|
This discussion has been archived.
No new comments can be posted.
|
 |
|
|
|
by khankrumthebulgar on 03:21 PM June 20th, 2005 EST (#1)
|
|
|
|
|
Shock, Gasp, Surprise a FemNazi Female Fire Chief in
SF bashed her Husband with a bottle. You mean Gasp...Women are capable of violence? Tell me it ain't so! I am surprised in San Francisco Queer Capital of Northern California that there is a City Official especially Macho Fire Services that has a FemNazi that isn't a dyke.
I should know I left that toilet of degradation over 10 years ago and don't miss it.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
by Anonymous User on 05:01 PM June 20th, 2005 EST (#2)
|
|
|
|
|
Actually, the term FemNazi originated with the ignorant Rush Limbaugh. Feminists are more correctly classified as Marxist-Feminists because the embrace the political systems and values of Carl Marx.
Warble
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
by Anonymous User on 03:33 PM June 21st, 2005 EST (#5)
|
|
|
|
|
Dittohd asks, "...Why do you even care where a term originated? Why does Rush Limbaugh even enter into this conversation?"
Rush coined the term feminazi, and yes he is quite influential. Why does it matter? Because it isn't historically accurate or representative of how current feminist theory evolved. There are no roots of feminism in the Nazi culture. Those who know this consider Rush quite ignorant on masculine issues. Sadly, most people fail to realize that feminist theory relies heavily on Marxist-Communist ideologies. Not Nazi theory.
Further, current family law is rooted in Marxist-Feminist ideology. There is no Nazi roots.
It matters that the public know the origins of current feminist theory, that they know the 60’s free-love socialist promoted the ideology, and that it originated with the single most bloody political system in the world (socialism/communism). There are currently 100 million dead and the numbers continue to rise. By contrast, the Nazi slaughter pales in comparison.
Ever notice how 99% of all female politicians are on the left and that they consider themselves to be progressives? To be a progressive means that you are in fact a socialist/communist. The term progressive is a codeword for communist. They adopted this term because they knew the public would not tolerate their openly identifying themselves as communists while passing communist family law.
So, calling these feminists Nazi's is in fact not only ignorant, but it does not represent the true composition of the majority of the feminists.
Further, when the public who hears the term Nazi their instinct is to instantly ignores you and they will not listen. By contrast, most of our culture knows instinctively that there is something wrong with the progressives and their political correctness.
Bottom line. Use the term feminazi or any derivation of the ___nazi term and you sound ignorant, stupid, ill-informed, and a member of the far right extremist branch, yet ironically the right has sold out males to the Marxist-Feminist because of ignorance, chivalry, and outright stupidity. They actually believe the inflated statistical lies that have been told by the feminists.
That’s why it matters.
Warble
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
by Anonymous User on 03:44 PM June 21st, 2005 EST (#6)
|
|
|
|
|
Dittohd notes, "Let's get an old dictionary and look at the term "racist" and see what it really meant before the African-American leaders hijacked and changed it to what they wanted it to mean."
Never let the dictionary define the terms of the issue. The African-American leaders are very smart to hijack the term. That strategy allowed them to redefine the terms of the debate on racism.
MRA's should do the same, but using historically ignorant and inflammatory terms like feminazi is just plain stupid. It may make for great radio ratings, but only the most retarded person would attempt to use such a term in a political debate to define the issue.
The number one priority of MRA’s should be to define the issue in terms that can permit for change. Using terms like feminazi will only cause MRA’s to have the appearance of white far right wing political extremists.
Finally, it is true that the progressives have seized control of our educational system and retroactively revised all of American history. That will change. The source documents are out there on the Internet, and the facts will not remain silent forever. People will learn to read this material and reject some communist professors second hand interpretation. History will be defined on its own terms on not on the terms of a political ideology that will pass.
When will the Marxist-Feminist culture pass? It will pass when the culture supporting the ideology collapses. I predict a few more decades (20-40 years). We will see it in our lifetime even if another MRA were to do nothing.
Warble
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
by Anonymous User on 05:14 PM June 22nd, 2005 EST (#8)
|
|
|
|
|
I don't use either term much, but I like femi-nazi better. It isn't meant to be historical, it's meant to draw a comparison by analogy. Feminists today are doing many of the same things nazis did (bashing the target group through media and myths, using economic and legal oppression, separating families, etc.). I agree there is a Marxist element to feminism, just as there is a "liberal" element. But my objection to feminism isn't about its right/left political alignment, but to it's hateful, hypocritical and oppressive tactics, which to me are more comparable to nazis than to marxists. I know at least one MRA who himself is so left that I'd consider him a marxist, but he is a hard-core men's rights activist nonetheless, and I don't see a contradition. Although most MRAs seem to have a rightward or libertarian lean, there are many exceptions. NCFM-LA has green party members, libertarians, Republicans and Democrats, and I appreciate that they get along and work together. One of the greens is Harry Crouch, who is an adamant MRA and one of the most active ones I've ever known. He confronts feminists for exactly what they are, with absolutely no shame. I respect Warble's framing of feminists in terms of "marxist-feminists," and I know others who do the same. More power to them. But I choose not to for numerous reasons one of which is that it can add to our unnecessary right/left divisions, and we're already fragmented enough. "Femi-nazi," on the other hand, is less divisive among us, and, to me, a far more accurate portrayal of what I oppose about feminism. But I do agree with Warble that even that term can, in some contexts, be counterproductive. Again, I usually don't use either term.
Marc A.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
by Anonymous User on 05:03 PM June 20th, 2005 EST (#3)
|
|
|
|
|
Now if this were a male the police would have cited the "mandatory arrest" laws (policies) and that would have been the end if the issue.
However, this is a woman. The law doesn't apply to women.
Warble
|
|
|
|
|
[an error occurred while processing this directive]
|
What will the excuse be this time, "job-related stress"? Read it