|
This discussion has been archived.
No new comments can be posted.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
What is really encouraging about this report is that a man who was accused of the dreaded 'sexual harassment' libel actually counter sued rather than letting the lawyers cut a deal; ie. give the poor abused lady a personal apology, the police department agrees to institute mandatory sexual harassment seminars given by NOW Inc., and finally and most important, the state cuts the little lady a $check$ to sooth and restore her sense of safety and security.
This time it went the opposite way because for once an accused man didn't 'roll over' and/or 'cave'!
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
This time it went the opposite way because for once an accused man didn't 'roll over' and/or 'cave'!
I just cannot help but wonder how many falsely accused men that officer placed under arrest and prosecuted. Perhaps that police force will begin to realize that they should not enforce laws that violate basic civil liberties.
It amazes me that we have President Bush telling the generals of Sadam not to obey illegal orders. Yet our own brainwashed police force is supposed to arrest any falsely accused male and destroy their lives with the power of the state.
The hypocrisy is beyond immoral. It has reached a point where these officers need to be criminally prosecuted for upholding illegal law.
Warble
Disclaimer: My statements are intended to be personal opinion, belief, sarcasm, or allegation.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
"I just cannot help but wonder how many falsely accused men that officer placed under arrest and prosecuted. Perhaps that police force will begin to realize that they should not enforce laws that violate basic civil liberties."
You are absolutely correct. This 'man' is unfortunately part of the enforcement apparatus of the state. In other words this cop carries out the state's dirty work in oppressing other men under the Draconian and misandric domestic laws of the anti male state of Massachusetts.
However, I must clarify that I admire his victory over that drunken feminazi twit as a man and not in his capacity as a cop. Why do you think they call them 'pigs'? I personally do not care for or like cops.
Yes, if a man who wasn't a cop was accused of the same thing, then I would speculate that he would probably have a tougher time proving his innocence.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
"Yes, if a man who wasn't a cop was accused of the same thing, then I would speculate that he would probably have a tougher time proving his innocence. "
Hey, I thought the burden of proof is sopposed to be on their shoulders. You know *prove* beyond a reasonable doubt he is guilty not the other way around.
Of course I know what its all about just like the rest of us. ~wink~
Like I said, I do find that most men in such 'authorities' tend to win their cases. I think a lot of this has to do with the knowledge of the law and their rights.
I'd like to take a moment and bring up a word about Jamie Nelson. Jamie Nelson was a man who spent three and a half years in penetenatry for rape. He was accused by his ex-wife's best friend the *night* before a custody trial with his ex-wife over his child.
The woman has gone on to become a serial accusor, and the courts finally set Jamie Nelson free. The one bad thing about this is, Jamie Nelson had absolute proof that he was in a different city altogether the night of the allegation. The judge of the time convicted Neslson based on her word and her word alone.
I forget her name, if I find it I will post it. The bitch who falsely accused me is named Candace Varga, she is also a serial accusor and quite psychotic. She is immature and very selfish. I had two witnesses in my trial and the same thing happened they were dismissed for frivilous reasons. Judge Brian Stead and Crown Atorney John Ayres and Sgt Timmons all acted underhandedly in one way or another.
Sgt Timmons with held important information during the trial that may have exhonorated me. The police are not to be trusted.
.
Dan Lynch
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
by Anonymous User on Monday October 14, @02:35AM EST (#9)
|
|
|
|
|
Dan.
=Whew=, Consider yourself VERY lucky.
As I have stated before, It is because of the Ms. Vargas in the world that I steer clear of intamacy with women all together.
BTW, I have an interesting story for you, and any one else who's interested.
Yesterday evening, I was at a "DENNY'S" restaraunt, for dinner. There were two women sitting behind me, in another booth. I could not HELP but "over hear" their conversation.
One woman was (very loudly) proudly telling the other about how she had "Beat the crap" out of her boyfriend "last night." The other woman was just delighted to hear it. "You've got to show men, these days who's boss!" the first woman said.
Man, I almost lost it.
I tried to ignore them. You know, take the "high road", But they just went on and on about it.
Finally, I had had it, when the second woman said something like; "That's why men have dicks, so we can lead them around like dogs." That did it. I turned around in my seat to look at them and I asked them: "Would you ladies like it if, while YOU'RE trying to eat, I was sitting here talking about WOMEN haveing vaginas so that men have a nice convienient handle to carry WOMEN around?"
They both looked at me ready to say something, but they saw I was an Indian, and seemed "dumb struck" or something. (That makes me even madder.)
Finally one of them said "Well, why don't you mind your own biuness?" I said, "I'd LOVE to, but when you talk louder than a bull horn, it's a little hard to do." Before they could say anything else, I said, "...And violence isn't funny, no matter WHO'S the victim of it."
I could'nt believe what the first woman said next, "Well, he had it comeing!"
That's a line right out of the misandrist's hand book. Then she got even more defencive and told me, "Besides, Men are bigger than women, It's not the same."
And I said, "Do you think it's okay for humans to abuse elephants? They're bigger than ANY human, and it's against the law to abuse THEM too."
Her replie..., "Elephants are animals."
My replie, "I fail to follow your logic, according to you two, MEN are animals too."
At that point she said "Man, F#&k you." and she and her partner in stupidity got up and went to another table far away from me. (GOOD!)
I didn't hear another word out of them, even when I got up to leave.
Normaly, I DO try not to do things like that. And I won't make a habit of it in the future, But I have to say, right or wrong, it felt really GOOD!
Thundercloud.
'Hoka-hey!'
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Thundercloud,
In a case like this when you overhear two loudmouth bu**holes like these two females, I would just follow the old adage, "if it feels good then do it!" Good for you! :)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
by Anonymous User on Monday October 14, @08:17AM EST (#11)
|
|
|
|
|
Luek.
Well..., I might just start doing it a little more often. (^_^)
I'll have to be careful, though, When it comes to the "do it if it feels good" thing. It would have felt good to throw my (very) hot coffee at them, or my steak. ...No, wait, too expensive.
These two "women" weren't even worth throwing the coffee at, and that particular cup was the FREE re-fill.
As I've said, I really DO try not to be "mean", But women like that really need the proverbial attitude adjustment.
If I weren't a "cripple" I'd possibly have turned them over my knee and... No, wait, they'd probably have Liked that.
Well any way, I just felt "they had it comeing".
I have enough agrivation.
Thundercloud.
"Hoka-hey!"
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Normaly, I DO try not to do things like that. And I won't make a habit of it in the future, But I have to say, right or wrong, it felt really GOOD!
Stories like this just piss me off. I'm getting a cell phone A.S.A.P. If I overhear a woman admitting that she beat her husband I'm dialing 911 and reporting the woman. I'm going to demand an arrest for D.V. and a full investigation. If the police fail to respond and make the arrest then I'll file a complaint for failing to enforce the mandatory arrest laws.
I've had it with women getting off when then commit endless criminal acts. A public admission like the one you heard has got to be prosecutable. It is like hearing somebody confessing that they committed a murder to another person. You heard the admission of the guilt.
Guess that makes me more radical than Thundercloud. :) Me? I wouldn't say a word to those bitches. I'd just call the police to take her away.
Warble
Disclaimer: My statements are intended to be personal opinion, belief, sarcasm, or allegation.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
by Anonymous User on Tuesday October 15, @11:55PM EST (#13)
|
|
|
|
|
Warble,
I hear you.
Has anyone here ever heared a MAN boasting about abuseing his wife\girlfriend? I haven't.
This isn't the first time I've heared a woman (or women) jokeing about abuseing a man. I have heared it a number of times in fact.
What makes THIS incident different, was the fact that I said something to them.
other times, I just "put up" with it.
I also had to consider the possibility that the one woman was "makeing it up" to impress her freind.
I have personaly known women who were generaly nice people, whom never laid a hand on their husbands or boyfriends, but boasted about beating them up, all the time, to their girl friends.
When I confronted this woman, she didn't act so tough, then. If she were the "great man slayer" she was makeing herself out to be, she would have possibly gone 'Bruce Lee' on me. Instead she tells me, "F#&k you!" and leaves.
Any way whether she REALLY did (does) abuse her boyfriend or not, The fact she was being loud and obnoxious, not to mention vulgar and sexist, while others (like me) were minding our own buisness, trying to eat in peace, was more than enough reason to confront her.
The thing that gets me most is, that women can proclaim publicly that they are abuseive, and no one seems to care.
Just let ANY man try that.
Earlier I stated the two women seemed "dumb-struck" because I am Indian. But maybe, instead, it's because they, like most women, aren't used to ANYONE saying "ENOUGH allready!"
Thundercloud.
"Hoka-hey!"
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
by Anonymous User on Sunday October 13, @03:01AM EST (#6)
|
|
|
|
|
((("I just can not help but wonder how many falsely accused men that officer placed under arrest and prosecuted.")))
Warb.
You read my mind.
Thundercloud.
'Hoka-hey!'
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
I, personally, know of one young lady, who, about 30 years ago, made a career of making false accusations of sexual misconduct against men including police officers. She falsely accused two different police officers of sexual misconduct and falsely accused several other males (I don't know how many) of sexual misconduct. Although all of the accusations, to my knowledge were proven false, this woman received, to my knowledge no punishment for the same. It is relatively clear to me that she knew that her false accusations would be seen as tantamount to proven guilt, that those males who were so accused would be treated without due process and considered guilty, and that she would not face any repercussions for her false accusations. Her motives were clear, the oppression and discrimination of men, which she saw necessary to promulgate which promulgation was reinforced by laws, customs, and a culture which favored the same gender sexism.
C.V. Compton Shaw
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
by Anonymous User on Saturday October 12, @08:30AM EST (#2)
|
|
|
|
|
In MA the whole judicial system is highly biased against men in any matter involving a woman. The lawyer (defendant) in this case knew the system would be highly sympathetic to her despite the fact the she was (like many woman do) trying to skirt any accountability for her actions. And that she could turn the tables of justice simply by 'playing' the abuse trump card.
Being a man charged with anything 'domestic or sexual' in MA automatically insures that you are guilty before the facts, the police are trained to ignore evidential evidence and arrest the man in all matters. Police departments that have been trained by NOW Inc. use the system to complicate matters for men. In this case, it was one of their own who was the victim of false allegations, and they had the power to show the world that -yes, women do use a system that was intended as a ‘shield for protection' often end up using it as a 'sword of vindictive attack' against men. Every woman knows she can use the system to easily ruin men’s lives, divorce attorneys encourage it, and the whole system is stacked against any man that ends up in this "meat grinder" whether he is guilty or not.
There has to be higher accountability for false allegations. Mandatory sentences, and civil proceedings.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
It would also put the system at great risk if their 'boys' were the ones labled as assaultests.
Much like the NOW gang they turn a blind eye to abuse towards women and children when it suits them. From OJ to Clinton to a dozen others. Even in voilence agianst women in Lesbian relationships.
I fear that not every man has the same objective stance as that officer. But eventually the stuff leads into common law.
The system protects itself first than the special interest groups second men last.
It is also my opinion that men, judges lawyers prosicution etc... protect women not just because of traditions but because they think with their dick instead of their head.
Thats right, I bet if you look at cases that have gone in favour of women I bet many of them were 'good looking' and that looks are more important in court than facts althogether.
,.
Dan Lynch
|
|
|
|
|
[an error occurred while processing this directive]
|
