[an error occurred while processing this directive]
Sex, Father Both Optional
posted by Matt on 08:08 AM September 25th, 2005
Fatherhood MANN received a submission from Evil White Male Oppressor pointing out this story entitled "Women bypass sex in favour of 'instant pregnancies'" from the BBC website. Side-linked from it was this one entitled "Doctors may disregard 'need for a father' when deciding on IVF". From that story I followed this one entitled "Ban on sex selection could be lifted".

See a pattern forming here?

Click "Read more..." for more.


He mentioned that it seemed a lot of these stories were coming from England and we should look to them as warnings of things to come here in the US. Sort of reminds me of Orwell's 1984 and how it was set in England, too. But a trend toward factory-like pro-single-parent production of new people scares me even more than the notion of a Big Brother state. Two such scenarios at the same time is almost unthinkable, but then again, so were two Category 5 hurricanes in the Gulf of Mexico within a month of each other -- and unfortunately, that did happen.

Misandry alive and well at new web site | RADAR Alert: Mr. Biden, We’re Not Done with You Yet!  >

  
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
The Sex Mall Is Becoming a Real Circus (Score:0)
by Anonymous User on 10:44 AM September 25th, 2005 EST (#1)
All three articles shed fascinating light on a common theme -- the commodification of human reproduction.

Yuppie couples too busy for actual sex prefer in vitro fertilization for its convenience and efficiency, while lesbians want IVF because it's their inalienable "right" to add fatherless kids to their post-modern families.

Scientists want to implant human embryos into animals in order to advance stem-cell research.

Lawyers anticipate big bucks when broken-up couples go to court over who has the custody of frozen embryos.

Selecting the sex of your children is expected to become as common as picking out the color of your handbag.

Let's face it --- sex is just a business, and the really big money will not be in pornography in the future --- it will be in the commercialization of human reproduction and all the "designer options" that will be marketed as lifestyle choices.

Eventually there will be a Eugenics department at Wal-Mart... bet on it.

(roy)


View (Score:1)
by Baniadam on 03:58 PM September 25th, 2005 EST (#2)
"Mothers might be working or their children sleep in their bed. I told one of my patients who is going through IVF that another IVF patient had just conceived naturally. She said: 'What? She's having sex? Bloody Luddite'."


This is sums it up perfectly. I think they should ban bloody IVF. It’s disgusting. If anyone is too busy chasing their careers then they should pay the price. Heck what happens to the baby after he/she is born: does it get looked after by the mother or some nurse. Should only be used on couples with actual fertility problems.

Selecting your babies Gender.. What the Heck? What possible advantages can it have? (Gods) Nature has a way of balancing out. Only humans can manage to screw themselves over.

Another thing it is men that keep this thing going: Why the heck do they give sperm donations.. sick deluded men.


donations (Score:1)
by unrulypassenger on 11:37 AM November 22nd, 2005 EST (#6)
BECAUSE.
  Because they get to jack off to pics of bimbos and get paid for the privilege and what would have ended up in a toilet or shorts or running down ones leg. they gie you a check for. DUH get over it. There's already enough sperm in banks to re-populate the world. We HAVE to get over this envy of women's uteruses. Be happy with what we have. I wish men could have their own babies, too, but it aint gonna happen and you REALLY wouldnt step up to the plate for that one anyway. Dont kid yourself.
Seti finds shit... know why? (Score:2)
by ArtflDgr on 08:14 PM September 25th, 2005 EST (#3)
I was just sitting and reading and thinking... and it dawned on me why SETI has found nothing. zip, nada...

you see, a species develops... it evolves... till it has something higher than whatever the fuck happens happens... its called police... once there is police, then the physically disenfranchised try to balance a score that was never out of balance in the first place (the books were never level to start with).

eventually feminism comes right after police.. revisionist history... loss of all those memes from the past...you know... like how to raise a kid..
crime shoots up.. (single parent homes), desease shoots up (women having so much liberating sex), men stop working (why bother? you only need to support yourself), on and on...

then, blip.. were gone... damn.. only 200 years of "superior" culture built on top of 10,000 years of superior family structure, on top of 200k years of speciation... gone.. in less than 100 years..

all because

women dont want to be women!!!!

that they hate themselves so much that they hate what the world has in store from them from their conception.... i cant imagine such deep inner self loathing.


Re:Seti finds shit... know why? (Score:1)
by johnnyp on 06:17 AM September 26th, 2005 EST (#5)
Interesting hypothesis – we are evolving our selves into extinction.
Bad? (Score:0)
by Anonymous User on 01:17 AM September 26th, 2005 EST (#4)

I'm not sure this is all bad.

The crazier we are allowed to be, the easier it is to pick out the crazies.

Only the strong survive. Let the crazies kill themselves or make themselves miserable being crazy.

Long live the freedom to be crazy!


[an error occurred while processing this directive]