[an error occurred while processing this directive]
Woman gets ASBO after terror campaign
posted by Matt on 09:08 AM May 18th, 2006
Inequality AngryMan writes "A 57 year old woman has been convicted of waging a hate campaign against her neighbours for more than a year. The court has given her an Anti-Social Behaviour Order, a kind of injunction which means she is banned from doing certain things. What would a man have got in the same circumstances? Almost certainly jail time. This woman is a psychopath who has apparently shown no concern about her actions."

Woman Pulls Off Husband's Genitals, MAY Face Charges | McCartney May Lose $390 Million in Divorce  >

  
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
If it were a Man? (Score:1)
by Davidadelong on 09:40 AM May 18th, 2006 EST (#1)
I am sure that if it were a Man, and anyone that he harrassed was a Woman, he would be locked up in a mental hospital until he was sufficiently doped into submission. We can't have any females being scared by a big bad Man now can we? But, it is perfectly alright for a deranged Woman to terrorize her neighbors, and blame it on her personality, geez! Talk about double standards!
Re:If it were a Man? (Score:1)
by RandomMan on 10:40 AM May 18th, 2006 EST (#2)
Miss Wilding had been arrested more than 30 times in the past two years.

Danielle Graham, representing Miss Wilding, said her client had spent more time with security guards and court officials than her family, and added much of what had been said in court was opinion.

She said: "Can you really apply an anti-social behaviour order in order to change someone's personality?"


No, you can't. That's why society puts pure sociopaths who've been arrested 30 times in prison, or locked psychiatric wards, to protect others. She'll have to kill or injure a woman or child (i.e. a person of actual social value in the feminist judge's eyes) before that happens. Still, an "ASBO" is a step in the right direction. If a man were doing this, he'd be in a psychiatric facility for evaluation, because men who act this way are "dangerous" while women who do precisely the same things are "crazy". We can thank 40 years of feminist victim-politics and misandry for this one. Hope her neighbours appreciate it.
Follows typical law enforcement moduc operandi (Score:1)
by MR on 04:31 PM May 18th, 2006 EST (#3)
Follows typical law enforcement modus operandi (prejudice/misandry):

# Male criminals are evil and need punishment and prison.

# Female criminals are distrubed and need care and special sevices.

[an error occurred while processing this directive]