This discussion has been archived.
No new comments can be posted.
|
 |
|
 |
 |
by DeepThought
(deep.42.thought@gmailEARTH.com)
on 08:07 PM February 12th, 2005 EST (#1)
|
|
 |
 |
 |
I like this line:
"Officials said the children feared their mother was being hurt due to their father's previous convictions for abuse and that is the reason the oldest son shot his father.
Authorities said they have not determined whether the mother was screaming for help."
So, even though it mentions in the article that the sex was consensual, it makes it ambiguous enough to subtly indicate that the boy was right for killing the father, since, well, he COULD have been abusing her. Better safe than sorry, so give your 16 year olds guns.
In addition, this is what you get when radical feminism teaches that any sex act is violence against the woman and when you create ad campains that claim "violence against women is wrong" (and teach through ommission that violence against men is acceptable). -DeepThought
---
Erase the EARTH
to gmail me.
|
|
 |
 |
|
|
 |
|
 |
 |
by Anonymous User on 03:00 PM February 13th, 2005 EST (#2)
|
|
 |
 |
 |
The father wasn't killed.
He was wounded.
Stay within the parameters of the facts.
|
|
 |
 |
|
 |
|
 |
 |
by Anonymous User on 07:10 PM February 13th, 2005 EST (#3)
|
|
 |
 |
 |
Stay within the parameters of the facts.
Pretentious. Injecting "parameters" into your sentence makes it fatuous. Omit it next time.
|
|
 |
 |
|
 |
|
 |
 |
by Anonymous User on 09:53 PM February 13th, 2005 EST (#4)
|
|
 |
 |
 |
And you should omit the ad hominem attacks.
-Dave.
|
|
 |
 |
|
 |
|
 |
 |
by The_Beedle on 03:06 PM February 14th, 2005 EST (#5)
|
|
 |
 |
 |
Any bets as to which parent is the primary caregiver for the gunfighter children?
Is it child abuse to convince your son to kill his father?
|
|
 |
 |
|
 |
|
 |
 |
by Luek on 05:13 PM February 15th, 2005 EST (#6)
|
|
 |
 |
 |
Could our misandrous society be conditioning young people to view any incidence of domestic violence worthy of the ultimate penalty: Death?
A case of murder just decided in South Carolina where a 12 year old boy killed his grandparents seems to parallel this case.
The just convicted murderer, Christopher Pittman confessed to police that he killed his grandparents, Joe and Joy Pittman who evidently who had custody of him, because Joe Pittman paddled him. He rationalized killing his grandmother Joy Pittman because she did nothing to stop it.
See:
http://courttv.com/trials/pittman/021505_verdict_c tv.html
So are young people and young males in particular being conditioned to interpret any violent act in the family such as child discipline something that has to be answered with equal and even deadly force?
This might be the ultimate result of the zero tolerance and aggressive response the spirit of the VAWAct has fostered.
|
|
 |
 |
|
[an error occurred while processing this directive]