|
This discussion has been archived.
No new comments can be posted.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exposing these practises will get defence attornies asking embarassing questions.
Again, learn the law and tell everyone about the set up that was shown here. How the hell can anyone get a fair shake if they are so prejudiced against its sickening.
People told me I was paranoid when I was talking about systamatic discrimination the article shown here implicates it and is hard evidence that it exists.
When the whole system and everyone that works in it are doing more to prove your guilt and deny your side of the story exists for no apparent reason other than that you are a man.
Its really funny, one has to go to law school for years, be a lawyer for decades to be a judge. If I had of known that all I had to do to determine the outcomes of criminal cases was to work in shelters and give seminars and hand out other people's money I wouldnt have wasted my time. Kind of glad I didnt become a judge, it might make me look like a puppet among other things. Same goes for the rest of them.
.
Dan Lynch
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
by Anonymous User on Sunday October 20, @02:40AM EST (#2)
|
|
|
|
|
Dan,
Amen, brother.
I know I've said something like this before, but I just DO NOT understand why some people can't see when their actions are bigoted, by their very nature.
I guess it's easier for one to believe what is convienient, rather than let the facts get in the way of ones beliefes.
Thundercloud.
"Hoka-hey!"
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
If evil police dept's. like the LAPD spent as much time documenting the truth as they do rationalizing and fabricating evidence based on their sefl-fulfilling profiling prejudices of domestic violence, then there wouldn't be so many innocent men being viciously abused by these hypocrites who committ atrocties worst than those they falsely allege to have occurrred.
"Frau and Fraulein uber alas. The herstorical, radical feminist candlelight vigils for the female victims of domestic violence remind me of the Nazi's torch light parade(s) of the 1930's complete with the human rights atroctities against targeted groups that followed.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments to the U.S. Constitution are pertinent to this issue and are, apparantley UNCONSTITUTIONALLY not being followed.
They pertinent sections of the sameread as follows:
ARTICLE FOURTEEN July 28, 1868
Section 1.
-
All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the
State wherein they reside. No State shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any State deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws.
ARTICLE FIVE
-
No person shall be held to answer for a capital, or otherwise infamous crime, unless on a presentment or indictment of a Grand Jury,
except in cases arising in the land or naval forces, or in the militia,when in actual service in time of war or public danger; nor shall any
person be subject for the same offence to be twice put in jeopardy of life or limb; nor shall be compelled in any criminal case to be a
witness against himself, nor be deprived of life, liberty, or property,without due process of law; nor shall private property be taken for public use, without just compensation.
C.V. Compton Shaw
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
by Anonymous User on Monday October 21, @01:19PM EST (#10)
|
|
|
|
|
cshaw,
You know what you could do? email copies of the 14th and 15th amendments to the police stations, "family" courts, women's shelters and the N.O.W..
Attatched, of course, the stats on false arrests of men, on DV charges.
Heck, I might even do that, myself, where I live.
(Might wanna be carefull about sending anything to police stations, though.)
Thundercloud.
"Hoka-hey!"
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
No greater conspiracy of evil oppression has ever been perpetrated on an innocent group of men in the history sadistic psychological warfare than the VAWA. Herstory will remember Hitler, Stalin and the authors of the VAWA for the unAmerican abusive stranglers of freedom that they are.
The people who enforce the VAWA are nothing less the modern day version of Hitler's evil brown shirted thugs. MR. BUSH, TEAR DOWN THE EVIL VAWA!
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
I say, ZERO TOLERANCE for Nazi laws like the unconstitutional VAWA and police dept's. Nazi domestic violence policies like Brockton, Mass and L.A., CA. Write your elected representatives and give them hell. After all they already given it to men with the VAWA.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Repeal the VAWA? Zero tolerance for VAWA? Geesh. I am feeling right at home here! The biggest problem is that there is not one member of congress who is willing to take a stand and expose the hateful sexism built into the bill. They are all living in fear of the fems. What a bunch of cowards. Our country is in trouble.
This is a problem but also offers us the opportunity to take a stand. Have you written your congressmen and senators? Here's mine. I am planning in the future to put up a web page that will automatically find your representatives and will email them a template message about VAWA and sexism against men in the DV industry. I hope to have it going within the next month. We will see.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
by Anonymous User on Monday October 21, @01:37PM EST (#11)
|
|
|
|
|
((("They are all living in fear of the fems. What a bunch of cowards. Our country is in trouble.")))
Dr. Evil,
You got that right.
Any Democratic\Republic that tramples on the constitutional and civil rights of ANY of it's citizens is indeed one that is in trouble!
ESPECIALLY when that 'Government' is coherced by intimidation, as is the U.S., Canada, Australia, and western Euroupe. This intimidation comes from a (realitively)small group of people. (feminists.)
When a small group DICTATES to a Government, You KNOW someting is 'out of whack'.
As far as our Government being afraid of the fem-bots, They had BETTER be more afraid of US.
We are the law abideing, but growing Men's movement. And we've had ENOUGH!
Thundercloud.
"Hoka-hey!"
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
by Anonymous User on Sunday October 20, @07:04PM EST (#8)
|
|
|
|
|
She is on record and in the media about how the justice system in MA needs an overhaul and how it is corrupt with leftist/feminist judicial Marxism that has eroded the rights of men/fathers. Unfortunately, she comes across as being less than credible in appearance and demeanor, but she is straight on the facts and is a good woman.
Please support Barb Johnson (INDEPENDENT) if you are in MA. She is the only one addressing reality, all the other candidates want to "toughen up" domestic laws ...sic....??
From her website - Americans do not want "gender wars" and "culture wars"
http://www.barbforgovernor.com/
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
I mean maybe you will lose, but a political campaign will bring a spot light to the issues. It will give you a chance to to be independant and take on the world. Submit the truth and the destruction. If you are not worried about a career in politics anyways then campaigning without the fear of losing is a brilliant way to spread the word.
Dan Lynch
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dan:
I once worked with an outspoken janitor who ran for Governor of California several times. To the best of my recollection he just payed his filing fees and ran. He even got more votes than some lawyers running in the primary.
I've never done it, but I suspect it would be an experience, an education, a platform, an expense and eventually a disappointment. It would be really interesting to do this, especially promoting a men's rights platform based on the issues we've discussed here. It might make quite a stir if you could get the right exposure. Just think of all the new names the feminists would think up to call you once they found out you were pro men's rights.
I don't have enough finesse to run for any office. My campaign slogan would be, "Vote for Ray or Drop Dead. Either Way Your Better Off than Voting for a Feminist" Feel free to use that if you run for office.
Go For It,
Ray
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
by Anonymous User on Tuesday October 22, @01:51PM EST (#16)
|
|
|
|
|
Ray,
If you or ANY man ran for office, on a "pro-man" platform, The feminists would likely (and successfuly) destroy your 'good name' in a HEARBEAT!
They have the media in their 'back pockett'.
And they would use it to their FULL advantage. They would throw at you the usual (false) alegation(s) that you: "hate women", want to "set back women's rights", "re-inforce the "patriarchy"", "take away "choice" for women", Blah, Blah, Blah!
We've all seen this done by the feminists countless times. They even do it to pro-man Females! Calling them "anti-proggressive" and such.
If anyone, pro-man, WANTS to run for office, I say go for it.
Just be prepared for the inevitable.
Frankly, I've been considering it MYSELF.
...we'll see...,
Thundercloud.
"Hoka-hey!"
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
I still trying to figure out what happened. My future ex kicked in the door and busted the door frame. I came home and called the police, showed them the frame and door, they told her to file a domestic violence charge againest me. A EX-parte restraining order was filed. I was removed from the house. Twenty days later I was asked if I wanted to go back. I said no 15 minutes later I was ordered to pay child support and spousal support of almost $2,000 a month. I only make $3,000 a month. I have custody of my oldest son who she tried to have arrestted three different times! We lived in a borrowed RV for three months. We finally moved in to a rental trailer, we live day to day. I filed for divorce. THE SYSTEM IS BROKE!
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
by Anonymous User on Monday October 21, @09:56PM EST (#14)
|
|
|
|
|
Today restraining orders are used more often to remove a man from a woman's life because there is something wrong with her or the relationship than they are used to protect women from actual batterers. The problem with this is that it almost always the men rendered indigent, because this is what the federal government trains the courts and police to do, otherwise the courts and police dept's will lose there precious grants and have to uphold liberty and due process....what a horrible thing...sic...
You are lucky she didn't make a false claim of abuse against you (this is what divorce lawyers and court appointed personel recommend) as you would have found yourself locked up while waiting for a pretrial without any examination of the facts, and then all sorts of feminist training and a long probation which is designed for failure, if not this -than jail time.
Good luck, find a good lawyer and appeal as often as you can...
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
by Anonymous User on Monday October 21, @09:57PM EST (#15)
|
|
|
|
|
Today restraining orders are used more often to remove a man from a woman's life because there is something wrong with her or the relationship than they are used to protect women from actual batterers. The problem with this is that it almost always the men rendered indigent, because this is what the federal government trains the courts and police to do, otherwise the courts and police dept's will lose there precious grants and have to uphold liberty and due process....what a horrible thing...sic...
You are lucky she didn't make a false claim of abuse against you (this is what divorce lawyers and court appointed personel recommend) as you would have found yourself locked up while waiting for a pretrial without any examination of the facts, and then all sorts of feminist training and a long probation which is designed for failure, if not this -than jail time.
Good luck, find a good lawyer and appeal as often as you can...
|
|
|
|
|
[an error occurred while processing this directive]
|
