Title IX Challenge Rejected Without Comment

	posted by Matt on 09:15 PM June 6th, 2005
	Without a word, the Supreme Court declined to hear the latest challenge to Title IX.

<  Missing TX Student Discovered Working at a Sam's Club | Newsweek article on Marriage  >

  

This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

What the article didn't say was extent of damage (Score:1) by LSBeene on 10:31 AM June 7th, 2005 EST (#1) What the article didn't say was the EXTENT of damage (they mentions football versus wrestling) and how many men's sports programs had been cut. I guess that SHOCKING # would have been just too much. And no mention of "Women's Studies", "Women hiring initiatives", women's only scholarships etc etc .. ALL of which fall under Title IX Steven Guerrilla Gender Warfare is just Hate Speech in polite text

Re:What the article didn't say was extent of damag (Score:2) by Roy on 07:06 PM June 7th, 2005 EST (#2) Interesting that a lifetime federal appointment to the Supremes permits the arrogance to destroy male collegiate sports culture without even a rationale, or a published comment. This used to be called tyranny. Back when our enemies were not inside our own borders.... "It's a terrible thing ... to be living in fear."

[an error occurred while processing this directive]