|
This discussion has been archived.
No new comments can be posted.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
en masse criminalization of male sexuality.
Honestly, why the fuck would anyone actually have sex with an American woman today? Why subject your very life to the whim of a woman and her own little totalitarian regime hell-bent on destroying you? Why offer yourself up as a cash cow, a resource, a feminist prize? Everytime a man commits suicide, or is disposed of in prison, these sadistic, bloodthirsty bastards consider it another small victory.
There is one reason why the analogy between feminism and nazism is not quite accurate: the nazis didn't subject their own goddamn children to their tactics of ruthless dehumanization.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
I read the linked article and all I can say is what a damm waste. He was only a kid and as far as I am concerned he did nothing wrong. If I were his parents the state of Michigan would be looking at one hell of lawsuit.
On another note I had the opportunity to do some reading on feminist doctrine. This material was posted by younger women 20-35 age range. As I read my reactions were likened to being sprayed by a high pressure fire hose in the face with cold water. I cannot believe what hysterical fanatics these women are. They blame men for every damm thing that is wrong. One would think that they would have more important things on their minds then to fretting over all that bullshit.
Women scare the hell out of me. I own a lovely home in the nicest part of town. It is paid for and I also own a successful business and am financially secure. My health and fitness is excellent and I have no baggage from any previous relationships. Only baggage I may have is a large and mean dog that does not like anyone. This is a perfect situation for some lady to step into. Then I think of date rape, spousal rape (how assinine) and how women can even have men arrested for verbal abuse. I could go on but I am sure most of you know where I am coming from. Several of my friends are in the same situation, they have nice homes and a business. We are all single guys. One in Colorado says he will not even bring a women in his house that he is dating. They go to dinner and when the evening is over he escorts her to her car which is parked on his property and sees her off. He told me"I do not even bring them in the house".
Well good for the feminists and perhaps in another 10 years this society will be more disarranged than it is today.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
I'm 19, perhaps I'm still too young to fully understand the great feminist doctrines. :P All that illogic babbling makes my brain implode.
I think the parents are rallying against Megan's Law, at least how it was applied in his case, ie, any sex offender = tell the world about.
Why even have them park on his property? Why not just, oh, both meet at the resturant? Just curious.
It amazes me that a woman is portrayed as being 'strong enough' to have a man arrested for 'verbal spousal abuse' but not 'strong enough' to simply leave the relationship. Unfortunately what happens is she starts seeking a divorce and comes into a feminist-run 'domestic violence awareness group' and boom, she's a poor victim, had nowhere else to turn to. Blah.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Crescentluna,
I would just like to say that my rather generalized statements of American women were in no way meant to imply that women are evil or whatever. I suppose I can get a little harsh when I see things like this. Just for clarification, my point was that current DV and sexual crimes legislation resembles nothing short of a bloodthirsty meatgrinder run amok. And men would be wise to think long and hard about whether the "benefits" of sexual encounters in such a hostile climate outweigh the risks.
Its really good to see your posts, because you remind me again and again that there are still good-hearted women out there, and that feminism and women are two very different things. Thanks.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Oh, no offense taken, it's not your experiences/perceptions that make me angry, it's the feminist "all men R evil" climate that creates a fertile ground for those experiences to occur that makes me angry.
Anyway, you're welcome. :)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For all the reasons cited above and more, it's becoming abundantly clear that more and more successful, intelligent, marriage-able men are pulling a Nancy Reagan on the female species and "Just Saying NO!"
It takes all of five minutes, a pencil, and a legal pad with columns labeled "Advantages of Marriage" vs. "Disadvantages of Marriage" for any man to conclude that the coochie ain't worth the risks...
"It's a terrible thing ... living in fear."
- Roy: hunted replicant, Blade Runner
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
by Anonymous User on 08:40 PM May 11th, 2004 EST (#20)
|
|
|
|
|
As I have said before, many times; I absolutely will NOT have a sexual realationship with any woman, at this time. (includeing marriage)
I have a FEW female friends but that is all they are is FRIENDS. and I am wary even of that.
Yes, I too know that there are, indeed very good women out there. But as I've asked before; HOW DO YOU TELL WHICH IS WHICH!?!? Generaly speaking you CAN'T. It's VERY much like playing 'Russian roulette...'
Thundercloud.
"Hoka hey!"
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Heheh, I didn't think many still married for convenience. ;) Anyway, understandable. Weirdly enough the boyfriend has a horde of female friends, mostly lesbians. I think he's a feminist - I'm a little worried.
Is it nomarriage.com that has the rants and articles? If so, I remember a friend of mine being all astounded-by-the-logic awhile ago. heh.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
by Anonymous User on 01:12 PM May 12th, 2004 EST (#23)
|
|
|
|
|
C'mon, guys. We're not ALL bad.
Jinx
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
by Anonymous User on 01:26 PM May 12th, 2004 EST (#26)
|
|
|
|
|
We know that, Jinx.
All I was saying is you can't tell the women that will love and cherish you from the ones who will torture and sue you by superficial means.
Thundercloud.
"Hoka hey!"
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Jinx
I have to second Thundercloud's response. I adore women but they have me and most of my male friends running scared. I would love to have the right one in my life and she would find no one better but I just cannot take the chance of loosing it all. It's not a good situation and I think everyone looses here.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
women... have me and most of my male friends running scared.
Yet another guy at the rec center, where I work out, brought this up to me a couple days ago. I don't want to reveal much about him, so I'll just say that he has a good job in a high-tech field. He said that a few of the guys that he works with recently got married, and in no case was it to an American woman. When he said "American woman," he shuddered. Then he said that some of the other guys have had sperm frozen and gotten vasectomies, so they have greater control over not becoming fathers. At that point he got an expression that was part disgusted, part baffled, and part weary. After a moment of silence he said, "Instant third class citizenship."
The fact is, the laws are stacked against men, and women know it. Women can make monstrous, life-destroying, false accusations against men with almost complete assurance of impunity. And men are realizing this and taking precautions.
This is due entirely to the twisted alliance of feminism and chivalry.
Thomas
-- Creating hostile environments for feminazis since the 1970s.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First of all, you CAN NOT GET MARRIED, becouse marriage does not exist, marriage is a contract in wich women are forced to obey and serve their husbands and them are forced to support and take care of them, is a contract that exist in most places of the world, it existed in the west not anymore.
So does not matter if you want to get married or not, YOU CAN´T, as simple as that, you can call an aple a car, you can say love when refering to torture, but an apple is not a car, and love is not torture.
What he have here is a contrac that allows one person to ensalve another, a cosntrac that allows to steal another his wage, his assets, force him to support children they did´nt that the are not his, etc,etc, all this for nothing, nothing at all, at least salve master had the obligation to feed, cloth and give them a roof to live to their slaves, they had to care them when they were sicks and when they were old.
Call it slavery contrast, or if you like call it feminazi marriage.
Just Take a look:
http://www.misandry.net/marriage.n.divorce/whydidi divorce.htm
In a muslim country, he would have repudiate this parasite, keep his children, his wage and with luck remarry a nice women to help him rise his children, same in Germany.
Marriage no marriage? nosense, if you want to get married go to a place where it exist.
PD: Besides the laws, in countries were marriage exist, women mindsets are completly different, they expect to be supported by men but they also are willing to do something in return, as their society exacts from them, and ofcourse they accept that men are the ones who decide when to have children, how many and have the final saying on their education, as they are the ones who are going to support them.
So even if marriage would be legalized again in the west, western women are rotten material for that purpose, marrying a women from a traditional country in a western country is risky, but not suicidal as to marry a local woman.
Wester females have been indoctrinated to hate men, they have been taught to do nothing for men and still feel entitled to profit from their labor, no even thanks, nothing, is their constitutional rigth. Traditional women even without the legal reinforment of their duties, will have much more respect for the men that support them, for the father os their children, thta has been engrained in their brain, they have recieved a completly different education.
But any ways marriage is an absurd anachronism in non traditional societies, it has only logic for female parasites that want to exploite men.
The divorce rate stands at just under 70 percent in the United States today -- a 70 percent failure rate for that vaunted institution of marriage. And it's logical to assume that any institution consistently failing half the time should be drastically reformed, if not junked altogether.
Of the ones that remain married, how many are really happy?, and how many are just trapped in it?.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
How many are really happy?
what timing for this post. Last evening a friend called from out of state. I have know him for years and years. He is on his third marrage and again advised me to stay single. His exact comment was "I was happier and felt more secure when I was single". Stated marriage was just to complicated. I realize these are the words of only one person but I have heard this from many.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
If some group is beeing exploited and want that explotation to come to an end, the first thing thay have to do is tell it.
Western marriage is a contract, (any marriage is just that, a contract), in wich men that signs it are allowing women to forced them to profit from their labor, allow women to take their savings, their homes, their retirment benefits, to support the children they decide to bring to the world, using their sperm or the sperm of the plumber, letterman or tenis instructor, all this in return for NOTHING, i repeat NOTHING, feminits marriage gives men no rights at all.
Western marriage, feminist marriage, or modern slavery crontract, (what ever you prefer), is a contract in wich men become exploited by women.
What should a man sign it?, signing it is voluntary, so men are voluntarly submiting to this sort of slavery, a man can marry to get nationality, or if he is poor and has a rich lover that fancys to get married, in those cases what the hell, why not?, but in general marriage is absurd.
Men complain about being exploited by women but they voluntarely sign those slavery contracts, absurd.
Love?, becouse a woman is in love with a man she is supposed to accept that he exploits her?, (ask a feminist), same for men, love has nothing to do with slavery or explotation much less if the one to be exploited is the one is supposed to be loved.
By not getting married, (except for profit), the message is clear, i do not expect any women to serve and obey me, (nosense becouse is that way alrready, wether one is married or not), but nether i accept that any women profit from my labor, live at my expense, steal my house, my savings or whatever.
The message is clear, no i do not accept that my role in live is beeing the slave of a woman, not voluntarely.
Well some would say that it can be done by force, using children as an excuse, (child support), yep true but much, much less:
1) Taxes are so high that there is not too much that they can steal from one average salary, with that ammount is just imposible to support to homes, so bummer western women go for benefits but as their number gets higher and higher western goverments force them to work.
2) Here in Europe we have what we call minimum supporting level, this is the minimum ammount of money one needs to survive, this ammount is not taxed, and can not be garnished, boooom!!, an other strike against male slavery, if i make 2000 € per month but the mimimum support level is 1000 € how much they can take from my salary without making me quit my job? let see, 30%?,
That would leave me with 1400 € per month, but if I quit working i will receive 1000 €,(income support), so in fact i am going to work for 400 € per month, who is going to do that?, not me, not you, not anyone, so the goverment wanted to save money by forcing me to support a female, and now has two people on social benefits, and one, (a productive member of the society), that was previously paying taxes and contributing to the social security system, and now is not, but still consumes health care services, income support, and so on.
So how much they can take from an average salary without making that guy quiting job?, 10% perhaps? might be this, or arround this, but no more than that, so goverment turn their heads on women and start demand them to work or else lose their children, (given to the father, or placed into adoption), and lose benefits too, ohhh!! bummer!!.
Here is happening, one can see a lot of women doing any kind of dirty jobs, trash collector, public gardener, and so on, huge campaigns to incentive women to work in traditional male areas, masons, truck drivers, whatever, otherwise there is going to be a problem, if women must not obey and serve men anymore, men are not going to support them either, just a matter of time, they know that, that is also changing women attitudes, they know they can count anymore on living parasitically at the expence of men labor, an option each passing day avalaible for less and less women.
3) Women has no legal duty to men, so long so good, neither must men have any towards women, if women want custody of their children they must be responsible to support them, however, as long as they do not work, the goverment will not force them to do it, and will try to force men instead, so lets make them work, by letting them knowing that they are not going to be supported, so they must work like men do, the alternative is looking for food on the trash containers.
4) As more and more people are not married, (divorced and never married), it would be obvious that we live in a soiciety with two different citizenships, first class, the ones that get paid to have children, has reproduction rights, and custody rights, and second class, with no reproduction rights at all, for wich having children just means a sentence to perform slave labor during 20 years or more. The more obvious, the more difficult to maintain.
There is an obvious correlation between men rights and responsabilities regarding children and the percentage of unmarried people in the wester world, the more unmarried people there are, the more rights and less responsabilities men have. The legal duties of women towards men are zero, nill, nada, in the whole west, however the duities of men towards women are lesser in countries with moere unmarried people, alimony has been otulaw in may countries, marital property rights too, (the right of a female to loot a man savings).
5) Saying no to feminist marriage is saying no to Slavery.
The more men remain unmarried the more marriage becomes just another option in the eyes of younger men, and knowing what marriage is, the less will get married.
As some of the this forum said : "It takes all of five minutes, a pencil, and a legal pad with columns labeled "Advantages of Marriage" vs. "Disadvantages of Marriage" for any man to conclude that the coochie ain't worth the risks..."
Citing Esther Vilar:
"If a young man gets married, starts a family, and spends the rest of his life working at a soul-destroying job, he is held up as an example of virtue and responsibility. The other type of man, living only for himself, working only for himself, doing first one thing and then another simply because he enjoys it and because he has to keep only himself, sleeping where and when he wants, and facing woman when he meets her, on equal terms and not as one of a million slaves, is rejected by society. The free, unshackled man has no place in its midst."
More light:
"The point is that women have EVERY incentive for divorce, including the criminization of a man based on words alone, wage garnishment, sole custody, separation of a man from his property and the governmental control of the family unit.
What gets me is that so many men are still marrying and having children, through their own volition. If a lot of men made a practice of putting their hands into fires and then yelled and bitched, when they got burnt, how much sympathy would most people have for them? It's no longer a mystery, what is going on. The facts are clear for anyone to see.
Yes, many men would love to have a stable, committed, balanced, and fair relationship with a woman. Many of these men would love to have children. But such a relationship with a woman isn't possible, because women have all the power in a relationship by law. And it isn't possible for a man to be a father under the law; it is only possible for a man to be, under threat of literally being locked in a cage and tortured (imprisoned), financially responsible for a woman's children. Many men are figuring it out. It's an imperfect world. A legally fair relationship with a woman isn't possible, and it isn't possible for a man to legally be a true father."
6) Do not relate To female parasites, there are good and bad women, same with men, but avoid getting related with golddigers or parasites that feel entitled to exploite male labor, thus exploite you, also avoid poor or lazy women.
Today's possibility is tomorrow's expectation.
"While men have often felt the need to be both physically attractive and economically successful to qualify as dating and marriage material, women have merely had to be attractive. (And feminists have complained about that one expectation!) That's all changed. For some time now, it has been possible for women to become as successful at work as men. Not only are men more and more receptive to female success, but now many expect it. A lot of single men are looking for women who are both attractive and successful because it's possible to find them. The possibility of female success has created the expectation of female success. Women are becoming increasingly saddled with the same double expectation many men have always felt saddled with. Perhaps that's why more women are smoking and drinking to relieve stress. Welcome, women, to "men's world" and gender equality!."
From a woman:
"Women need money, because they want to be able to live when they get divorced, something quite frequent in society. Women therefore become professionals and build careers, and must wait to marry until they are dangerously close to the infertility cliff.
The closer they get to the cliff, the more desperate and anxious they become. The more desperate the women are, the more they offer themselves to men. The men have all the sex they want, and know, too, that if they marry, there is a good chance that a divorce will come and blow everything away.
A feminist judge or one sympathetic to the children will jail a father if he does not pay monies that the father may not have. Judges are "helping" women by going after men with savagery. Women who deny the father visitation rights are to be found all over the country, but they don't get jailed. Men have their revenge by watching women age. Our country gets lovelier every day."
Now add that there is no even going to be marriage, so work is no longer an option for women is a duty now, like for men, only the sick and the elderly adults should be allowed to live without working, the days of the parasites are numbered.
Take care!!
PD: Nice your friend "got out of the closet" and said what his experience of feminist marriage is, instead of keeping silent and let another generations of males going to the slaughter house.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Read this:
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/main.jhtml?xml=/ne ws/2004/05/11/nwife11.xml&sSheet=/news/2004/05/11/ ixhome.html
The first link on Angry harry!!
Realated to marriage and parasitism
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
"I have a FEW female friends but that is all they are is FRIENDS. and I am wary even of that.
Yes, I too know that there are, indeed very good women out there. But as I've asked before; HOW DO YOU TELL WHICH IS WHICH!?!? Generaly speaking you CAN'T. It's VERY much like playing 'Russian roulette...' "
Here are a couple of things you can look for brother.
First check out her library shelf and magazine rack...if she advidly reads feminazi propaganda...she is a believer.
Second make note of who her friends are...if their is a man hater in the group, the man hater will insult you the very first time she meets you. Your girlfriend might not be as much of a manhater, but the friend will take on the role of coach when the relationship gets rocky.
Third...those who are unequivocally anti-feminist will say so...just like the sympathetic females who participate in this forum do.
Even in the best of times, it's sort of like going to a good rock concert...if you arrive late the best seats are taken.
By the way bro...one of the things I plan to do after I retire is a tour of North America visiting a different pow-wow every weekend...hope I can get to meet you face to face.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Male or female? If he's had sex with a 14 year old male he would have been in even more trouble in some states.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Because she lied and said she was 16, or whatever the age there is? Maybe she didn't even lie, maybe he honest to god never asked her age and thought she was older [didn't someone else on here have a story about a chick at a bar using a fake ID, rather supposed she was 21+ but she was actually 15?].
I've known girls that do that, a very similar thing happened to a friend of mine. sorry, I don't think we should require men or boys to run a background check on every female they come into contact with on the off chance they'll be charged with statuatory rape. AND, I don't think he should be placed in the same box with, say, a 35-year-old that has sex with a 14-year-old.
By the way, where have you been? All sodomy laws have been found unconstitutional - ie, same problems whether it is a male or female underager.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
by Anonymous User on 03:06 PM May 10th, 2004 EST (#13)
|
|
|
|
|
Having attended high school in the recent past, I can say that an awful lot of teenage girls can pass for older women. And some older women can pass for teenagers. Sometimes it's just a matter of the clothes they wear and the way they speak.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
by Anonymous User on 11:02 PM May 9th, 2004 EST (#2)
|
|
|
|
|
This story really gnaws at your gut. This young man is dead, because a promiscuous teenage female choose to have sex with 22 men who were thinking with their sex organ instead of their brain. She kept a diary of her victims. It must have been quite a power trip for the the young female. I suspect she looked older than her years.
Ray
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Did anyone see that? The girl was 15 and had sex with some insane number of guys so that she could write a book about it.
anyway.
I still think most statuatory rape laws are stupid, at least the rigidly upheld ones - or the one like Virginia's one over 18/one under = rape policy.
Geez, I knew a girl that was a highschool freshman dating a senior - most thought "oh god, he's much too old for you!" but no, she was held back two years and he was put forward one - she was 16 and he was 17.
I can think of so many scenarios to counteract the prevailing idea that all men are evil predators and women poor victims.
This case is just another example of trying to hold to that idiotic scenario without evidence, even when people end up dead over it. grrg.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
by Anonymous User on 01:17 PM May 12th, 2004 EST (#24)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First he broke the law, then he broke the conditions of his parole, then he OD's on drugs. This guy had some major problems. I'm wondering why he wasn't required to go into drug rehab and counseling.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
You know, Lorianne, I used to spend a little bit of energy defending you, but I gotta tell you sweetie, right now, I'd like to slap you. Your problem is that you can't (or won't) look beyond the end of your nose to examine the root cause of a problem. Yeah, yeah, yeah, taken as an isolated case, this kid was just born under a bad sign. But step back a take a look at all of the suicides of all of the men and boys who've been mistreated by sex-crime/ child-support/ domestic violence zealots. There's a uniform pattern emerging here, and if you haven't the capacity to see it, then you are either really lost in the ozone or deliberately disregarding it.
And I'm not even a conspiracy theorist.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
by Anonymous User on 07:46 PM May 11th, 2004 EST (#18)
|
|
|
|
|
"First he broke the law, then he broke the conditions of his parole, then he OD's on drugs. This guy had some major problems. I'm wondering why he wasn't required to go into drug rehab and counseling."
When the gender's are reversed, isn't this always the point where some gender feminist jumps into the conversation and says, "STOP blaming the victim!"?
There's No Excuse for Radical/Gender Feminist behavior that drives a young man to take his own life. Opps, there I go using gender feminist vernacular again. I keep forgetting that men are not entitled to receive equal treatment under the laws and policies of man-hating, gender feminist america.
...and that is most likely why this young man is dead. Live with it.
Sincerely, Ray
This T-shirt says domestic violence, but you could apply it to this issue as well. It's really hard to have a T-shirt protesting every man-hating law made by gender feminists.
(click) Gender Feminist Laws Are Corrupt - Accept That Responsibility
(Please do not scroll up the page of the linked item(s). All the info I am trying to convey is only as the page comes up initially.)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
by Anonymous User on 08:26 PM May 11th, 2004 EST (#19)
|
|
|
|
|
Given your reaction, you seem very messed up. You seem to have no emotional feeling for men and seem to be in denial about the injustices that men face. I would prescribe buying a bunch of Ray's t-shirts and wearing then continuously for a month. Hope that helps.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
It sounds like to me this guy needed some serious help whether or not he committed statuatory rape. Where was the help to get him off drugs and get him some counseling?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
I don't know Lorainne, why didn't he get help? Oh, yeah, because there are no programs for young men, there is no funding for young men, and there is never a good reason other than guilt a young man does anything. Get your head out of your ass. Of course he didn't get help. No one bothered to ask if he needed any help. I am sure his young 'victim' got lots of help.
Please.
the Biscuit Queen
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
I wanted to post a "reply" to this, but was too damn tired this weekend.
This kind of crap annoys the hell out of me.
First off there is this:
Quote
his name would appear for 25 years on the state's sex offender registry, despite a plea agreement that allowed him to avoid inclusion on the list.
So the ADA made a deal and then this deal is set aside later. What REALLY pisses me off is how guys like Will Heatherington has proven that he couldn't have raped his wife are kept in jail on a technicality and how the states says it's "powerless" to let him (and others) out due to the law ... and then we see how that's just not true.
Let's see what our little victim did for sport:
Quote
"In three spiral notebooks, the girl chronicled sexual encounters with 22 boys and men."
Now, I don't know about you, but most guys, in their WHOLE LIFE, have not had 22 women. But this little hyper-nympho had **3** three spiral notebooks of her conquests.
The statutory laws were designed to protect naive teens (preteens are covered in a different law) from predatory older folks. Hardly the case here. This girl knew what she wanted, went after it, and documented her sexual fiestas.
What I want to know is with a case THIS clear how come no one is trying to bring charges against her for CONSPIRACY to commit statutory rape. I mean, we all KNOW the reason why they don't (and many laws won't allow the "victim" to be prosecuted), but this "poor little angel" knew exactly what she was doing. She knew it was wrong, didn't give a flying fuck what happened to these guys she, supposedly, "cared about", and she's probably being treated as some "victim" and having her feelings of non-guilt reaffirmed.
And ... how about THIS judicial BULLSHIT:
Quote:
"A federal appeals court in February upheld the legality of the registry, saying simply being included on it doesn't imply those listed are a danger to society."
So, the registry is NOT for informing the public to danger (HUH?) ....
And supplying the names and ADDRESSES is NOT a danger to the people on it.
And of course the "victims advocate" chimes in: (funny, when boys are molested we can't ever seem to find these folks)
Quote:
"Laura Ahearn, executive director of Stony Brook, N.Y.-based Parents for Megan's Law, a nonprofit group that operates a national help line with information about sex offenders and sexual abuse prevention.
``We're talking about a statutory situation here,'' she said. ``Every single state has an age-buffer law. A minor is a minor, and that's why you have laws to protect them.''
OHHHHH, it's the LAW ... "we're helpless folks, it's the law" (sounds like Lorianne). Funny, the very folks who ADVOCATE FOR THE LAW feign innocence when it's applied like this.
But when we have some 14 year old who is a sexual predator of older men - we don't mention that. And this is the PERFECT case for this issue to be brought up.
Let be real here. Girls date older men. Hardly is it EVER the reverse. EVERYONE knows this. But nothing is done to give these "poor innocent deers" pause from engaging in this.
(gotta be a short post: I'm home for lunch)
Steven
Guerilla Gender Warfare is just Hate Speech in polite text
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Very well spoken, LS.
OMS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
So the ADA made a deal and then this deal is set aside later.
No, he broke the deal. The deal was conditional on him not breaking the conditions of his parole. This type of deal is made all the time for all kinds of crimes .... if you break your parole, the deal is off.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Teenagers who had consensual sex with someone close in age should not be removed from the list, said Laura Ahearn, executive director of Stony Brook, N.Y.-based Parents for Megan's Law, a nonprofit group that operates a national help line with information about sex offenders and sexual abuse prevention.
``We're talking about a statutory situation here,'' she said. ``Every single state has an age-buffer law. A minor is a minor, and that's why you have laws to protect them.''
In response to the various registries which consistently target a certain gender, what about creating a national registry of anti-male bigots? The registry could contain quotes like this one; it need not (and probably should not) contain much else, aside from a neutral capsule summary of the context in which the quote was taken.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
by Anonymous User on 01:21 PM May 12th, 2004 EST (#25)
|
|
|
|
|
A national registry of anti-male bigots?
Is it possible to even MAKE a list that long...?
Thundercloud.
"Hoka hey!"
|
|
|
|
|
[an error occurred while processing this directive]
|
