|
This discussion has been archived.
No new comments can be posted.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
invalid form key jibba jabba
Which of the two do you think is more likely to whore himself out to the anti-male femelitist voting bloc?
Kerry?
Or Bush?
Oh, without a doubt, Kerry is going to do more pandering. What I love about neocons though, is how they blame this all on the democratic party and vote solidly republican, even though the GOP hasn't done men any(check the sponsors) favors either. Idiots.
The younger generation is becoming more and more neocon all the time
Well I sure hope not, since being a neocon means having a dead brain and no concept of logic, reasoning, or consistency.
'South Park Republicanism', it's called.
Uh huh. And I suppose you just ignored all the anti war and pro gay themes on the show?
So. I have a suggestion for you. Rather than beating up on Bush, republicans, and conservativism, which only serves to make me dismiss you as just yet another liberal moonbat negative campaigner,
"Beating up", eh? I suppose you are one of those lazy ass, armchair patriot neocons who thinks that questioning the president (providing he's a republican, of course) is un-American? Lets go through the main subjects of my last post:Undisputed fact: Bush pushed for enormous tax breaks.
Undisupted fact: he launched two very costly wars in Iraq and Afganistan.
Undisupted fact: the economy went into a recession
Undisupted fact: Bush made no attempt whatsoever to either roll back his tax cuts OR slash spending to make up for the lost revenue
Undisupted fact: Bush's reason for invading Iraq was because Saddam possesed WMD's and was an imminent threat to world security
Undisupted fact: no stockpiles of WMD's have been found.
Undisupted fact: millions of jobs have been lost.
Undisupted fact: Bush is the Commander and Chief and the responsibility of going to war rests on his shoulders.
why not go spend your resources in a generative fashion by working for Kerry and within the democrats to make them more favorable towards men's issues, and thereby attractive to me?
Rather than making demands on other people, how bout you get off your own ass and get politicians to recognize men's issues?
And your own criticisms likewise only make me turn away in disgust at your inability to place men's issues ahead of your partisan prejudices.
Blah blah blah. Its called not being a single issue voter. I also care about the economy, reckless wars and national security, and Bush gets dubious to failing marks in all three of those.
I am not pro-Bush. But after the past thirty years of hypocrisy and pandering to anti-male femelitism, I am so primed to reject the democrat and liberal viewpoint that it's not even close to funny. And now, their transnational progressivist agenda scares the living hell out of me, and I want no part of it.
What do you do then, vote Liberterian? Name a single peice of pro-feminist legislation, and chances are VERY high that it has a Republican sponsor. Or how about all the dead beat dad crackdowns from Republican govenors and Republican states attorney generals. It's like saying the Republicans are too beholden to special interests, so you'll only vote Democratic, retardedly ignoring all the special interest groups the Democrats are beholden to. Both parties roll over for the feminazies, deal with it.
It's just that simple. You need to grow past the limited tactical concept that this kind of partisan negative campaigning against Bush, the republicans, and conservativism in general, is at all persuasive to independents like myself. We're sick of it. It just makes us turn you off and look for mature dialogue.
And we're finding it with the neocons.
Oh, I see, you're a comedian. Here's some choice quotes from "mature neocons" for you:"Two things made this country great: White men & Christianity. The degree these two have diminished is in direct proportion to the corruption and fall of the nation. Every problem that has arisen (sic) can be directly traced back to our departure from God's Law and the disenfranchisement of White men." - State Rep. Don Davis (R-NC), e-mailed to every member of the North Carolina House and Senate, reported by The Fayetteville Observer, 08-22-01"There are some who feel that, you know, the conditions are such that they can attack us there. My answer is, bring 'em on. We have the force necessary to deal with the situation." - George W. Bush, The Chicago Tribune, 07-03-03 "The fact of the matter is that this (increased American casualties) is a sign of the success of our operation, not its failure." - Ralph Reed, GOP strategist, on MSNBC's program 'Hardball,' 10-28-03 "We're going to keep building the party until we're hunting Democrats with dogs." - Sen. Phil Gramm (R-Texas), Mother Jones, 08-95 "Emotional appeals about working families trying to get by on $4.25 an hour are hard to resist. Fortunately, such families do not exist." - Rep. Tom DeLay (R-Texas), House Majority Whip, during a debate on increasing the minimum wage, Congressional Record, H3706, 04-23-96 "My only regret with Timothy McVeigh is he did not go to The New York Times building." - Ann Coulter, The New York Observer, 08-26-02 "We need to execute people like John Walker in order to physically intimidate liberals, by making them realize that they can be killed, too. Otherwise, they will turn out to be outright traitors." - Ann Coulter, at the Conservative Political Action Conference, 02-26-02
And finally, saving the best for last "I'm the commander—see, I don't need to explain—I don't need to explain why I say things. That's the interesting thing about being the President. Maybe somebody needs to explain to me why they say something, but I don't feel like I owe anybody an explanation." - George W. Bush, Washington Post, 11-19-02 And comments like this are the rule rather than the exception. Like I said, no logic, reasoning or consistency.
Please think about this. I am not interested in debating or arguing this with you. And trying to make me do so will only indicate how badly you're not listening to me.
Why, because you're not opinionated, you're just always right? Looks like I just proved you wrong.
|
|
|
|
|
[an error occurred while processing this directive]
|
