|
This discussion has been archived.
No new comments can be posted.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
This kind of article will get NO mention in the Feminazi literature. It defeats the "victim" status of their cause. It's really really annoying that these same women who fight for Affirmative Action in the name of "equality" use constant disinformation to sweep under the rug any signs that men and women have reached parity.
First we recently read about how the "wage gap" is still "in effect". Now, we MRAs know this "study" ignores wealth transfer, women's choices to work or not, and a myriad of other factors, and THAT gets nationwide publication. But, when a story like THIS comes out, it will just be ignored.
Figures
Steven Beene
Guerilla Gender Warfare is just Hate Speech in polite text
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
by Anonymous User on Friday December 26, @06:25AM EST (#2)
|
|
|
|
|
"this "study" ignores wealth transfer, women's choices to work or not, and a myriad of other factors, and THAT gets nationwide publication."
Tip of the ice berg indeed, when it comes to presenting a balanced picture of the economic conditions in men's and women's lives. What benefits a woman, that isn't being figured into their entitlement formulas, is very significant.
When addressing women's victimization (historical oppression) I say, "historical oppression compared to what or who?" Certainly not honestly compared to men, who as privileged patriarchs have known their equal or greater share of horrendous oppression and abuse in their lives (just in different ways, war, etc.). Too bad their wives were left behind to be economically depressed by their passing, but "Hey femi, you're just economically oppressed, they're dead."
True to women's studies the militant feminist movement only looks at the women's side of the equation, and thereby skews the formula completely out of reality. Neither men, nor women exist in a vacuum so why are we constantly looking, calling attention to, and reporting on women's well being to the exclusion of men's. It's definitely time for a paradigm shift, I'm going to talk to my publicist about this, just as soon as I hire one. That'll happen just as soon as I get the equality and economic opportunity, that I've so oppressively been denied just for being a male. Working jobs that "historically," "statistically," kill you before your time should pay far more than I'm making.
It is time men took back their rights to equality beginning with the women dominated industry know as education. That man-hating environment is the spawn of the biased women's studies programs responsible for so much of the disinformation that plagues American society (not to mention the active political recruiting of new converts that goes on there).
Why in the heck does that piece of "hate legislation" known as Title IX do nothing to address the below 50% areas where men are not equally represented in education. Education in America today is rampant with sexist, hate monger bigots that are incessantly spending, and spending to empower women, and ignoring areas were men need to be empowered to have equality with women. If your looking for a really cushy job, that requires a minimum of effort to earn your pay, I suggest a career as a top administrator in higher education (an area heavily dominated, where I have observed, by women). Yes, men are truly 2nd class citizens throughout higher education and descending rapidly across that spectrum.
...and oh yea, as to the cushy administrative jobs in higher education, the average fair minded man doesn't have a snowballs chance in L.A. of getting one. It just isn't in the "tyranny of tolerance" deck of cards known as "political correctness."
Ray
|
|
|
|
|
[an error occurred while processing this directive]
|
