|
This discussion has been archived.
No new comments can be posted.
|
 |
|
|
|
by Anonymous User on 04:59 AM September 25th, 2005 EST (#1)
|
|
|
|
|
They have a "Contact Us" page you know. *wink*
The ludicrous nature of this site (only men cheat - never women) would be laughable were it not so serious for the men shown on it. What is the legal situation with these sites? I know in the UK, there has been some precedent but I can't remember what it was other than the offending site had to remove someone from it and pay damages.
The other thing is that it is a one way vehicle for every scorned, jilted, insecure, needy and bitter female to slander a male. One actual example from the site:
"If you are with him and feel you are in the wrong all the time you are not! Get out now! While you still have your vibrancy entacked. (sic) I didnt know what was happening to me untill I was reduced to the state of an invisible frightened child."
Aside from the usual confusing dichotomy - "equal to men/women are strong" and at the same time, able to be reduced to the "state of a frightened invisible child", this is one side of the story.
His description of her might well read:
Nervous, insecure, pathologically depressive, glass "half empty" type of person, low self esteem - no matter how I tried to cheer her up, it was never enough.
We'll never know though, eh? 'Cos only men cheat or mentally abuse.
Rob
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
by Underage on 10:09 AM September 25th, 2005 EST (#2)
|
|
|
|
|
This is the stupidest thing I have ever heard of. They're just making it seem that only men cheat. I don't believe in revenge, but someone should make a site called, "Dontdateherguy.com".
Actually no, no one should make that site because most guys aren't dumb enough to do so.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
by Anonymous User on 11:00 AM September 25th, 2005 EST (#3)
|
|
|
|
|
If you read the silly site's "advice" column, it's all about how women lie to each other.
One example talks about how a woman who wants to steal her girlfriend's guy will make up a tale about him cheating just to break them up.
If you scratch just under the surface of this site, it's really about how women do not trust other women.
He's gotta cheat with some bitch, right?
And she just might be your best friend!
How come they don't post the bitches photos?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
by Anonymous User on 06:47 PM September 25th, 2005 EST (#5)
|
|
|
|
|
but http://www.manhaters.com/ has an active forum. These are all basically all the really trashy extra loser women, sluts and whores. Wretched personalities every one. Every young single guy should lurk on one of these forums (for a little while) to learn the warning signs of psychotic women.
The common trait I see is the notion that once they sleep with a guy, they think they own him, and are entitled to all the details of the guys life.
All that says nothing of their choice of men...
Also reading a little while reveals... One woman with children from three different men is concerned about "her mans" (her words not mine) porn viewing. I mean wtf? She is lucky any man will have her, IMO
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
by canaryguy
(nospam.canaryguy@nospam.stealthfool.com)
on 08:09 PM September 25th, 2005 EST (#7)
|
|
|
|
|
The common trait I see is the notion that once they sleep with a guy, they think they own him, and are entitled to all the details of the guys life.
That's what I call "The Sex Gambit". Here's how I've seen women play it. (against myself included)
1. Sleep him with inappropriately early -- 2nd date or earlier.
2. Establish relationship, defining most of the terms to your liking.
3. If he bolts early then he's a no good so-and-so and he was using you for sex... cue self-righteous rage...
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
by Anonymous User on 11:42 AM September 25th, 2005 EST (#4)
|
|
|
|
|
A website that indicates cheating women, women who use false claims of victimhood to punish or gain advantage in todays sexist courts. women who use false lawsuits and paternity fraud. women who steal resources from men for personal gain.
Also, a website that reports of reporters/media who use feminist based slander to bias articles on all gender matters would be good too.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
by Anonymous User on 11:48 PM September 25th, 2005 EST (#8)
|
|
|
|
|
|
"Also, a website that reports of reporters/media who use feminist based slander to bias articles on all gender matters would be good too."
This sounds like an idea I've been contemplating for quite some time. This.... proposed website (as above), should operate in conjunction with a highly motivated network of cyber-MRAs who could be counted on to fire off e-mails massively and regularly to the various offending parties, and to spread the word to others by any means at their disposal .
That reminds me: The women's magazine "Redbook" currently has an article about "the sex secrets of men", in which the author compares men to...dogs. (Written in a light, witty, bantering tone along with an assurance that "we love them (men) anyway".)
I was not amused. I consider that brand of humor to be in very poor taste -- it was perhaps mildly funny for about 6 months during the 1980s, but has outlived its sell-by date and deserves zero tolerance in the present atmosphere of worsening gender relations.
Maybe somebody would like to look up that article in Redbook, get the contact info, and then maybe nudge those people in the right direction with an appropriate communique? I'll certainly be doing this myself.
-Fidelbogen-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
by Anonymous User on 11:00 AM September 26th, 2005 EST (#17)
|
|
|
|
|
>"One should be started for men"
Just what I was thinking. What's good for the goose...,
Thundercloud.
"Hoka hey!"
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
I'll write it. Any other people with development experience want in on it? We'll need project managers and such.
If someone wants to start a business out of it, let me know because I am just going to start mimicing their site in ASP right away.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
by ArtflDgr on 08:03 PM September 25th, 2005 EST (#6)
|
|
|
|
|
Given womens proclivities at lying and such... there will sure be a few lawsuits eventually...
you also know that there soon will be reverse equivalents...
skanksRus
should be interesting...
though i think the first liability lawsuit will kill the whole thing
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
by Anonymous User on 03:46 AM September 26th, 2005 EST (#11)
|
|
|
|
|
it must really get your panties in a bunch that "whiner" and "cry baby" have been so overused that no one gives a shit anymore. You're going to have to come up with original material. What a concept.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
by Anonymous User on 11:10 AM September 26th, 2005 EST (#18)
|
|
|
|
|
Yeah, it's funny, isn't it. When women speak out for their rights it's called righteous protest, but when men do the EXACT same thing it's "whining".
Sorry sister they tried that tactic with my people, (American Indians) too. It didn't work then and it isn't gonna work now.
I suppose you sided with the Nazis when they complained that the Jews being burned alive in the ovens were screaming too loudly.
Yeah, I know it's not exactly the same thing, but it's definitely the same mentality.
When my people were removed from our homelands and were starving and begged the soldiers for food they told us to stop whining, then, too.
Thundercloud.
"Hoka hey"
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
by Anonymous User on 05:30 AM September 26th, 2005 EST (#12)
|
|
|
|
|
Kinda ironic Prac Fem that you would characterise us as "whining" when the topic website is about a bunch of whining manhaters who believe that all men are b*stards and women are mostly all virginal paragons.
Just while you're here, perhaps you can explain your sister's pathetic reduction to an "invisible frightened child". Wonder what her day job is - I'd really like to have her save me from a burning building, or pilot the flight I'm on, or deal fairly with me if she came across me in a law enforcement or justicial environment.
And you probably still wonder why so many men have no time for the incessant hypocrisy of your average feminist.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Feminists sheer lack of any logical or justified basis for their warped ideology is proved by their constant reliance on shaming language (stop whining, cry-baby, you're not REAL men, etc) whenever they encounter any disagreement.
Feminists also hate it when men complain about anything because it threaten's women's monopoly on victimhood.
I'm utterly immune to shaming language. It's irrelevent. Who wants or needs the approval of a feminists - or women in general - anyway?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
by jenk on 08:11 AM September 26th, 2005 EST (#14)
|
|
|
|
|
If it bothers you so much why are you here?
The Biscuit Queen
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
by Anonymous User on 08:44 AM September 26th, 2005 EST (#15)
|
|
|
|
|
I love the fact that she's here. It probably bugs her a lot that other people (mainly men) get tired of this sh*t and have opinions different to hers.
I hope she reads many of the articles on this site. Her Women's Studies course will be so interesting this week.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
by Anonymous User on 10:14 AM September 26th, 2005 EST (#16)
|
|
|
|
|
No sensible man gives a damn what a feminist thinks of him, any more than a black man should care what a white supremacist thinks of them.
It's a trick we've all learned from lovely "people" like you, dear.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
by Anonymous User on 11:17 AM September 26th, 2005 EST (#19)
|
|
|
|
|
Exactly.
As an American Indian activist I've been called a "timber nigger" by white supremacists, a "honky"(??) by militant blacks and a whiner (Among other things) by militant feminists.
Water off the duck's back, sweetie.
All the name calling and shamming in the world isn't going to stop us from what we are GOING to do. And that is put a stop to your kind once and for all.
I LOVE being an M.R,A.!
Thundercloud.
"Hoka hey!"
P.S. And I don't say "Hoka hey!" for nothin'.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
by Anonymous User on 06:07 PM September 26th, 2005 EST (#23)
|
|
|
|
|
(Anon. quote) -- "What you're GOING to do? Give me a break! While all you cry-babies are on this site whining and crying on each other's shoulders, WE WOMEN, out in the real world, are walking all over you at every turn."
Me smells a skunk.
Women never refer to themselves as "we women..."
My vote is that this is a freshman university student enrolled in his first Womenz Studies class.
Or, a precocious sixth-grader with an older sister telling him what to type.
And if I'm wrong and this poster is actually female, I trust she has a really good mental health coverage plan.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
by Anonymous User on 12:12 PM September 27th, 2005 EST (#26)
|
|
|
|
|
Well, if "You women" are "walking over us at every turn" then what is "you women's" complaint?
I mean, My God, you complain about EVERYTHING ALL the time. Even when you get your way you whine about it.
And yeah, we may be lesser in number that you feminists but we're growing. The American Indian Movement (A.I.M.) started out with only a hand full of people now it's a internationally recognised organization. And now organizations like "Fathers for justice" are gaining national attention. And there are more men's groups being formed. We don't get much media attention (yet) because our media is infested with your kind (for now) But the A.I.M. gets little media attention, too but it's still getting the job done. Slowly and steadily, but done none the less. I see the same thing happening with the men's movement.
I tell you your time is VERY limited. So enjoy it while "you women" can.
Remember Custer thought he had the battle of "Little Big Horn" in the bag. In case you missed it, ...we Indians killed him.
Thundercloud.
"Hoka hey!"
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
by Anonymous User on 01:55 AM September 27th, 2005 EST (#25)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
by Anonymous User on 12:20 PM September 28th, 2005 EST (#32)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
by Anonymous User on 02:27 AM October 3rd, 2005 EST (#43)
|
|
|
|
|
Did I stutter? You are clearly trolling. Therefore you have nothing worthwhile to say.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
by Anonymous User on 12:25 PM September 28th, 2005 EST (#34)
|
|
|
|
|
>"We women out in the real world are walking all over you at every turn."
But I thought it was all about equality...,
Jee, I guess not.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
by Anonymous User on 03:07 PM September 28th, 2005 EST (#37)
|
|
|
|
|
He was being sarcastic, Broom head.
Thundercloud.
"Hoka hey!"
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
by Anonymous User on 11:14 AM September 29th, 2005 EST (#40)
|
|
|
|
|
Actually, TC, I'm a she, but yes I was being sarcastic.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
by Anonymous User on 03:03 AM September 28th, 2005 EST (#31)
|
|
|
|
|
"WE WOMEN, out in the real world, are walking all over you at every turn."
haha, what a dumbass.. she just proved our point!
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
by Anonymous User on 12:22 PM September 28th, 2005 EST (#33)
|
|
|
|
|
>"she just proved our point!"
Isn't it funny how often femroids trip themselves up by doing just that? :-)
Thundercloud.
"Hoka hey!"
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
by Anonymous User on 03:21 PM September 28th, 2005 EST (#38)
|
|
|
|
|
Oh, yes, there you go with that "whining" business.
"Oh, no I've got to try to shame them into silence, because their issues are starting to get some attention, and we can't have that!"
Sorry you can use the shame game all you want, and it won't do you any good.
I guess if a guy drowning calls for a life preserver he's whining in your opinion, as well.
B.T.W. Are you as much a racist as you are a misandrist?
Who am I kidding? of COURSE you are. In all my time as an Indian activist I've yet to meet a feminist that isn't a racist, too.
Sorry, sweets, but like all bigots, you and your ilk are gonna get what's coming to you. You always do.
Hitler,
Stalin,
Mussolini,
Custer...,
You know, your kind of people. *Evil grin*
Thundercloud.
"Hoka hey!"
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
by Anonymous User on 07:25 PM September 29th, 2005 EST (#41)
|
|
|
|
|
Enjoy the future men decide to give you - after all, by your own admission, you only have what you do (choices, rights, freedom, reproductive control, property) because men willingly gave it to you. It's too bad feminism has removed any incentive for men to continue carrying your weight.
THINK ABOUT THE FUTURE:
Men who don't care about what a woman thinks of them, since the concept of honor is long dead, and it was the only way women were able to successfully socialize men and maintain their desperate ties to a man's superior competitiveness, protection and strength. How long will you last sharing your feelings and yelling "victim" when the oil runs out? Any idea what "post-industrial civilization" is going to look like? It will be very much like pre-industrial civilization. Have a look through your women's studies textbook for the "herstory" of women in the 15th century for a preview.
Men who expect females like you to ante up, work in coal mines, die on the job in equal numbers and volunteer for frontline combat in equal or greater numbers to the male contribution if they expect equal civil or other rights.
Men who refuse to breed or support any woman - what's the point in giving a female a free ride for 20 years, exactly, when we'll never even see the bastards we're expected to pay for, even if said female actually managed not to "empower" herself through infidelity, and paternity testing proves they're actually ours for a change.
Men who demand equal prison time for women who commit crimes.
Men who do not accept non-working mothers as a valid social element. If you're so equal, get off your ass and support yourself for a change.
Men who can't even recall the definition of "chivalry", because there were no fathers around to teach it to them. Open your own doors.
Men who catch on to the fact that women consider the exploitation and dehumanization of men to be "empowerment", and decide that they ought to be empowering themselves by dehumanizing and explioiting women for their benefit, which will, after all, be a simple replication of the behavior of our mothers, sisters and the rest of you in our delightful, father-free childhoods.
So, like I said: THINK ABOUT THE FUTURE.
It doesn't matter if nobody is reading this site or listening to men fighting the destruction of their rights and families. The actions of feminists and fatherless homes will bring about ALL of the above without ANY further male intervention.
You're doomed and too busy yelling "oppression" to see it coming. Assuming feminists don't manage to breed themselves out of existence, Marxist revolution is an endless cycle. Apparently the women's studies department hasn't got to that inconvenient footnote buried in your textbooks yet.
It's no wonder feminists behave in the neurotic way you do. An existence built on lies and limitless greed must be a tangled place to have a personality.
I feel very, very sorry for people like you.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
by Anonymous User on 10:41 AM September 30th, 2005 EST (#42)
|
|
|
|
|
"Men (will) catch on to the fact that women consider the exploitation and dehumanization of men to be "empowerment", and decide that they ought to be empowering themselves by dehumanizing and exploiting women for their benefit"
Yes, this is how men will ultimately react to feminaziism.
Hotspur
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
by Anonymous User on 02:18 PM September 26th, 2005 EST (#21)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Now that you guys are all worked up about a benign, stupid website, here's a webpage from the other side to make you laugh.
After all the constant whining on this site, you all could use a good laugh!
What a bunch of cry-babies!
Okay, I get it! We're a bunch of cry-babies, and that funny website link is a "rattle" to distract us!
Yes, it was funny, and I laughed. But no, as you can see, I was not....distracted. I'm back again, mean as ever.
Muhahahaha!
-Fidelbogen-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
by Anonymous User on 08:21 PM September 26th, 2005 EST (#24)
|
|
|
|
|
Perhaps we should contact these mega-corps.
Jeff/This is not Equality
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
by Anonymous User on 12:53 PM September 27th, 2005 EST (#28)
|
|
|
|
|
In this day of "equality" between then genders, I find an amusing and sometimes enlightening thing to do with things like this is to rewrite the text with a gobal change of gender, then see how it sounds.
Each day, thousands of men around the world are cheated on by their girlfriends, fiancés and wives. A woman’s infidelity causes the destruction of thousands of marriages, engagements and relationships every year. What’s a man to do? Hire expensive private detectives? Pay for costly background checks? Now, men have a new cost-effective weapon in the war on cheating women! Founded by men with men in mind, www.DontDateHerBoy.com is a free service that allows brothers to share their experiences with cheating women by posting pictures and other information about them in an easy-to-use, searchable database. Using www.DontDateHerBoy.com is easy. To warn other men about a cheating woman by posting her picture and profile into the database, simply log on and follow the instructions for posting. To find out about a suspected cheater, log on, type the cheater’s name into the database and watch as the website searches through hundreds of pictures and profiles to find a match!
There, that's better. I can take it a lot less seriously now...
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
by Anonymous User on 07:41 PM September 27th, 2005 EST (#29)
|
|
|
|
|
You're absolutely right. I like it this way too. Shall we pass the hat for donations to the hosting and development expenses?
|
|
|
|
|
[an error occurred while processing this directive]
|
