|
This discussion has been archived.
No new comments can be posted.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
He is a perfect example of the zombiefication of some men when they take femitnazi's seriously!
"""He tells men at his workshop that women do not commit domestic violence - men do."""
I guess he had his head up his butt when Susan Smith and Andrea Yates committed their little random acts of domestic violence. Oh! I forgot! Men were really responsible for making these emotionally abused murderers commit their crimes. I think poor old Don would buy into that line. He must have played football without a good helmet!
>>> PASS THE WORD!
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For some reason the last part of the post above did not print.
Here is the remainder.
REMEMBER, ALL OF SEPTEMBER IS PROSTATE CANCER AWARENESS MONTH >>>PASS THE WORD!
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
by Anonymous User on Monday September 16, @12:52AM EST (#3)
|
|
|
|
|
Ladies and Gentlemen.
I present to you Don McPherson, The very personification of a "WUSSY-POOPIE." A.K.A. a Fem-boy.
As long as male voices speak on behalf of feminism, Feminism will continue to have "credibility".
Appearantly, ol' Donny-boy has never been to Divorce court.
Of course I could be wrong. But if he has, With his feminized mentality, He probably figures he DESERVES to be treated like a 3rd class citizen.
Hey, Donny, why don't you get your head out of your @$$ to make room for shoveing your anti-male thingy up there? Take your medicine Donny, and quit BRAIN-WASHING even more men to think like you do. That is if you even bother to think at all, which you probably don't.
Aside from the Feminists themselves, it is the WUSSY-POOPIES (like Donny) who are our greatest enemies.
Thundercloud.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Like "Rosie!" another example of the pointless murder of helpless trees.
I wonder if my library has this magazine? I'd love to read this garbage as I am normally very big on keeping up to date on what the enemies of God and Man are up to, but the idea of actually paying for it gives me a tic.
Okay, Don MacPherson, you have been found guilty on all counts of consorting with the enemy, and of high treason against masculinity. Therefore, in accordance with the prescribed penalties of the Man Code, and by the power vested in me as Magistrate of this court, I hereby order your testicles revoked. You are given thirty days to comply, and to cease and desist using the title of "mister" or masculine articles and pronouns in reference to yourself.
So Ordered, this 16 day of September, Year of Our Lord 2002, in the 1st District court of Maleness; Judge Gonzo, presiding.
As Bugs Bunny would say, "What a maroon!"
---- Burn, Baby, Burn ----
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Well, we can continue to disparage this guy, clueless as he is (or maybe not!) or we can try to engage him in the debate and perhaps educate him a little bit.
1) If we continue to attack him, he'll never listen to us,
2) He may well be playing the "gender card" as a matter of increasing his personal notariety and wealth (which suck, but then it's also been done before),
3) He may well have an open enough mind to listen to our position and consider an appropriate program to operate in response.
I haven't read the article (I refuse to touch that publication), but has he said anything disparaging of the men's movement? Perhaps, as we seem to agree, he has been completely hijacked and brainwashed and is absolutely clueless about the other side of the story.
3)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
"Well, we can continue to disparage this guy, clueless as he is (or maybe not!) or we can try to engage him in the debate and perhaps educate him a little bit."
I believe this guys being paid to say what he's saying. Or he's under a court order or a condition to use his fame and spread this propaganda because he hit or had a fight with his wife, blah blah blah.
I am suspicious of this whole thing. I think fembots are taking my own advice of trying to enter our cause to the sports world.
.
Dan Lynch
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gee, Dan, you think they stop by and read what's going on here? :-)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
"Gee, Dan, you think they stop by and read what's going on here? "
lol
Well we can't call it paranoia if they REALLY are out to get you, can we?
Of course I am also a bit of an egomaniac.
.
Dan Lynch
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Is it just me, or are the fembots trying to invade sports media. Are they spending a large chunk of change to tell men what rotton bastards they have been and how oppressed women have been throughout the centuries.
Are they trying to justify Feminism's existance. ARe they trying to get the message to the majority of men before men's movement really starts up?
I was watching football at my parents and the comercials on the stations were of how women gained the vote in Canada. I would have to admit there were some tremendous amounts of 'omission's' of facts in these comercials.
I also found it interesting that one of the lines in the "heritage commercial" goes something like "If men have the right to vote than divorce will sky rocket". Spoken in a parody by the woman lobbiest protrayal. Ironically divorce did skyrocket after the vote.
But what pissed me off the most is that they omitted that fact that it was MEN who voted in women's right to vote. Or else, how could they have gotton it? They also omitted that many women also opposed women's right to vote.
But is feminist trying to gain support from sports watchers?
.
Dan Lynch
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Look, you know it all comes down to marketing again. Nike saturated the white men's sports market long ago, and now they see rising affluence among blacks (in my opinion welcome affluence) and rising interest in sports among women. It's no secret: ESPN wants a piece of that pie, too, and they'll do whatever makes good business sense to gain it. I suspect they realize that the market for sport among women will top-out at a lower level of saturation than with men, but they have a ways to go. They want those advertising dollars and they're going to sell masculinity down the river to get them. I suggest this: ESPN's core audience is going to be men, regardless of what the Martina Navritolova's of the world say. So we should watch them VERY closely, and when they do something stupid (like agreeing to continue to broadcast that ridiculously insulting Southwest Airlines ad) we should do what we can to bring them up short. In fact, I suggest that we establish an "ESPN Watch" section of the media watch section just to do that.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
" They want those advertising dollars and they're going to sell masculinity down the river to get them."
Oddly I feel a bit relieved. Its over money instead of actual hatred and demonization.
Things are looking up after all.
.
Dan Lynch
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As far as the advertising dollars are concerned, it's ALWAYS been about the money, and it always will be. That's what's driving the whole anti-male culture in in television. Women's consumer decisions so overwhelm men's, regardless of who is responsible for generating the income, that advertising companies feel quite licensed to use whatever methods don't offend women. That includes offending men. The sooner we are able to establish adverse economic impact, the sooner this will change.
|
|
|
|
|
[an error occurred while processing this directive]
|
