reform the Violence
Against Women Act, to stop the injustices, to protect our families, and to save
our children.

The name of our campaign is “Truth and
Consequences: Election 2006.” Our objective is simple: To meet with
candidates in every single district around the country, explain the abuses of
VAWA, and ask for their support to request Congressional hearings right after
the November 7 election.

Click "Read more..." for more.

I am going to give a heads-up for you all before reading this column in the Waco Tribune. The columnist, one Rowland Nethaway, is stating categorically and in all seriousness that it's just fine, if not also perfectly fair, for boys to be left behind in education, drugged to keep them "calm", etc. He also repeats a few feminist myths such as the "Rule of Thumb" myth which has been debunked repeatedly. Be forewarned, some of you may find this article so infuriating you will want to do violence to the computer monitor in front of you.

Well now that I have prepped you for it, I want to encourage everyone to write him at RNethaway-at-wacotrib.com, discussing your opinion of his essay.

You know, I wasn't sure whether to post this link or not. She is a great pro IRL driver; there is no reason at all for her to start peddling her femaleness/looks as a commodity in this fashion.

Next time a feminist tells you women do this sort of thing because "they have to", send them the link. 'Danica the Pro Racer' had absolutely no reason, except perhaps vanity or insecurity, to start being being 'Danica the SI Model'. Sad, really.