|
This discussion has been archived.
No new comments can be posted.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
"The issue is not that there are more violent women now, but that women are feeling more comfortable with being violent."
Well no shit Sherlock. If you pamper, spoil, coddle, privilege, and indulge a group of people (ie: the Female Sex) they'll do whatever the hell they want because there's NO consequences!
My Criminal Justice Professor (by the way she's NOT a feminist. She's a cool prof who actually addressed the issue of increasing female violence and male victims of domestic abuse in a very serious and sympathetic manner, and was for punishing female criminals just as equally as men) told us during a lecture that women according to most studies have ALWAYS been as equally--if not more so--as violent as men because they hide it using their traditional roles as the saintly housewife and nurturing mothers, and they used male chivalry to get away with it.
Remember the movie 'Chicago' with Richard Gear, Catherine Zeta-Jones, Queen Latifah, it's a perfect example of women in the past during the age of REAL Patriarchy using male chivalry to get away with crimes and violence.
She actually told us this and believes it! She hasn't been corrupted (or censored) by the Feminists who own the college campuses! And she blasted the feminists who always claim abuse to downplay the damage caused by female violence.
Female Violence? Nothing new. It's always been there. We're just now recognizing because it "shocks" us. Poor women. They've been corrupted and abused by men and now they're becoming just as evil as men. Boo-hoo!
Well I guess my gender is no longer the morally superior sex (not that we were to begin with). How about you guys take the lead for a few years and teach us ladies how to be morally superior?
And men are not as determined to fight for their families and societies?! What typical Maternalist-Feminist bullshit!! Explain all the Men who die in wars to protect their wives and children! And explain why we don't see women rushing to register for the draft. More determined my ass! It seems like they're only more determined when it's convenient for them or there's money and fame in the deal!
I found the article to be the following: A breath of fresh air. A 'no shit you just realize that' moment. And an article with a few disappointing Maternalist-Feminist propaganda tid-bits thrown in to probably please the Feminist PC thugs. Journalism; isn't it grand?
*Ms.Thea the Pre-Law Major, Pro-Gender Egalitarian, and Pro-Reproductive Rights Activist*
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
I hope you're a look at the future, babe!
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
"I hope you're a look at the future, babe!"--TLE
Yes. Me too. Well said, Ms Thea.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ladies like Ms Thea are the reason I will always love women, no feminazi in this world can change that. And it is because of these good ladies, feminism will go down one day, I'm quite sure about that.
Let's cherish them gentlemen.
Bert
--------------------
Fighting for men's rights is fighting for children's and women's right's as well.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
It's interesting that it takes tabloid coverage of female suicide bombers and serial killers to get just a little exposure of the long legacy and continuing reality of feminine aggression.
While Muslim women blowing themselves up poses new questions for the academics to debate, the more typical and pervasive illustrations of female violence are seldom exposed and remain under the social radar...
Women seldom have to resort to direct violence because they are expert at "indirect aggression" in all it's many insidious forms.
As adolescent girls, they learn to use the full arsenal of psychological, emotional, and Third Party aggression, such as destroying reputations, making false accusations, rumor-mongering, shunning and ostracizing enemies, giving and/or withholding affection/friendship as a weapon, getting others ("The State") to do your dirty work, feigning innocence; not to mention the routine use of sexuality-as-power and as a tool to coerce, manipulate, and control.
The current climate of anti-male tyranny in the court system can only be explained by recognizing feminism's brilliant subversion of the principles of "justice" to advantage their gender and subjugate men as legal chattel.
It amounts to state-sanctioned third-party violence against men as a class... and can be linked directly to female pathology and their species' expertise as superb indirect aggressors.
Since October is "Domestic Violence Awareness Month," it's fitting that we should celebrate women's equality in committing violence ... child abuse, senior abuse, infanticide, intimate partner abuse...
In all these deviant contests, women truly excel.
"You GO girls!"
"It's a terrible thing ... living in fear."
- Roy: hunted replicant, Blade Runner
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Women seldom have to resort to direct violence because they are expert at "indirect aggression" in all it's many insidious forms.
As adolescent girls, they learn to use the full arsenal of psychological, emotional, and Third Party aggression, such as destroying reputations, making false accusations, rumor-mongering, shunning and ostracizing enemies, giving and/or withholding affection/friendship as a weapon, getting others ("The State") to do your dirty work, feigning innocence; not to mention the routine use of sexuality-as-power and as a tool to coerce, manipulate, and control.
I totally agree, we need to bring this stuff to light. It has been going on since humans could speak, and the major religions all have things to say about malicious gossip, but feminists have fooled us into thinking that 'gossip' is a sexist cultural construct designed to denigrate women. However, this excellent article by Kent Bailey has something to say about the evolutionary origins of it:
the gathering female rarely- if ever- competed against males, but she competed vigorously against other females for the best males, the best provisions, and status within the group. In this competition, the tongue was the weapon used to gather support to one's side, to denigrate, peripheralize, and demoralize the opposing side, and, in general, control one's destiny...
In humans and chimpanzees...it is the female who must leave the safe home environment and then integrate herself into the "groom's" often strange and threatening family and tribal configuration.
I suggest that this phenomenon goes to the very heart of female psychology... Upon entering a new, strange, and possibly dangerous new social environment, the female gave up her old culture for a new one and her survival was predicated upon doing so quickly and skillfully. Under duress, she was required to give up her family culture partially or completely, and to essentially "become one of them." We see that the Stockholm syndrome, cultural relativism, and "going with the cultural flow" have ancient roots indeed on the distaff side...
In the world of fem-think, one ...relies upon the three "A's" of survival in a strange camp- appeasement, adjustment, and adaptation.
It makes sense to think that women who were very skilled at manipulation were more successful than those who were not. This does not justify it however. Violent men were more successful than non-violent ones, but that is not a reason to be violent now.
Don't get mad. Get organised.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The most interseting thing in this read for me was the quote from Kipling. Radfems tried to have a lot of his poetry and writings purged from libraries. He also said:
"If you're wounded and left on Afganistan's plains
And the women crawl out to carve up what remains
Just roll to your rifle and blow out your brains
And go to your God like a soldier "
|
|
|
|
|
[an error occurred while processing this directive]
|
