[an error occurred while processing this directive]
RADAR Alert: Despite Urgent Requests, PBS Releases "Breaking the Silence"
posted by Matt on 11:26 AM October 24th, 2005
RADAR Project Last week RADAR requested that PBS delay the release of Breaking the Silence: Children's Stories until it could be revised to reflect basic journalistic standards of accuracy and fairness. Ignoring the thousands of e-mails, phone calls, and letters, PBS went ahead and released the program anyway.

Click "Read more..." for more.


Despite Urgent Requests, PBS Releases "Breaking the Silence"

So the evening of October 20, a group of men gathered outside the headquarters of the Los Angeles PBS affiliate. Armed with signs and a bullhorn, they made it clear that a lot of people were very upset. This is their report:

"We just handed out RADAR's flyers to KCET (PBS) employees in Los Angeles as they entered and exited. We stood out there for two hours with signs. We got lots of honks from cars passing, including a bus driver. The best part was when the KCET van pulled up, bewildered and curious what we were about, and they took a flyer."

Breaking the Silence, which was funded by the Mary Kay Ash Foundation, has been widely criticized by editorialists and others:

* "Balance was sacrificed to the political agenda of the sponsors" (Mike McCormick)
* Reflects an "extremist point of view" (Ned Holstein)
* "Compromise of impartiality violates PBS's own code of ethics" (Mark Rosenthal)
* Promotes an "ideological dogma" (Dean Tong)
* Represents a "direct assault on American fathers" (Jeff Leving and Glenn Sacks)
* Program is "larded with Leftist fantasies and sweeping stereotypes" (Carey Roberts)

The most intensive campaign in the history of the American fatherhood movement is now underway. This effort is being waged at the local, state, and national levels. RADAR invites you to join this break-through campaign.

The foundation of PBS is the hundreds of affiliates around the nation. These affiliates rely heavily on local contributions and community support. So this week, we are asking you to contact your local affiliate. To find your local affiliate:

  1. Go to http://www.pbs.org/stationfinder/index.html and enter your zip code, or
  2. Look in your local telephone directory

Second, find out whether Breaking the Silence has already been aired, or if not, if the affiliate plans to air it.

Then telephone, e-mail, and/or write the Station Manager with this message:

"Please do not air Breaking the Silence until it can be revised to reflect basic journalistic standards of accuracy, fairness, and balance."

If you have a conversation with an employee, emphasize these two points:

  1. Disseminating false information about fathers will only hurt, not help abused children.
  2. Breaking the Silence does not conform to the CPB Code of Ethics which requires PBS to "give the appearance as well as the fact of such impartiality, devotion, and integrity." [http://www.cpb.org/aboutcpb/cpbethicsguide.pdf]

If the program has already been aired, ask the affiliate to not air it again.

Or take your effort to a higher level. Find a couple other people, print out some copies of RADAR's flyer (Word document), and pass it out in front of your local PBS office (please send a brief report to info-at-mediaradar.org and attach pictures if possible!). Don't make this too complicated - just get out there and have some fun!

Above all, do not come across as a "mad-dad" or send "poison-pen" letters. These only reinforce the worst stereotypes and hurt our cause. Always be polite and reasonable.

+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Date of RADAR Release: October 23, 2005

Respecting Accuracy in Domestic Abuse Reporting (RADAR) works to assure fairness and balance in the domestic violence issue: http://www.mediaradar.org/.

Female inmates increase but not at the same rate as male | Nationwide Comic Strip Promotes Warren Farrell Book  >

  
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
PBS (Score:0)
by Anonymous User on 12:47 PM October 24th, 2005 EST (#2)
Is anyone really surprised that despite the complaints and despite being shown the FACTS about DV, that PBS STILL aired this thing?
I'm not. They have an agenda and they can't let the facts get in the way of that agenda.
They are part of the main-stream media. The feminist cause is their cause as well.
Don't feel too bad, though guys. As an Indian activist I have written MANY media outlets about the plight of my people. I have complained to them COUNTLESS times about the lack of representation of American Indians in the news or entertainment veins of the media.
I have chastised them for reporting about poverty, starvation, police brutality, suicide, drug and alcohol abuse in some God forsaken country on the other side of the world, but they COMPLETELY ignore the SAME, if not worse problems facing people (on and off reservations)right HERE in the U.S.! The media constantly stereotypes Indians, if we are given any air time at all. (Which we usually aren't).
The media is so narrow sited they could look through a key hole with BOTH eyes.
Some say that the mainstream media is "Liberally biased". I don't know if that is true or not, But I can tell you for certain they are BIASED, PIRIOD.
Why they are so I can not explain. It seems very strange. Why would they literally report on life threatening issues facing one group of people, but COMPLETELY ignore (consistently) the life threatening issues of another group of people? Especially in America?
For instance I can count on one hand the number of 'prostate cancer' stories, reported in the news, but I can't even BEGIN to count the number of 'breast cancer' stories I see reported. That is bias plain and simple.

Any way, I don't know how much good it will do to write to these types of people in the media.
They do not CARE whether they get the facts straight or not, they are just concerned about being politically-correct, pushing an agenda and social engineering.
How do you fight that...?

  Thundercloud.
  "Hoka hey!"
Re:PBS (Score:0)
by Anonymous User on 04:02 PM October 24th, 2005 EST (#10)
("How do you fight that...?")

By writing them and telling them, out right that you will NOT support them financially or other wise until they do what the say they do (but don't) and that is report objectively.
Let them know that their agenda is going to COST them. That is what I am gonna do.

  Jinx
Public Donations (Score:2)
by frank h on 02:32 PM October 24th, 2005 EST (#6)
You know, most of the PBS stations I know of rely heavily on public donations and hold fundraising telethons multiple times per year. Given their scant viewership when compared to the networks, it probably wouldn't be hard to start an email campaign to campaign against them and measurably impact thier funding.

Just a thought.
Re:Public Donations (Score:0)
by Anonymous User on 03:12 PM October 24th, 2005 EST (#9)
I was thinkning along a similar line like protesting in front of local stations when they hold their fund raising campaigns, and at other key times.

Ray
Kudos to Mark R. and Others (Score:0)
by Anonymous User on 03:10 PM October 24th, 2005 EST (#8)
Friends & Colleagues:

Mark Rosenthal has been a major player who has debunked many of the feminist fallacies that have been used to promote gender feminist domestic violence propaganda.

Saturday, October 22, 2005
Breaking the Silence: Misleading Stories
by Mark B. Rosenthal

Breaking the Silence: Misleading Stories

He has worked tirelessly in our recent efforts to get a fairer, more gender inclusive VAWA.

Did Phil Hartman Die from Congressionally-Sanctioned Discrimination?
by Mark Rosenthal
06 July 2005

Did Phil Hartman Die from Congressionally-Sanctioned Discrimination?

Hats off to Mark whose keen wit and insight are invaluable assets in the ongoing struggle to make straight the insidiously twisted lies that gender feminists have foisted on the public consciousness. As Mark's work so eruditely shows, gender feminists have used self-selected samples in their advocacy research to transform misandrist junk science into terrible laws.

Let us hope Mark's work, and the work of others, totally derailed this latest gender feminists effort at PBS to vilify and further marginalize fathers.

Somehow, I fear we have not heard the last of the gender feminists on this or other issues negatively affecting fathers and/or men.

We can do no greater honor to those who are working to help us, than to continue to spread the word, and support their efforts in whatever way we can.

I am honored to be associated with all of you at this point in our nation's history, albeit a very difficult time.

Sincerely, Ray
beat you to the punch by 24 hours (Score:1)
by quetzal on 02:42 PM October 25th, 2005 EST (#15)
I called the local PBS in Tampa yesterday, and left them a message about the 1998 DOJ study, where it was found that 36% of domestic violence victims are men. (I'm sorry, I do not have the link to that study in front of me right now).
Forward, brothers!!!
--quetzal
Re:beat you to the punch by 24 hours (Score:0)
by Anonymous User on 03:13 PM October 25th, 2005 EST (#16)
Good, Quetzal. That's the thing to do.
Have you received a reply, yet?

  Thundercloud.
  "Hoka hey!"
Re:beat you to the punch by 24 hours (Score:1)
by quetzal on 01:17 PM October 27th, 2005 EST (#18)
Not yet Thunderbird, I figure on waiting a few more days, even if they do respond..
Sorry about that ThunderCLOUD (Score:1)
by quetzal on 01:19 PM October 27th, 2005 EST (#19)
I ain't seein' too good today am I?
--quetzal
Re:beat you to the punch by 24 hours (Score:0)
by Anonymous User on 10:49 AM October 26th, 2005 EST (#17)
Here's an excellent source explaining that study, A Re-Examination of National Violence Against Women Survey Data on Type of Assault by an Intimate

Here's another good source Feibert Bibliography at MenWeb

It's too bad the "educated," elitist, intellectual dummies at PBS don't do a little basic research. It very much appears that prejudice is a guiding "principle" of those Prejudiced Bigoted Scoundrels.

Ray
Re:Repeal the 19th (Score:0)
by Anonymous User on 01:13 PM October 24th, 2005 EST (#3)
Can we try and ban this IP please? I knwo there are ways round this with DHCP and other methods, but even a domain?

Even better, can an admin run an iplookup for the domain?

I'm pretty sure it will resolve to a university
Re:Repeal the 19th (Score:0)
by Anonymous User on 01:19 PM October 24th, 2005 EST (#4)
You don't like what is said and thus wish to cencor. Typical feminist.
WOO HOO! (Score:2)
by Clancy (long_ponytail@yahoo.com) on 10:22 AM October 25th, 2005 EST (#12)
God, you are funny. You've got to be a laid off Seinfeld writer. Just one question, what the hell does CENCOR mean? You'd be surprised at how many on-line dictionaries are out there. Would ya tell me the one about the 19th amMendment just ONE MORE TIME??? PuLEEEEEEEEEEZZZZZZZZZE?????
Re:Repeal the 19th (Score:1)
by dschmidt on 01:38 PM October 24th, 2005 EST (#5)
Or, those with mod-points can just mod the posts troll or flamebait. Then, they aren't displayed by default.
Re:Repeal the 19th (Score:1)
by robrob on 12:03 PM October 25th, 2005 EST (#13)
That's true. But sometimes I feel trolls have to be banned because as in this case, they're not simply bored or trying to wind people up, they're trying to discredit the board.

I'm not keen that future searches of this website will show posters asking for women to be killed (even though we know there's a 99% chance it's a female women's studies student that's posting these messages here).
Re:Repeal the 19th (Score:1)
by Acksiom on 03:10 PM October 24th, 2005 EST (#7)
Shoo, troll. Shoo.
Icky old troll. Yuck.

Ack!
Non Illegitimi Carborundum, and KOT!
Re:Repeal the 19th (Score:0)
by Anonymous User on 09:55 AM October 25th, 2005 EST (#11)
Whoever is writing these blurbs about the 19th amendment is probably a feminist, not a men’s rights activist.

They are employing a fairly simple strategy, “guerrilla tactics”. Basically, this individual is attempting to imply that repealing the right to vote is actually a goal of the men’s rights movement. This is totally bogus. By implying these goals, the individual is transparently attempting to marginalize the movement.

How? By making the men’s movement seem very extreme, nobody will take it seriously and many will ignore its legitimate goals: fairness in the family courts, end to preferential treatment of women in the work force (“affirmative action”; that is, discrimination against middle class men in the work force), end of insulting and derogatory images of men in the media and entertainment industry, end to anti-boy policies in the schools, the defeat of feminism, etc.

I’ve NEVER heard anybody seriously advocate eliminating women’s right to vote. Don’t fall for it folks!!!

Re:Repeal the 19th (Score:0)
by Anonymous User on 01:25 PM October 25th, 2005 EST (#14)
>"Don't fall for it folks!!!"

Don't worry the majority of us here are smart enough NOT to fall for it. :-)

  Thundercloud.
  "Hoka hey!"
[an error occurred while processing this directive]