[an error occurred while processing this directive]
Washington Post Launches Pro-VAWA Campaign - Monday
posted by Matt on 07:08 PM December 20th, 2004
The Media Following on its opening story of yesterday, the Washington Post continues promulgating half-truths and half-picture reporting on DV in an effort to support re-funding VAWA. Click "Read more..." for the details.

The Washington Post: Where "Rape Hysteria" Takes a New Turn

NEWS FLASH

On Monday December 20, the Washington Post featured a 3-page article titled Violence Intersects Lives of Promise. This story, written by Donna St. George, is a follow-up to a similar piece that ran on December 19.

The purpose of the second article is to provide heart-rending descriptions of several pregnant women killed as a result of domestic violence.

BACKGROUND

Beginning in the 1920s, newspapers in the Southern United States began to run stories of black men who had allegedly raped white women. The sensationalistic articles played on readers' emotions in such a way that the public at large became unduly fearful.

The inflammatory news coverage had two effects:

1. Thousands of men, mostly black, were lynched by vigilante mobs.
2. Laws were passed that made it easier to convict alleged rapists.

In the early 1990s, rape hysteria descended on America’s college campuses, this time under the guise of stopping "date rape". As a result, colleges instituted new disciplinary procedures that, in many cases, removed the presumption of innocence from accused male students.

Now in 2004, a new type of rape hysteria is on the rise. That hysteria is being promoted by the domestic violence (DV) industry and by certain media outlets.

WHAT THE WASHINGTON POST ARTICLE SAYS

The Washington Post article provides graphic details, based on interviews with family members of two DV victims -- Shameka Fludd and Ceeatta McKinnie - and summaries of the deaths of several other women. The essay includes 7 photographs of victims and their family members.

A sidebar article, "States Add Penalties for Death of Unborn" discusses the effects of the Laci Peterson death on homicide laws around the country.

WHERE THE ARTICLE GOES WRONG

The WP article is anecdotal in nature. It is written to play on the emotions. It does not provide any real news beyond what was reported in the previous story. It is the kind of story one would expect to see on the Oprah Winfrey or Jerry Springer shows.

The concluding paragraph of the account reveals the legal outcome of one of the woman's murderers, Donte Allen, who was sentenced to 45 years in prison. After the sentence was announced, the father of the woman was quoted to say, "It’s not enough."

Translation: We need stronger laws to prevent domestic violence.

CONCLUSION

Each year, 207 mothers (some pregnant, others not) and 507 men die as a result of domestic violence. Their tragic deaths are never pleasant to recount. A three-page account of the slayings of the 507 men would have had a similar emotional impact.

Those men who have been victimized by domestic violence should no longer be ignored. Nor should the tragic deaths of 200 women be exploited by the domestic violence industry to sway public opinion about upcoming federal legislation.

The Washington Post is engaged in a biased - some would say scurrilous -- effort to impose a one-sided perspective on a problem that affects men and women alike.

TELL THE WASHINGTON POST TO HALT THE DV HYSTERIA

Please contact:

1. Letters to the Editor: letters@washpost.com
The Washington Post
1150 15th Street, NW
Washington, D.C. 20071

(Include your name, address, and daytime telephone number)

2. Donna St. George
E-mail: stgeorgedr@washpost.com

3. Washington Post Ombudsman:
Michael Getler
E-mail: ombudsman@washpost.com
Telephone: 202-334-7582

DLJ Launches anti-VAWA Campaign | Wesley Snipes sues NYC over DNA order  >

  
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
truly vile "reporting" (Score:0)
by Anonymous User on 07:40 PM December 20th, 2004 EST (#1)
Even worse than the tabloids. Nice timing too, right before Christmas. Merry Christmas to all the hate-mongers at the Post!
Re:truly vile "reporting" - Caroling with Ray (Score:0)
by Anonymous User on 02:28 AM December 21st, 2004 EST (#2)
"Merry Christmas to all the hate-mongers at the Post!"

Maybe the Washington Post could join in caroling these old time domestic violence industry holiday songs.

Have yourself a scary little Christmas. Make each day a fright. From now on your paranoia will be out of sight, and have yourself a scary little false police report.
================================================== ========================
domestic violence, domestic violence, jingles all the way. Oh what fun it is to scam in a story made of lies.

domestic violence, domestic violence, jingles all the way - to the bank.
================================================== =======================
I'm dreaming of a fright Christmas with every domestic violence industry lie I write. May your days be scary and a frieght, and may your husband get arrested on Christman night.

================================================== =======================

Adolph the red nosed feminist had a very pointed nose, and every time she spoke words you could even see it grow.

Then one foggy Christmas eve the newspapers came to say, "Adolph with your nose so long won't you give us a headline wrong." Then all the other feminazis, you could hear them shout and sing, "Adolph the long nosed feminazi, you'll go down in infamy."

================================================== ======================

and my all time favorite:

Frosty the snow job was a fairy tale they say. She was made of lies so the honest say, but she came to life one day.

There must have been some money in those VAWA lies she found, for when she posted in the news she began to dance around.

chorus:

The d.v. lies were alive as they could be and the feminazis say they could scam and play just by fleecing you and me.

================================================== =====================

Well, time to go so let's end this with that all time favorite carol of the feminist run domestic violence industry.

Silver coins, silver coins, it's fleecing time for the citizens. Jing a ling, hear them ring soon we will fund VAWA again.

  - Damn I hope not!

Ray

Re:truly vile "reporting" - Caroling with Ray (Score:1)
by Tom on 08:33 AM December 21st, 2004 EST (#3)
http://www.standyourground.com
Ray those are hilarious! Thanks.

Merry Christmas and a happy new fear.

Tom


Do we have True Equality?
re: W.P. article *** important comment here!! *** (Score:1)
by quetzal on 01:03 PM December 21st, 2004 EST (#5)
Hi, I am really glad I saw this post today!!! Less than one hour ago I mailed a letter to the editor of the Tampa Tribune (I live in Tampa). The letter concerned an article by the same perpetrator of half-truths, Ms. St. George. Her article appeared in the Tribune Sunday, and was going under a different headline than the Post article you mention. The article is very similar, about 70% anecdotal as you mention.
In my letter to the editor, I give more complete versions of some of the statistics she mentions, notably from the study done by Cheng.
Please all members of this site, go to the "Women's Rural Advocacy Programs" web page, to the article entitled 'Intimate Partner Homicide and Pregnancy'. There you will view the rest of the story, and learn how St. George was very selective in the statistics she used in her article!!
--quetzal
Slate calls them on bias (Score:1)
by The_Beedle on 10:01 AM December 21st, 2004 EST (#4)
http://slate.msn.com/id/2111254/

My friend Chuck Shepherd calls such imprecise terms and phrases as "many," "some," and "he's not alone," journalistic crutches. Reporters rely on them not so much out of abstract laziness as to help them maintain their story bias, he says.

All blown out of proportion. I'd still like to know how much more frequent death-by-violence is for pregnant mothers than the rest of the female population.
Letter to Washington Post (Score:0)
by Anonymous User on 01:57 PM December 21st, 2004 EST (#6)
Dear Washington Post Editor (letters@washpost.com):

Your article on domestic violence ignores the overwhelming data showing that women initiate domestic violence at rates comparable to men. ("Violence Intersects Lives of Promise, December 19, 2004).

A recent study funded by the U.S. Department of Justice found that "approximately 1.5 million women and 834,732 men are raped and/or physically assaulted by an intimate partner annually in the United States." http://www.ncjrs.org/txtfiles1/nij/181867.txt That makes men 36% of the victims. And virtually all surveys by universities and mental health professionals find that women initiate domestic violence as often as men do, and that men make 38% of injured victims, as this University bibliography illustrates. http://www.csulb.edu/%7Emfiebert/assault.htm

Downplaying female violence just to promote a feminist agenda only misleads the public about this important social issue and, in fact, fosters even more violence. When male victims don't seek help, the problem often escalates until someone gets hurt. Even minor violence is damaging when children witness it.

Please provide more honest and accurate coverage of this issue. We cannot end the intergeneration cycle of domestic violence unless we address all of it.

Marc E. Angelucci, Esq.
President
National Coalition of Free Men, Los Angeles chapter
www.ncfmla.org
(address & phone # omitted for posting)

For future reference, I suggest you read this law review article by Professor Lisa Kelly of Indiana State University School of Law, titled "Disabusing the Definition of Domestic Abuse; How Women Batter Men and the Role of the Feminist State." http://www.law.fsu.edu/journals/lawreview/download s/304/kelly.pdf
 
cc:

Washington Post Ombudsman
ombudsman@washpost.com

Donna St. George
stgeorgedr@washpost.com

 
Re:Letter to Washington Post (Score:0)
by Anonymous User on 09:53 PM December 21st, 2004 EST (#7)
I've read about half of the artcile on "Disabusing the Definition of Domestic Abuse; How Women Batter Men and the Role of the Feminist State." and so far I find it's worth reading in case anyone is thinking about doing so.

Even though I'm not done with it I just had this thought, possibly the article says this further on. But what silencing anything proving females can be just as violent as men and what ignoring female violence on me (thus not helping the men) shows is that women as gender do in fact, have considerable power.

But generally the power men have is more on an individual level. What I mean by that is that men's power, or "patriarchy" if you will, lies in the individual male being in an official position of power like a ceo or a president or boss or what have you. This is just a small minority of men, whereas it looks to me that women seem to have power spread out to all women in general.

They get less time for the same crimes, they can send a man to jail on their word alone, somehow even though feminsts say women are in poverty compared to men it's mainly men living on the streets, and their violence to children and men is not just ignored but in some ways is acceptable where it wouldn't be for men. They have all this without doing anything, just being female. They don't have to climb the latter or became famous or rich to have these privileges, they just have them. And I believe that is part of our "matriarchy" spread out to each women in general. As oppossed to how feminsts point out "male privilege" by looking at only the minority of men at the top and calling that "male privilege", when it isn't granted to all men like their "matriarchy" seems to be for women. At least that's how I'm starting to see it.

p. george
[an error occurred while processing this directive]