|
This discussion has been archived.
No new comments can be posted.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For those governing men's interactions with women, the laws are absolutely draconic. Raising your voice in anger is enough to get a restraining order legally forbidding you to see your children. The laws which govern women's interactions with men, or even little boys, or even HANDICAPPED little boys, are so permissive as to allow women to just about get away with raping a blind 11 year old completely. Of course, if she gets pregnant from it, he will have to pay support thanks to the draconian laws governing him.
Notice also that these same principals apply to the way we socialize. A man saying something that could be interpretted as less than worshipful of all women everywhere will always be punished and to the full extent possible, (by shunning, insulting, verbally wishing extreme violence against the speaker, and sometimes actually attacked), regardless of mitigating circumstances. Of course, the speaker's "crime" will immediately be shared among all the women he might interact with so they too can participate in punishing the speaker. If years later, Anita Hill decides to sue you for using unapproved speach, all the others will join in with the list of things they remember you saying as well, doing their duty to help keep other women from being victimized by men speaking in a free, uncontrolled fashion. Meanwhile women are free to be as rude and disrespectful to men as they wish, as it's currently fashionable to be, (women who are assholes to men are idolized by others as "strong, strong women". Women who are nice to men are viewed as victims and weak), without fear of any but the most minimal social repercussions in only the most extreme cases. Sort of like the minimal legal repercussions given to the woman in this article for her most extreme crime.
Could the need for a men's movement be any more clear?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
This is an outrage. For downloading wanking material from the net, men have been sentanced to years in prison, yet, when a woman actually Rapes a young boy - she does not srve the minimum 5 years per count the state prescribes !
Surely, this can be taken to a higher court and an example made, after all, she was also employed in a position of Trust ?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
>>>Could the need for a men's movement be any more clear?
Definitely. I am just glad that others are seeing this 'unequal' view of the two genders.It's difficult to live in a community where "evil" means males and "innocent" means female and there is NO dicussion.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
"Tuifel... will have to register as a sex offender..."
Well, on the positive side, she'll be on Megan's list, which is a rarity for a female rapist.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nobody is going to be making 'hot for teacher' jokes about this one, as she has the appearance of a heroin junkie.
Mary Kay Letournau started out with a three month sentence and probation, this woman is getting six months and probation. Is the difference too small to count as a change, or is the sentencing of women creeping up? Anyone know what men currently get for the same convictions?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
If a middle-aged male tutor had repeatedly raped a blind 11-year old girl in his care, he'd probably be facing life.
Feminism=Fascism : Get Wise to the Lies
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
by Anonymous User on 02:57 PM August 13th, 2004 EST (#5)
|
|
|
|
|
"Is the difference too small to count as a change, or is the sentencing of women creeping up? "
Well,Mary Kay`s victim was a 12 year old.This boy was 11 AND blind,so I don`t think there is any creeping up going on.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mary Kay LeTourneau got the SAME sentence (or there abouts).
Oh, and SHE was cheating on her spouse. Any Op-eds suggesting she be RUN OVER BY A CAR!?
It was like 6 months, a big block of PROBATION, and ordered not to see her (then) 13 year old lover (she was already pregnant I believe).
What happened?
She was caught with him in a car, windows all steamed up, and she was pregnant AGAIN.
Here is a quote from TIME magazine that I just got today:
"I wanted to see ... who she is and if she's still the same person that I fell in love with. And I want to see if she feels the same way for me."
---Vili Fualaau, on why he wants to see Mary Kay LeTourneau, his sixth grade teacher, who served seven years in prison for having a sexual relationship with him; it resulted in two children
Now, did you notice what I noticed?!
THEY NAMED HIM - the sexual assault survivor was named (and has been for quite some time Doesn't matter if he's over 18 (when he was originally named I read his name YEARS ago!). He's a sexual assault/molestation survivor.
Oh and did you notice the OTHER thing I noticed?
After a girl gets raped/molested she gets TONS of support (read:indoctrination). She is filled with hate and loathing at the person who betrayed her (and justly so, but I wish they would let her heal and move on....). She has constant reinforcement of her "victimhood" and when she doesn't there is ALWAYS ALWAYS some "advocate" to explain how predators use manipulation on the victim. ALWAYS.
And MKL was writing to her victim from jail, in DIRECT VIOLATION of her sentence. And she is now free. The press reports the letters, it's common knowledge, and she just walks free. This is proof positive that there is a double standard in molestation cases:
BOY DON'T MATTER, and let the predator continue contact.
Barf!!
Steven
Guerilla Gender Warfare is just Hate Speech in polite text
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
"she couldn't bear" to go to jail for 5-25 years????-- What kind of excuse is that for a pedophile? I can't believe this crap. Oh Boo hoo, we should all feel sorry for a woman when she commits a crime, but a man is just plain guilty if he does.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
by Anonymous User on 09:57 PM August 13th, 2004 EST (#9)
|
|
|
|
|
yeah, I know...but everyone else can handle the time just dandy.....if a man said such a thing we'd all laugh...wtf...
p. geroge
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
in connecticut,the mayor of waterbury,phil giordano got 35 years for having sex with an 11 year old girl.i wonder if he had been her teacher would it have been all right
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
by Anonymous User on 11:32 AM August 15th, 2004 EST (#14)
|
|
|
|
|
No, it wouldn't be alright. He's a MAN.
But had he been a woman...,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
by Anonymous User on 01:18 AM August 14th, 2004 EST (#11)
|
|
|
|
|
Honestly, I think Mensactivism.org is a better news source than the mainstream media.
Amperro
Paranoia Is A Virtue
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
by Anonymous User on 12:50 PM August 14th, 2004 EST (#12)
|
|
|
|
|
Would it have been better to have the victim testify, though that would have been a difficult experience?
It is said that the woman could have gotten a 5 to 25 year sentence on each of the three counts. Of course, theory can be very different from reality...
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
"Would it have been better to have the victim testify, though that would have been a difficult experience?"
It might have helped save other boys from becoming victims of this woman.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Here is an example of how male molesters are treated in the courts and br>newspapers:
//www.nydailynews.com/08-17-2004/news/crime_file/s tory/222675p-191327c.html
(I forgot how to use html tags. Help please.)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The news paper/site was for stories in general and this one must have "fallen off" as new ones came on.
I could not find the one you spoke of.
Steven
Guerilla Gender Warfare is just Hate Speech in polite text
|
|
|
|
|
[an error occurred while processing this directive]
|
