[an error occurred while processing this directive]
RADAR Alert: PBS Whitewashes Flawed Documentary
posted by Matt on 02:25 AM December 21st, 2005
RADAR Project After a month-long review, the Public Broadcasting Service has disappointed thousands of viewers and given its stamp of approval to Breaking the Silence: Children's Stories.

According to the PBS statement, “The producers approached the topic with the open mindedness and commitment to fairness that we require of our journalists. Their research was extensive and supports the conclusions drawn in the program.”

Click "Read more..." for more.


PBS Whitewashes Flawed Documentary

PBS plans to produce a follow-up documentary on child custody, family courts, and parental alienation syndrome, to be aired in Spring 2006. PBS does not indicate that the second program will highlight the concerns or perspectives of fathers; indeed, the PBS statement does not even include the word, “father.”

Of greater concern is the PBS statement that says, “Additionally, the documentary's ‘first-person story telling approach’ did not allow the depth of the producers' research to be as evident to the viewer as it could have been.” [emphasis added]. RADAR is concerned that in Breaking the Silence Part II, PBS will simply present biased experts and one-sided research that will reinforce the propaganda-like conclusions contained in Breaking the Silence Part I.

The PBS statement made no concession to Ken Bode, ombudsman for the Corporation for Public Broadcasting, who wrote on Monday, “It was precisely the lack of balance and fairness that caused so many viewers to contact PBS and CPB ... Lasseur now says that [lack of balance] was intentional. Simply put, that amounts to a plea of guilty to violating the fairness and balance standards of PBS.” [http://www.cpb.org/ombudsmen/051219bode.html]

The PBS statement also ignored the criticisms by PBS' own ombudsman, Michael Getler, who wrote on December 2 that the program comes across “as a one-sided, advocacy program” and “there was no recognition of opposing views.” [http://www.pbs.org/ombudsman/2005/12/introduction_and_breaking_the_silence.html]

On December 12, RADAR sent a letter to the Corporation for Public Broadcasting calling for an Inspector General investigation of the program. The letter reiterated RADAR's demands that PBS completely retract Breaking the Silence, and that PBS commission a follow-up documentary that highlights the plight of children endangered by a court system that awards custody to fathers only 15% of the time. [http://www.mediaradar.org/docs/RADAR_letterToCPB_InspectorGeneral.pdf]

A recent column by David Usher reveals how Breaking the Silence is part of a broader campaign to influence public policy that would make it far more difficult for divorcing fathers to gain shared parenting rights of their children. [http://www.therealitycheck.org/GuestColumnist/dusher121905.htm]

RADAR will analyze the situation over the upcoming holidays and issue our next Alert on January 2, 2006.


PBS Programming Statement on BREAKING THE SILENCE: CHILDREN'S STORIES

BREAKING THE SILENCE: CHILDREN'S STORIES chronicles the impact of domestic violence on children and the recurring failings of family courts across the country to protect them from their abusers. In stark and often poignant interviews, children and battered mothers tell their stories of abuse at home and continued trauma within the courts. The producers approached the topic with the open mindedness and commitment to fairness that we require of our journalists. Their research was extensive and supports the conclusions drawn in the program. Funding from the Mary Kay Ash Charitable Foundation met PBS's underwriting guidelines; the Foundation had no editorial influence on program content.

However, the program would have benefited from more in-depth treatment of the complex issues surrounding child custody and the role of family courts and most specifically the provocative topic of Parental Alienation Syndrome (PAS). Additionally, the documentary's "first-person story telling approach" did not allow the depth of the producers' research to be as evident to the viewer as it could have been.

PBS has received a substantial body of analysis and documentation from both supporters of the documentary and its critics.

It is clear to us that this complex and important issue would benefit from further examination. To that end, PBS will commission an hour-long documentary for that purpose. Plans call for the documentary to be produced and broadcast in Spring 2006. We expect that the hour-long treatment of the subject will allow ample opportunity for doctors, psychologists, judges, parent advocates and victims of abuse to have their perspectives shared, challenged and debated.


Date of RADAR Release: December 20, 2005

R.A.D.A.R. – Respecting Accuracy in Domestic Abuse Reporting – is a network of concerned men and women working to assure that the problem of domestic violence is treated in a balanced and effective manner: http://www.mediaradar.org/.

More from the Women-as-Far-More-Valuable Department | Indian Policewomen Assault Couples for Dating  >

  
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
PBS Pisses on Half of the Human Race (Score:1)
by Fidelbogen on 04:17 AM December 21st, 2005 EST (#1)
I am stunned. Truly stunned. Utterly at a loss for words. This is slap in the face, truly a slap in the face. I could almost call it a declaration of war.....

Somebody needs to.....feel the heat for this.


"Feminism has a rap sheet."

Re:PBS Pisses on Half of the Human Race (Score:1)
by Marc A. on 11:30 AM December 21st, 2005 EST (#3)
Yeah, I have no respect for PBS whatsoever anymore. This bare "report" appears to have been written by their lawyers in as evasive a manner as possible in an effort to avoid responsibility and cover up what they really did. But the cat is out of the bag. PBS is being watched, and it's not over. There is more to come. What we've done here as a movement is unprecedented. We need to keep fighting and never stop.
Re:PBS Pisses on Half of the Human Race (Score:1)
by RandomMan on 11:52 AM December 21st, 2005 EST (#4)
Are any of you genuinely surprised by this outcome? Haven't you learned yet that "Public" or "Family" in the name of a government body or agency means "Women", and that women (even the non-feminists) have been trained to believe that it's their God-given right to be pandered to at every moment of their pampered lives?

I, for one, am just surprised that the ombudsman had the balls to say anything in the first place, or to recognize that men had anything to say at all. How very un-feminist and politically incorrect of him. You can bet he won't be getting hired by any government agency anytime soon.

As for PBS, may their funding shrivel up and die as as result of their open bigotry. They are a lost cause.
Re:PBS Pisses on Half of the Human Race (Score:1)
by Thundercloud on 12:26 PM December 21st, 2005 EST (#5)
"Surprised"? Hardly.

You know there is a movement a foot by some republicans and independents to cut off PBS's public funding. I was against it earlier, but am completely FOR it now.
I do NOT want my tax dollars going to support a left-wing (and yes it IS left wing, sorry)propaganda machine who's soul purpose is to mis-inform (INTENIONALY), and participate in social engineering.

I say cut off their funding NOW, unless they comply and air programming that is BALANCED and DOESN'T push one political agenda or the other on us. If they WANT to martyr liberal causes, including feminism's that's fine, then let them PAY FOR IT THEMSELVES!
I have enough aggravation...

And as always, for anyone who is thinking of hollering at me for criticizing "liberals" (in this case) please do not bother calling me a "right winger", I am not. I am an independent, and if there was a publicly funded network that twisted the truth and pushed propaganda on the right wing of the aisle, I'd be riding them JUST as hard. Okay? Okay.

  Thundercloud.
  "Hoka hey!"
Re: PBS Pisses... Exemplary Propaganda? (Score:2)
by Roy on 08:24 PM December 21st, 2005 EST (#8)
PBS' communique stated --- "The producers approached the topic with the open mindedness and commitment to fairness that we require of our journalists."

Actually, there was nothing remotely journalistic about this program ... rather, it was pure unadulterated propaganda.

Real journalists have to commit to a code of ethics.

Even student journalists have to agree to higher standards than what PBS alleges its producers and their overseers demonstrated.

I know first-hand because my daughter just got accepted to Medill School of Journalism at Northwestern U., and they make you sign an "Honor Pledge" before you can show up for the first day of classes.

Among many commitments, students must agree that they will NOT:

- fabricate information, data, or other material

"Fabrication consists of the intentional falsification or invention of information, data, quotations or sources in an academic exercise or in a journalism presentation. Fabrication also includes, but is not limited to, mis-attributing information ...

Maybe it's time to require that PBS commit to an HONOR PLEDGE that meets the minimum standards of a freshman college journalism student?


Re: PBS Pisses... Exemplary Propaganda? (Score:1)
by Thundercloud on 01:01 PM December 22nd, 2005 EST (#10)
They pledge not to fabricate information?

I thought they pledged TO fabricate information, in the media.
They do it all the time.
(Dan Rather, anyone?)

  Thundercloud.
  "Hoka hey!"
Equality? (Score:1)
by Davidadelong on 08:41 AM December 21st, 2005 EST (#2)
There is no reason why a Male can't be as good a parent as a Woman, none. If the courts were to do their job the way it is supposed to be done, we would have 50% custody in any divorce, or unwed birth. Both parents being required to reside in the same school district, and physical custody being six months out of the year for both Parents. If one of the parents gives up that right, then special arrangements could be made. It is about time that our system stopped using Children as tools of control over society. I am sick of it, and so are many others. If this fair and equal system was put in place, no child support at all folks, unless one of the Parents gave up the right of raising their children, how many unwanted births, and how many pre-arranged divorces would there be? Of course, there would be a back lash of a loss of jobs within the cottage industry that facillitates this sham, namely divorce lawyers, all those Man hating womyn in the dept of injustice, and all those social service people that suck our life blood in the form of our tax dollars. Oh well, there is always some acceptable losses due to progress! Just my opinion folks!
I used to support PBS. (Score:1)
by Wilf on 01:02 PM December 21st, 2005 EST (#6)
http://anticirc.blogspot.com
I used to support PBS, but this is the last straw. Now I hope that congress succeeds in dismantling it altogether.
Re:I used to support PBS. (Score:1)
by Thundercloud on 03:06 PM December 21st, 2005 EST (#7)
Like I said, earlier, I'm all for that.
In fact we ought to be writing to our congress men and INCOURAGEING them to dismantle PBS.

If PBS can't get their facts straight, they have NO BUISNESS using public money to pedal their B.S..

  Thundercloud.
  "Hoka hey!"
Surprised - WHY ! (Score:1)
by Gang-banged on 11:51 PM December 21st, 2005 EST (#9)
(User #1714 Info)
When was the last time anyone saw a Public Body apologise for anything ?

I seem to recall that they knew a considerable amount of complaint would follow the programme, and, had plans in place to sideline same.

Evidently, they seek to find a way of continuing to broadcast the programme (with repeats), and with or 'without' the offered, "Lets be seen to supply Balance programme."

Seems feminism has PBS by the balls, and their will rules all.
[an error occurred while processing this directive]