[an error occurred while processing this directive]
Double standards - incessant
posted by Adam on 04:48 PM October 21st, 2004
Inequality robrob writes "A female prison officer has successfully argued that it is sexual discrimination against her that she has to strip-search male inmates. Of course, female inmates enjoy the privilege of only being strip searched by female officers. She, the employment tribunal and the BBC seem oblivious to the double standard. Men can be strip-searched by men or women, women can be strip-searched by women only. The female officers that strip-search the men are discriminated against. Mind boggling......read it here."

Russian Army Crippled by Bullying | All pregnant women to asked: "Does your husband beat you?"  >

  
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Took the job, then acted "sickened" (Score:1)
by LSBeene on 08:11 PM October 21st, 2004 EST (#1)
(User #1387 Info)
She TOOK the job and THEN she was sickened. So, she wants the paycheck, but not the parts of the job she doesn't deign to do.

Male guards are not permitted to search female inmates because the INMATES don't like it. Female guards don't have to search male convicts because the GUARDS don't like it.

So, whatever the female wants, whether she be prisoner or guard, is the rule.

Nah ... THATS not an aristocracy.

Poor wittle oppressed soul...

Steven
Guerilla Gender Warfare is just Hate Speech in polite text
Re:Took the job, then acted "sickened" (Score:1)
by thea on 10:59 PM October 21st, 2004 EST (#2)
(User #1862 Info)
"Poor wittle oppressed soul..."

Yes, these poor, poor women. They're actually expected to *EARN* their paychecks. Why that's just not fair!

Oh god, why don't we just exile these lazy ass girls to Siberia. They're making the rest of my gender look bad. As if my gender can't look more spoiled.


*Ms.Thea the Pre-Law Major, Pro-Gender Egalitarian, and Pro-Reproductive Rights Activist*
This is kind of irrelavent but uh...... (Score:1)
by thea on 12:55 AM October 22nd, 2004 EST (#3)
(User #1862 Info)
I was doing my usual spying on feminist message boards, and I think there's no need to worry about any visible Feminist Dictatrix and her little Feminazi Reich coming along.

Why, well all they do is what typical women do; the bitch and "cat-fight" each other over insignificant nonsense that is completely irrelavent to any discussion.

Like any forum, an article is put up, they START saying things relavent to that article, but by the third comment, they're slashing each other's throats. IT'S SO FUNNY AS HELL!!!!

I was so amused to see these harden Feminists cut each other up over the littlest things. It was like watching six-year old girls fight over nothing. Because they did fight over NOTHING relavent to the articles or even feminism.

It was typical trivial feminine things that I have thankfully avoided by avoiding most companies of other females.

It was hilarious guys! But that doesn't mean that Big Sister is any less dangerous, and we do live in a virtual Feminist Dictatorship, so we should always continue fighting the Great Bitch. Don't get complacent now!

That's why I just love you guys and Men's Forums. And I just love the rationality and logic of your sex. You guys are rational, you stay on topic, you don't make childish personal attacks, you're constructive in your arguments and back up your opinions with factual information, you're mature, you don't whimper and whine like children when somebody disagrees with you, and you act like thinking adults.

And people wonder why I prefer the company of Men over females. So what if I have XX chromosomes. I want to hear rational arguments, not childish name calling, and immature belligerent bickering.

I'm glad I found you guys. No childish bullshit here. I love you guys :-)

And if feminists keep fighting each other like little girls, then perhaps we won't have to do it ourselves, because they'll be kind enough to destroy themselves.

But don't get complacent and don't let your guard down! Big Sister is watching and plotting against us behind the scenes.
*Ms.Thea the Pre-Law Major, Pro-Gender Egalitarian, and Pro-Reproductive Rights Activist*
Re:This is kind of irrelavent but uh...... (Score:0)
by Anonymous User on 01:15 PM October 22nd, 2004 EST (#6)
thea:
      interesting you should bring this up about the girls fighting amoung themselves over irrelevant and trivial issues. I have mentiond before I have made posts at an all female forum. there two moderators began to do the cat fight as you put it over something completly irrelevant. Furthrmore as I found out the hard way you never disagree with the one or take a different view point as she just cannot handle any dissention.
      I personally have no fear of anyone or any feminist or their organizations. It has alway been my policy to distance myself and my operation from anything that can have an adverse affect on my best interests. This in many cases is easier said than done but I would encourage anyone male of female to adopt the same philosophy.

              Pete in Nebraska
Re:This is kind of irrelavent but uh...... (Score:0)
by Anonymous User on 01:29 PM October 22nd, 2004 EST (#7)
Hi, Thea. Where did you find these message boards? I have looked for feminist boards in the past with no success, and it would be great to see how they deal with logical arguments on their forum. Would they consider an example of logic on their site an encroachment of patriarchy into their clubhouse?
      By the way, I think the difference in logic between males and females (not feminists) is vastly exaggerated. I certainly hope so, or being a sane man when I get married will be difficult.
Re:This is kind of irrelavent but uh...... (Score:1)
by Ragtime on 07:00 PM October 22nd, 2004 EST (#8)
(User #288 Info)
"being a sane man when I get married will be difficult."

Actually, it'll be impossible. NO sane man would get married in our current legal and social climate.

Just say NO.

Don't do it. Do NOT get married.

Ragtime.

The Uppity Wallet

The opinions expressed above are my own, but you're welcome to adopt them.

What about he rights of the inmates? (Score:1)
by Bert on 07:26 AM October 22nd, 2004 EST (#4)
(User #1895 Info) http://www.geocities.com/anti_feminisme/index.html
The point in this case is, she is concerned about HER rights and not about the inmate's rights. I am wondering how the pannel's verdict would have been if the inmate's had complained about being stripsearched by females.

This one complained, but I am quite sure that there are a lot of those bitches who are very pleased having the power to humiliate men.

Bert
-------------------- Fighting for men's rights is fighting for children's and women's right's as well.
Re:What about he rights of the inmates? (Score:1)
by westcoast2 on 07:34 AM October 22nd, 2004 EST (#5)
(User #1409 Info)
Off course this now means men can search men only and women search women only? (prolly not women will be given a choice)

Though, now we have another potential discrimination case.

First in this case a woman is discriminated against because she must search male inmates.

Second another woman will claim discrimination that she is discriminated against because she can't .

west...just a thought
[an error occurred while processing this directive]