[an error occurred while processing this directive]
Wife jailed for plotting to kill husband
posted by Matt on 12:17 PM October 26th, 2005
Domestic Violence AngryMan writes "A British woman has been jailed for trying to hire a hitman to kill her husband. The saddest part of the story is that her husband forgives her and wants her back. Story here"

Alleged assault on Tonya Harding | First Female Designated "Sexually Dangerous"  >

  
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Sounds like some of us here. (Score:0, Troll)
by Anonymous User on 12:55 PM October 26th, 2005 EST (#2)
Sounds like some of us here who insist women must have the power to vote and berate those men who post otherwise.
Not me (Score:2)
by Clancy (long_ponytail@yahoo.com) on 01:35 PM October 26th, 2005 EST (#8)
I think this site should re-title itself into "Repeal the 19th amendment news network". A web site devoted entirely to the sublimation of women the world over. "Back to the kitchen with you, wench!" would be our creed. "What? You're not pregnant?" And, "Where'd you get those shoes, anyway?" would be our mantras. Hey, wait a minute, don't we already have those pesky women under our massive thumbs? What was I thinking? If only the severely oppressed women that post here would trade places with their Islamist counterparts for just ONE day they would find that internet sites like these don't exist. They don't have to. They don't let their uppity women talk, or read, or write or breathe. I believe that you would not even hear of a trial for a woman accused of hiring a hit man to whack her hubby. Well, she might get a fair trial and then a swift hanging with a new rope. I don't think Islam has ever heard of the 19th amendment. Perhaps our esteemed anonymous poster would like to travel abroad and educate our brothers. Please email back with a full report! Don't forget to hit "Enter" before the trap door falls.
Time to ban this troll. (Score:1)
by EvilPundit on 05:46 PM October 26th, 2005 EST (#17)
http://evilpundit.com
This crap is hijacking all the discussion threads.

Admins, please delete any posts by this person. Otherwise the site will lose much of this value.
-- Evil Pundit of Doom!
Re:Sounds like some of us here. (Score:0)
by Anonymous User on 01:32 AM October 27th, 2005 EST (#23)
"Sounds like some of us here who insist women must have the power to vote and berate those men who post otherwise".

You're a real piece of work alright.

Actually, it's the mantra you keep posting over and over, dosen't matter what the article is about, it's "Ban women's right to vote"....each and every time....over and over and over again.

Like I said yesterday, you're behavior is nothing more than grade school kid antics.

You know it as well as the rest of us...Your only intent here is to troll, plain and simple.

And don't pull a feminist and try to turn my statements around.

Grow the F*** up, moron.
Re:Sounds like some of us here. (Score:0)
by Anonymous User on 07:11 AM October 27th, 2005 EST (#27)
Death To women's Rights.
Death To women's Liberties.
Death To women's Freedoms.
Re:Sounds like some of us here. (Score:2)
by Tirryb on 08:43 AM October 27th, 2005 EST (#31)
This is getting old, real fast.

Trolls like this will ruin this site if there's no ability to shut them out. Valid discussion is one thing, mad troll-spittle is another.

Can't we end anonymous posting and then ban any user who abuses their membership..?
Re:Sounds like some of us here. (Score:1)
by Ragtime on 09:19 AM October 27th, 2005 EST (#32)
"Can't we end anonymous posting and then ban any user who abuses their membership..?"

All registered users, you included Tirryb, get 'moderator' points that you can use to moderate the score of other posts.

The moderation system is the way the users of the board can be self-policing. That way, those who use this forum can choose for themselves to elevate good, relevant posts or reduce posts like the ones from the current disruptive asshole-child down below visible level.

Spend a mod pont and set those posts to 'Troll' to reduce them to a score of -1.

Also spend a point to elevate good posts by selecting things like 'Informative,' or 'insightful.'

We have the mechanism to do this ourselves; there's no need to bring in a higher authority.

Ragtime

The Uppity Wallet

The opinions expressed above are my own, but you're welcome to adopt them.

In my best Grover personna... (Score:2)
by Clancy (long_ponytail@yahoo.com) on 04:17 PM October 27th, 2005 EST (#44)
I DID NOT KNOW THAT! Thanks, to you and your uppity wallet, Ragtime.
What would Jesus do? (Score:2)
by Clancy (long_ponytail@yahoo.com) on 01:08 PM October 26th, 2005 EST (#3)
"Whether it is a result of your manipulation of him I do not know, and cannot comment. But if the reconciliation is genuine, you are indeed a fortunate woman."

Well, he'd probably forgive her but I also think he'd use his miraculous powers to grow eyes in the back of his head.

Jailing Quinton, he said, five years was the least he could impose, even in the light of her guilty plea and her husband's forgiveness.

I can't help but wonder, what is the least sentence imposed for dirty rotten men that are besotted with their wive's 20 something female coworkers?

Angryman, is the Tower of London used for just such offenses? Isn't a jail term in that correctional facility usually followed up by a separation of the head from the shoulders? Looks like women get the standard pat on the back. In the US, that would translate to - 5 year sentence, 1 year served, the remaining 4 years off for good behavior.

"I read the news today, Oh boy!" Well, Yesterday, actually where a woman received 110 year sentence for child abuse on her children. But, GOOD NEWS - it wasn't her fault. Can anyone guess whose fault it was? Hands? By the way, HE got a paltry 200 year sentence.
Re:What would Jesus do? (Score:0)
by Anonymous User on 01:17 PM October 26th, 2005 EST (#6)
"Women are diagnosed, men are demonized".

  Thundercloud.
  "Hoka hey!"
Re:What would Jesus do? (Score:2)
by AngryMan (end_misandryNOSPAM@yahoo.co.uk) on 03:30 PM October 26th, 2005 EST (#12)
Nicely put, TC

"Sunlight is said to be the best of disinfectants." Louis D Brandeis, Supreme Court Justice, 1913
Re:What would Jesus do? (Score:0)
by Anonymous User on 01:32 PM October 27th, 2005 EST (#40)
Thanks but I can't claim it as my own saying. It was in a recent article that was posted here on the site.
It's a good saying, though, and one I have suggested we use often.

  Thundercloud.
  "Hoka hey!"
Re:What would Jesus do? (Score:2)
by AngryMan (end_misandryNOSPAM@yahoo.co.uk) on 04:16 PM October 26th, 2005 EST (#14)
Angryman, is the Tower of London used for just such offenses? Isn't a jail term in that correctional facility usually followed up by a separation of the head from the shoulders?

Well, that's how we used to do things 400 years ago. These days we give men jail time and women therapy.

"Sunlight is said to be the best of disinfectants." Louis D Brandeis, Supreme Court Justice, 1913
Didn't Henry the VIII ...... (Score:2)
by Clancy (long_ponytail@yahoo.com) on 06:24 PM October 26th, 2005 EST (#18)
house some of his wives there just before his divorce attorney brought the axe down on their neck? (sorry, it's been a long time since I studied English herstory). Now THAT'S what I call an evil white male oppressor. I think he makes the rest of us evil oppressors look like the boy scout that carried the little old lady across the street because she didn't want an escort.
Re:Didn't Henry the VIII ...... (Score:2)
by AngryMan (end_misandryNOSPAM@yahoo.co.uk) on 02:52 AM October 27th, 2005 EST (#24)
He had 6 wives, and the order was :-

Divorced,
Beheaded
Died
Divorced
Beheaded
Survived (him)

Yes, the Tower was the place where it happened. He hired a master executioner from France to cut the head of Anne Bolynn (wifey no.2)


"Sunlight is said to be the best of disinfectants." Louis D Brandeis, Supreme Court Justice, 1913
Re:Didn't Henry the VIII ...... (Score:0)
by Anonymous User on 01:33 PM October 27th, 2005 EST (#41)
And we women think we have it rough, now...!

  Jinx
Rape your wife. (Score:0, Troll)
by Anonymous User on 07:13 AM October 27th, 2005 EST (#28)
If your wife says "no" then rape her. According to the Bible she must do as you say. You have claim to her.
Re:Rape your wife. (Score:2)
by AngryMan (end_misandryNOSPAM@yahoo.co.uk) on 09:52 AM October 27th, 2005 EST (#34)
Destroy your wife's mental health.
Destroy your family.
Spend the rest of your life in prison.
Good plan. You're a genius.

"Sunlight is said to be the best of disinfectants." Louis D Brandeis, Supreme Court Justice, 1913
Re:Rape your wife. (Score:0)
by Anonymous User on 01:35 PM October 27th, 2005 EST (#42)
Go rape yourself bucket-head.
(Not you, AngryMan, the troll!)

  Jinx
This A**hole Is A Troll And Should Be Ignored..But (Score:2)
by Luek on 07:05 PM October 27th, 2005 EST (#45)
It is productive to bring up the recent feminist inspired weird legal concept of marital rape.

It is central to the marriage institution that sex will be a major part of marriage. This is one of the reasons we have marriage in the first damn place along with having a workable social matrix to raise the children that result.

There is too much potential for false accusations in having the state hold rape laws and penalties over the head of the husband. For instance, what if he doesn't withdraw in a timely manner if she says she doesn't want to anymore? Do we need to have a law saying that a rape has occurred if the husband doesn't withdraw in say less that 5 seconds after she says stop? This would be ludicrous. All marital rape laws should be revoked. If there is a problem in the marriage for the woman then she has more than enough avenues to get out of the marriage.
Repeal the 19th ammendment. (Score:0)
by Anonymous User on 07:20 AM October 27th, 2005 EST (#29)
Repeal the 19th ammendment so women's voting rights can be recinded. Women voting has caused harm to men (as we have seen throughout the last century) and would benifit us in that we could remove the divorce laws, lower the marraige age of girls to menarche (12-14), and get rid of abortion.
Re:Repeal the 19th ammendment. (Score:2)
by AngryMan (end_misandryNOSPAM@yahoo.co.uk) on 09:55 AM October 27th, 2005 EST (#35)
Hmmm. Maybe I was wrong. Maybe you really are a pedophile.

"Sunlight is said to be the best of disinfectants." Louis D Brandeis, Supreme Court Justice, 1913
Re:Repeal the 19th ammendment. (Score:0)
by Anonymous User on 01:36 PM October 27th, 2005 EST (#43)
I wouldn't be surprised if he/she was. (a paedophile)

  Jinx
Lower the marraige age to menarche. (Score:0)
by Anonymous User on 07:22 AM October 27th, 2005 EST (#30)
Lower the marraige age to when females are able to have children rather then when they've allready been fucked 100s of times and now the new husband can pick at the scraps.
Re:Lower the marraige age to menarche. (Score:2)
by AngryMan (end_misandryNOSPAM@yahoo.co.uk) on 09:57 AM October 27th, 2005 EST (#36)
Oh, dear. Been crossed in love, have we? If you are so keen on marrying a virgin, I take it you are also a virgin? Otherwise explain to me which women guys like you are going to sleep with before marriage?

"Sunlight is said to be the best of disinfectants." Louis D Brandeis, Supreme Court Justice, 1913
Re:Lower the marraige age to menarche. (Score:0)
by Anonymous User on 10:22 AM October 27th, 2005 EST (#38)
Whoever the moderator on this site is needs to start tracking the idiot that keeps posting ridiculous ideas because it's not isolated to a single story anymore. The rest of us can't really control it, so I'm hoping the site moderators can look into it? Thanks.
How about .... (Score:2)
by Clancy (long_ponytail@yahoo.com) on 01:12 PM October 26th, 2005 EST (#4)
Death to women that pay to have their INNOCENT husbands rubbed out? Would that fit in with your extremely tiresome and myopic view of the world?
Re:How about .... (Score:0)
by Anonymous User on 01:19 PM October 26th, 2005 EST (#7)
Ofcourse.
Death To women who try to kill or maim their husband , period.

ACK! (Score:2)
by Clancy (long_ponytail@yahoo.com) on 01:36 PM October 26th, 2005 EST (#9)
How stupid of me. I forget that you are against women's rights.
Re:ACK! (Score:0)
by Anonymous User on 01:59 PM October 26th, 2005 EST (#10)
I'm mikeeusa.
Re:ACK! (Score:2)
by Clancy (long_ponytail@yahoo.com) on 02:06 PM October 26th, 2005 EST (#11)
I'm stupid. Nice to meet you mikeeusa. Think you could lay off the 19th amendment stuff for a day or 2? Tell us about yourself. Your hopes, dreams, the last romance novel you read.
Re:ACK! (Score:0, Troll)
by Anonymous User on 05:22 PM October 26th, 2005 EST (#15)
Death To women's Rights.
Re:ACK! (Score:0, Troll)
by Anonymous User on 05:37 PM October 26th, 2005 EST (#16)
I'm an opensource programmer and media person.
https://cat2.dynu.ca/ is my website

My hopes and dreams are:
1) To get rid of women's rights (19th ammendment, abortion, women being able to divorce their husband).
2) Enhance men's rights (men are to beable to take multiple wives if they wish, men are to beable to marry girls that have reached menarche (12-14yrs usually) and thus can have children).


Why the hell didn't you just say so? (Score:2)
by Clancy (long_ponytail@yahoo.com) on 07:02 PM October 26th, 2005 EST (#19)
You could of saved a lot of typing by a lot of pissed off men if you had just given a statement of the problem from the get go. I don't think you are necessarily going to win over a lot of people here. Warning, women are actually are allowed to post on this site so if you've got a problem with the vote then you are really going to hate that little factoid. Sometimes I wonder how any sympathetic woman could read some of what's written here, including mine. Most of what is written is borne from frustration and not from any deep seated hatred for the opposite sex. We actually like women. We just wish a lot of them didn't think that we like being mistaken for a linoleum floor. Your comment about 12-14 year old GIRLS might increase the length of the line of guys that would like a piece of you. Especially if any of them have daughters around that age. Maybe you should seriously consider moving on down the line.
Re:Why the hell didn't you just say so? (Score:0)
by Anonymous User on 07:44 PM October 26th, 2005 EST (#20)
If they'ed like to horde their daughters rather then marry them off then that's their problem. Females were made for men, but most men seem to have contempt for other men who wish to marry their daughters.

Fathers: your daughters are not for you, they are for another man, you have your wives.
See you later (Score:2)
by Clancy (long_ponytail@yahoo.com) on 08:41 PM October 26th, 2005 EST (#21)
I tried to reason with you. Lots of other guys want to off you. Now, I agree.
Re:See you later (Score:0)
by Anonymous User on 10:38 PM October 26th, 2005 EST (#22)
You think daughter are for their fathers? I guess the new cloning etc will come in handy then; since fathers (not giving a damn about their fellow men) wish to keep hold of their daughters till they become sucessfull bitches ... men might just have to order the girls (yes girls) they want custom made with no fathers, mothers, or anything to get in the way.
Re:ACK! (Score:2)
by AngryMan (end_misandryNOSPAM@yahoo.co.uk) on 02:56 AM October 27th, 2005 EST (#25)
When I read your comment I wondered if you were some kind of dangerous pedophile, but you're probably just some sad computer geek who's never hada girlfriend.

"Sunlight is said to be the best of disinfectants." Louis D Brandeis, Supreme Court Justice, 1913
Re:ACK! (Score:0)
by Anonymous User on 07:11 AM October 27th, 2005 EST (#26)
Your typing looks to be that of a sad feminist, the wording is identical!
Re:Death To women's Rights (Score:0)
by Anonymous User on 01:15 PM October 26th, 2005 EST (#5)
Death to stupid trolls...

  Thundercloud.
  "Hoka hey!"
Re:Death To women's Rights (Score:2)
by AngryMan (end_misandryNOSPAM@yahoo.co.uk) on 03:31 PM October 26th, 2005 EST (#13)
What freedom is that? The freedom to murder your husband? Can't you feminists even talk sense?

"Sunlight is said to be the best of disinfectants." Louis D Brandeis, Supreme Court Justice, 1913
Re:Death To women's Rights (Score:0)
by Anonymous User on 09:36 AM October 27th, 2005 EST (#33)
Every time this poster posts he/she/it (probably an "it" knowing feminists!) gets a clearly stated rebuttal. (I've included a couple new ones, how do they sound?)
--------------------------------------------

Whoever is writing these blurbs about the 19th amendment is probably a feminist, not a men’s rights activist.

They are employing a fairly simple strategy, “guerrilla tactics”. Basically, this individual is attempting to imply that repealing the right to vote is actually a goal of the men’s rights movement. This is totally bogus. By implying these false goals, the individual is transparently attempting to marginalize the movement.

How? By making the men’s movement seem very extreme, nobody will take it seriously and many will ignore its legitimate goals, which are:
    - fairness in the family courts,
    - criminalization of false accusations or child molestation/abuse (should lead to jail time, automatic loss of custody, and forfeiture of financial settlements),
  - criminalization of paternity fraud (a.k.a. “female rape”, must be severely punished)
  - end of "vicim" excuse for murder (like when women kill their husbands, and/or kids)
    - end to preferential treatment of women in the work force (“affirmative action”; that is, discrimination against middle class men in the work force),
    - end of insulting and derogatory images of men in the media and entertainment industry,
    - end to anti-boy policies in the schools,
    - the defeat of feminism,
    - etc.

I’ve NEVER heard anybody seriously advocate eliminating women’s right to vote. Don’t fall for it folks!!!

Re:Death To women's Rights (Score:2)
by AngryMan (end_misandryNOSPAM@yahoo.co.uk) on 10:20 AM October 27th, 2005 EST (#37)
Check this link out. Ring any bells? Maybe our cave-dwelling friend just has some kind of mental health problem. Bullied at school. Who knows?

"Sunlight is said to be the best of disinfectants." Louis D Brandeis, Supreme Court Justice, 1913
Here's the gist... (Score:2)
by Clancy (long_ponytail@yahoo.com) on 11:43 AM October 27th, 2005 EST (#39)
Sorry AngryMan, the link you posted did not work for me so I erased the last portion: "htmltarget=_blank" and got a hit. Anyway, I coped and pasted what I felt were the most relevant passages.

> Freenet Members,
> I am sorry to cause confusion on this list.
> If I am in the wrong place, please tell me.

Don't worry about it. Mikeeusa is just a troll that has come to bug
us for a while. He's less respected than Signal 11. Just wait a few
weeks and he'll get board and move on.

>
> Mikeeusa,
> Please do not shoot before you ask questions first.
> Also, you might want to sign with your real name so I
> know who is "cursing" me to hell.
>


Looks like the line forms on the left for those of us that want to slap this guy.
[an error occurred while processing this directive]