Story here.

Kim Gandy has nightmares about Phyllis Schlafly. She is politically incorrect, and I love it! Even though she's 81 years old, the woman still knows how to battle the feminist hypocrisy. Excerpt:

"LEWISTON - For four decades, right-wing icon Phyllis Schlafly has been an anti-feminist spokeswoman for the national conservative movement.

Schlafly, now 81, brought her long-running campaign to Bates College on Wednesday night in a lecture titled "Conservativism vs. Feminism: The Great Debate," which played to a near-capacity crowd of more than 135 students and visitors at Chase Hall."

Story here.

I wonder if "Sudden Infant Death Syndrome" is often used as an exuse to murder an infant. Excerpt:

"A 49-year-old woman who was long the focus of police investigating the suspicious deaths of three of her children was charged with murder Wednesday, accused of smothering one of her sons in 1980.

Ronald Winters III was five months old when he died in 1980 while the family was living in Otisco in Onondaga County. His death was attributed to Sudden Infant Death Syndrome."

Story here.

It remains to be seen if they'll actually be punished, but the authorities must let society know, women must be held accountable when exposing sexuality in the presence of a child. Excerpt:

'Pam and Penny Crane, 29, are accused of snapping topless pictures in front of the child, a relative of the sisters.

The women were wearing thong underwear and hosiery, while the 5-year-old appeared in some of the photos and may have snapped one of the two sisters topless, Lt. Jeff Johnston said.

"Why they would take those pictures, I have no idea," said Sheboygan County district attorney Joe DeCecco, who called the case creepy. "But then to go one step further and to be exposing their breasts to the child and buttocks to the child."'

Mike Geanoulis submitted the following to be distributed:

In a recent effort to justify the 17 million dollars it spends annually to force obligors to pay court ordered child support obligations or suffer the loss of certain privileges and freedoms, the New Hampshire Division of Child Support Services (DCSS) published, among other things, data showing that 64% of ordered support was collected for all accounts - no small achievement, it would seem. The report, designed to convey a sense of satisfaction for taxpayers fed up with the deadbeat problem, was picked up from the Associated Press by newspapers across the state.

For those familiar with the larger set of facts on the matter, however, the report seemed more like a misleading accounting of failure and ineptitude. (read more to continue...)

Article here. Excerpt:

"A woman in America has been charged with assault and trespass after allegedly biting her boyfriend on the genitals while he slept.

According to authorities, 25-year-old Amanda Rall broke into her boyfriend's house while he was asleep on March 22. She then administered a bite to what reports describe as 'his private area.'"

Article here. Excerpt:

'It's called the Promoting Responsible Fatherhood Initiative, and the Bush administration doles out up to $50 million annually to fund its programs to build job skills and help fathers connect better with their children. But the National Organization for Women says the effort is illegal because it's only about men.

NOW and Legal Momentum, another advocacy group, filed complaints yesterday with the Department of Health and Human Services alleging sex discrimination in the initiative that is funding about 100 programs this year.'

Story here. Excerpt:

"A WOMAN terrorised a man she falsely claimed had raped her after a one-night stand five years earlier.

Debbie Oldham, 27, went to the man's flat in Glasgow's West End with three masked men and her rottweiler dog.

Oldham demanded cash, and the 25-year-old victim was threatened, assaulted and had possessions stolen and trashed."

Story here. Excerpt:

"Maurice Kondell was helping out behind the counter at a Wendy's fast food outlet on May 19, 2004, when a team of police officers walked in, clamped handcuffs on his wrists and led him away to face sexual assault charges.

Reeling in shock and humiliation, Mr. Kondell -- the first black person to become a part-owner of a Wendy's franchise -- learned that a staff member claimed he had thrust his hand down her pants one evening during a cleanup."

Story here. Excerpt:

"Presidential candidate Hillary Rodham Clinton declared Wednesday that if you look up the word "feminist" in a dictionary, you'll find her."

Asked if she viewed herself as a feminist, Clinton said by the standard definition, yes.

"If you look in the dictionary, the word feminist means someone who believes in equal rights for women in society, in the economy, the political process — generally believes in the equality of women. And I certainly believe in the equality of women," she said.

Crazy, irresponsible, stupid, or all three? If caught, will she actually be charged with any crimes? Will the media fawn all over her? Stay tuned! Video report here.

Article here:

'The arrest of two women teachers on charges of having sex with their male students has brought cries of lingering racism in one of South Carolina's most conservative counties and evoked some of the South's oldest and deepest-seated racial taboos.

Both women are white. The boys - six in all - are black.

...

"If this had been black teachers, they would not be out of jail right now," said Corinnie Young, a 49-year-old bookstore employee who is black.

Some blacks shudder to think what would have happened if the teachers were black men and the students were white girls.

At the risk of sounding like one of those MSM people who spend more time pointing up the flaws of other media outfits rather than reporting news, I just have to post this. Now given that the two combatants were female, what happens? No one is fired. Now of course had this been a male-female case, or a male-male case, one or both people (most likely all males) would have been sacked that day. But when the violaters are both women? The system freezes up and shuts down, incapabale of handling the paradoxes. Net result: an assault is not redressed, and the double-standard goes on merrily unchecked. Excerpt:

'A catfight at The New York Times Friday still has staffers in shock.

The dustup between two female editors in the Styles department disrupted work on the Thursday and Sunday Styles sections as co-workers froze at the fracas.

Article here. Excerpt:

'U.N. health agencies recommended Wednesday that HETEROSEXUAL men undergo circumcision because of "compelling" evidence that it can reduce their chances of contracting HIV by up to 60 percent.
...
The public health impact is likely to be most rapid where there is a high rate of HIV infection among men having sex with WOMEN.'

SO BASICALLY ME MUST CONCLUDE THAT MEN SHOULD BE MUTILATED FOR THE SAFETY AND PLEASURE OF WOMEN. HMMM, ISN'T FEMALE CIRCUMCISION WRONG BECAUSE ITS DONE FOR THE BENEFIT OF MEN?

Story here. Excerpt:

'A British servicewoman detained along with 14 other sailors will be released "within a day or two",...

Faye Turney is the only woman among the eight Royal Navy sailors and seven marines [taken prisoner]...'

BOY, THEY SURE PLAY THE WOMAN CARD WHEN IT SUITS THEM. MEN TRULY ARE CONSIDERED EXPENDABLE.

File this article in the 'bizarre' category. I had to post it mostly because the idiot agreed to pay $1,250 a month for the rest of his ex-wife's life (which is always fun when the guy statistically dies first, hey, she's still alive, who cares if the guy is dead, she needs her money). Especially when you consider how much sex-change operations costs, I wonder how the court justified her needing the money. Excerpt:

"Lawrence Roach agreed to pay alimony to the woman he divorced, not the man she became after a sex change, his lawyers argued Tuesday in an effort to end the payments. But the ex-wife's attorneys said the operation doesn't alter the agreement."