CA Case Decision Advances Cause of Fathers

	posted by Matt on 09:34 PM June 27th, 2006
	Marc A. writes "This decision (.pdf file) is a must-read. It just came down yesterday from the 2nd District Court of Appeal (Los Angeles) and overturns a disgusting decision by a dependency court judge, making it very clear how shocked the appellate court is a the lower court judge's attitude toward this potential father who wanted a DNA test before the child was permanently placed in foster care. A drug-addicted mother couldn't care for the child, so the child was placed in foster care temporarily. Mother didn't give names of possible fathers, but later told Jesus H. he might be the dad. Jesus immediately comes to the DCFS, just before the child turns 1 and just before the court permanently places the child in foster care. DCFS refuses to let Jesus see the child but tells him to appear at the upcoming hearing. He did. Ultimately the court refuses him a DNA test, treats him like garbarge, and acts like he should have come forward sooner. Even the child's own attorney waffles on its position. Jesus appealed on his own with a handwritten notice of appeal. DCFS fought him and even tried to argue his notice was insufficient. The appellate court wrote this scathing decision reversing the judge's order and repeatedly quoting the judge to show how outrageous her reasoning was."

<  The Elitist Feminist Trash Can Runneth Over | Sick Judge, Sick D.A., Sick Jury Won't Listen to False Accuser's Recant  >

  

This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

The Kid Will Be Three Years Old Before Resolution? (Score:2) by Roy on 11:34 PM June 27th, 2006 EST (#1) I would not dispute that this is a kind of "victory" for unwed fathers seeking to establish paternity, custody, or even merely fair visitation with their presumed children. But what this Appelate Court ruling did was just create two or more years of legal process that entails -- - Jesus (the petitioning dad) gets to undergo psychiatric tests up the ying-yang to determine if he's a decent man and qualified to be a custodial father - a paternity test will be mandated. His baby's-momma has a track record of promiscuity, so he faces at least a 33% chance he's NOT the biological dad - the appelate judge ruled that ALL issues related to the permanent plan for the child's well-being and custodial assignment must be reconsidered Bottom line, Jesus' baby may well be in high school before all the legal parasites are done feeding on this case. (It was fun to read the appelate judge rip the feminazi judge a new one by damning her reasoning as well as her inefficiency, and reassigning the case to another judge. In the rarified decorum of the legal system, that qualifies as a full facial!)

Re:The Kid Will Be Three Years Old Before Resoluti (Score:1) by Marc A. on 11:48 AM June 28th, 2006 EST (#2) Yeah, I agree. The requirement that he prove his fitness before having access to his child is just another layer of misandry. Also, even though I do see this case as a victory, I posted and sent it around more in terms of outrage at feminist judge S. Patricia Spear. It's just confirming of many of the reports we get from men about how a number of these judges are. Yes I'm very happy the appellate court ripped up Judge S. Patricia Spear's reactionism and bigotry, but my main reaction is anger at this judge. NCFM-LA is submitting this case to the Commission on Judicial Performance and requesting that feminist Judge S. Patricia Spear be disciplined or removed.

Re:The Kid Will Be Three Years Old Before Resoluti (Score:2) by Roy on 08:58 PM June 28th, 2006 EST (#3) It's always nice when justice can be pursued... and the billable hours are infinite, yes? "Justice" has become a racketeering industry, better than anything the Mafia ever imagined back in the boot-legging, prostitution, gambling shoot-em-up eras... Too bad the old gangsters missed the opportunity for real easy money. Oh, wait a minute --- All their sons and grandsons are in Congress now! Those old guys were real smart, and knew how to finesse a con-job. They decided to call it "democracy" after much private discussion.

[an error occurred while processing this directive]