[an error occurred while processing this directive]
RADAR Alert: Protect Our Children, Tell Congress to Hold VAWA Hearings Now
posted by Matt on 07:37 PM April 24th, 2006
RADAR Project Each year the parents of 1 million American children get a divorce.

In an estimated one-third of divorces, an allegation of domestic violence is made, often in the form of a restraining order. These restraining orders have become so widespread that they are referred to as “silver bullets,” “slam-dunks,” or simply, “divorce planning.”

In half of all restraining orders, there is not even an allegation of violence. (http://www.mediaradar.org/docs/VAWA-Restraining-Orders.pdf) Even in those orders that do allege violence, often the person who requested the order was mutually involved, the dispute was minor, or the allegation of violence was flat-out false. So it is estimated that 80% or more of DV allegations represent trumped-up and even malicious claims of domestic “violence.”

Click "Read more..." for more.


Protect Our Children, Tell Congress to Hold VAWA Hearings Now

In 85% of divorces, custody is awarded to the mother, thus depriving the children of contact from their father.

That means each year, false claims of domestic violence contribute to over 200,000 children losing daily contact with their father. That's about 550 children each and every day. And that's a huge tragedy for our children and for our nation.

This spring, 25 organizations from across the country banded together and signed on to a Resolution to counter the negative impact of VAWA. The Resolution is shown at the end of this Alert.

We are requesting that Congress hold hearings on the massive civil rights violations that are happening each and every day, as a direct result of VAWA-funded programs.

This Alert is the last call for our VAWA Spring Campaign. This is it. Please contact your Representative and two Senators with this very simple message:

WE WANT CONGRESS TO CONDUCT HEARINGS ON THE MASSIVE CIVIL RIGHTS ABUSES OF VAWA. AND WE WANT THE HEARINGS NOW.

Please make a telephone call to the Legislative Aide who deals with judicial or family issues. Or better yet, fax a copy a copy of the Resolution to your elected official.

Please do it now, for a better future, for our children.


RESOLUTION
Regarding the Violence Against Women Act

  1. Whereas, in 2000 Senator Orrin Hatch directed the executive branch to “ensure that men who have been victimized by domestic violence and sexual assault will receive benefits and services under the Act” 1
  2. Whereas, despite that statement of Congressional intent, male victims continue to be turned away from VAWA-funded shelters. 2
  3. Whereas, the language of the 2005 Violence Against Women Act now recognizes that male victims of domestic violence are in need of treatment and protection, and requires VAWA-funded programs to provide them with such services. 3
  4. Whereas, VAWA funds judicial education programs that instruct judges to disregard constitutionally-protected due process provisions, 4
  5. Whereas, judges often issue restraining orders without any direct threat of harm, 5, 6 and restraining orders are widely used as “part of the gamesmanship of divorce.” 7, 8
  6. Whereas, the Massachusetts Trial Court found that less than half of all restraining orders issued in that state involved even an allegation of physical violence, 9
  7. Whereas, it has been estimated that each year one million protective orders are issued in the United States, and about 500,000 of such orders represent a direct violation of due process protections, 10, 11
  8. Whereas, 15% of such protective orders are issued against women and 85% against men. 12
  9. Whereas, research shows that most instances of partner aggression are minor in nature, 13 and such cases require counseling, not legal intervention,
  10. Whereas, VAWA-funded programs and policies often discourage couple counseling and partner reconciliation, and
  11. Whereas, various VAWA incentives serve to promote family break-up, 14 which results in children losing daily contact with one of their parents. 15

Therefore, the undersigned organizations request that:

  1. The VAWA appropriation bill for FY2007 include report language directing the DoJ Violence Against Women Office to provide Congress, no later than December 30, 2007, with client utilization statistics of VAWA-funded programs and services, in compliance with the male-inclusive requirements of Section 40002(b)(8) of the 2005 Violence Against Women Act.
  2. The Senate and House Appropriations Committees support and approve President Bush’s budget request to fund the Violence Against Women Act at the $347 million level in FY2007.
  3. The United States Congress establish a panel to investigate the claims that the Violence Against Women Act promotes the excessive issuance of restraining orders, which often leads to family break-up and inappropriate loss of parent involvement.

Signed:

Michael J. Geanoulis
RADAR: Respecting Accuracy in Domestic Abuse Reporting
Mike East
FATHERS: Fathers Asking to Have Equal Rights
Gary Gagnon
National Congress of Fathers and Children – New Hampshire
David R. Usher
ACFC – Missouri Coalition
Dan Hogan
Fathers and Families
Pastor Kenneth Deemer
Shattered Men
Alan Rusmisel
Alabama Coalition of Fathers and Children
D'Arcy L. McGreer
Fathers for Virginia
Lee Newman
Stop Abuse for Everyone, NH Chapter
Michael McCormick
American Coalition for Fathers and Children
Jamil Jabr
Fathers-4-Justice
Philip Cook
Stop Abuse for Everyone
Tom Smith
American Union for Men
Richar’ Farr
Krights Radio
Lisa Scott
TABS: Taking Action Against Bias in the System
James Hays
Coalition of Fathers and Families NY, Inc.
Harry Crouch
Men’s Advocacy Network
Terri Lynn Tersak
True-Equality.org
Paul Clements
Dads Against Divorce Discrimination-NH
Jeffrey W. Dick
MensCustodyShelterNetwork.com
Gregory Romeo
Tulsa Area Fathers Rights Association
James Semerad
Dads and Moms of Michigan
Marc Snider
NHCustody.org
 
Michael Burns
Dialogue on Sustainable Community
Marc Angelucci
National Coalition of Free Men, Los Angeles Chapter
 


1 Congressional Record, October 11, 2000, pp. S10191-92.

2 RADAR. VAWA Programs discriminate against male victims. Rockville, MD: Respecting Accuracy in Domestic Abuse Reporting, 2006. www.mediaradar.org

3 Violence Against Women Act, Section 40002(b)(8).

4 Bleemer R: N.J. judges told to ignore rights in abuse TROs. New Jersey Law Journal April 24, 1995.

5 David Heleniak. The new Star Chamber: The New Jersey family court and the prevention of Domestic Violence Act. Rutgers Law Review , Spring 2005.

6 Wendy McElroy. Abuse of temporary restraining orders endangers real victims. FoxNews.com , December 27, 2005.

7 Thomas Kasper. Obtaining and defending against an order of protection. Illinois Bar Journal   June 2005.

8 Thomas Kiernan. Re: False Claims. New Jersey Law Journal , April 21, 1988 Vol. 121 p. 6.

9 Office of the Commissioner of Probation, Massachusetts Trial Court: The tragedies of domestic violence: A qualitative analysis of civil restraining orders. October 12, 1995.

10 Dorothy Carl Quinn. Ex parte protection orders: Is due process locked out? Temple Law Quarterly Vol. 58, Winter 1985.

11 RADAR. VAWA: Threat to families, children, men, and women. Rockville, MD: Respecting Accuracy in Domestic Abuse Reporting, 2006. www.mediaradar.org .

12 Cathy Young. Domestic violence: An in-depth analysis. Washington, DC: Independent Women’s Forum, 2005.

13 Linda Kelly. Disabusing the definition of domestic abuse. Florida State University Law Review Vol. 30, 2003.

14 Phyllis Schlafly. Federal incentives make children fatherless, Human Events Online , May 11, 2005.

15 Stephen Baskerville. Violence against families: Fathers fall victim to domestic-abuse laws. American Conservative , August 29, 2005, pp. 23-25.


Date of RADAR Release: April 21, 2006

R.A.D.A.R. – Respecting Accuracy in Domestic Abuse Reporting – is a network of concerned men and women working to assure that the problem of domestic violence is treated in a balanced and effective manner. http://www.mediaradar.org/.

Teen Launches Web Site for Children of Divorce | Document on Indian Dowry Law Misuse  >

  
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
RADAR ... Earth to RADAR? (Score:2)
by Roy on 07:57 PM April 24th, 2006 EST (#1)
OK.

Your principles are excellent.

Your blog blurbs are eloquent.

Do you have EVEN ONE United States Senator or Representative who has joined your cause, your "organization," your proposed program?

Because if you have no inside connection to the Congressional/D.C. Mafia, you are merely posting virtual bumper stickers and wasting a lot of energy and good will.

RADAR --- what pol can you deliver?


Re:RADAR ... Earth to RADAR? (Score:1)
by brotherskeeper on 09:45 PM April 24th, 2006 EST (#2)
Roy,

What would constitute a more successful approach? Focusing on individual pols? If so, which ones?

This isn't a rhetorical challenge. I'm very interested.

As you say, RADAR has done excellent issues-based research.
Re:RADAR ... Earth to RADAR? (Score:1)
by Gregory on 10:34 PM April 24th, 2006 EST (#3)
Wasn't it men's and fathers' rights groups that applied pressure to the pols and got congress to add male-inclusive language to VAWA? That's at least some progress. I think slow and steady is the way to go, even though it's frustrating at times.
Re:RADAR ... Earth to RADAR? (Score:1)
by MR on 02:10 AM April 25th, 2006 EST (#4)
I'm fully with RADAR on all these alerts. I have a Rep and two Senators, and I plan on FAXing all of their offices (D.C. and at home), then snail mailing them the letters. I'm also sending them the Resolution from RADAR.

IMO, all that's necessary for evil VAWA not to prosper is for good people to keep on doing things like RADAR has proposed. The more the better.

Personally, I'm saddened to see RADAR ending this most recent phase of their activism, because it just makes me feel really good to be letting people know about the evils of VAWA. I don't plan on stopping even if I'm the only person speaking out.
Re:RADAR ... Earth to RADAR? (Score:1)
by Hunchback on 08:36 PM April 25th, 2006 EST (#7)
Steady, yes, but slow? We cannot afford to go slow. As more and more injury is done to our children, if it takes us another half-generation to get going we will have lost. The damaged goods that our boys and young men are becoming will be in no shape to carry on the fight if we fail them. Our activism has a definite expiration date.

Re:RADAR ... MRA's Need to Purchase One Pol (Score:2)
by Roy on 09:28 PM April 25th, 2006 EST (#8)
This is really not that complicated.

RADAR is right on every issue, every principle, and they are heroic. No question.

MRA's need to anti-up and buy a politician inside the beltway to represent the cause.

Nothing else will matter as much as having a pol with an elected office speaking for MRA's.

I wish I knew which one among the hundreds in the Senate and House might be accessible.

The VAWA 2005 vote made me vomit.

Not ONE dissenting vote?

My criticism is not in any way a cynical dismissal of RADAR's importance....

RADAR is like a D.C. wanna-be lobby with no bank.

My strategic advice is to target one politician who's already got the power of office.

Some one with real research skills could pull this name up in a week-end.

Forget about Hillary.


This site is read by many! (Score:1)
by Davidadelong on 09:56 AM April 25th, 2006 EST (#5)
I posted a problem I was having with a wrongful death suit in Claveras Cty. CA. I know that the Attorney for the Cty. in this case read my post, as well as Cty. members. My point is simple, Radar is doing a "fine" job of getting information "out there". I was told that the Cty. didn't like what I said on the "world wide web". Perhaps Radar should document the politicians that it has contacted and received negative, or no responses? That would be educational for their constituents that are concerned with Equality, don't you think?
Wish I could, but... (Score:1)
by Pietatoes on 05:19 PM April 25th, 2006 EST (#6)
I live in NY, and...
*chuckles at the thought of Hitlery voting against VAWA*

---
Every
American deserves the
Right
To be
Human
Re:Wish I could, but... (Score:2)
by Roy on 10:14 PM April 25th, 2006 EST (#9)
Hitlary will do whatever it takes to make a good aggressive run on being the first female Prezodent.

She will endorse men's rights if necessary.

You can recognize a vampire when you see one, right?

They tend to dissemble....


[an error occurred while processing this directive]