[an error occurred while processing this directive]
Female Mobs Murder Men Who Were Freed by Courts
posted by Thomas on 03:47 PM November 11th, 2004
News Remind me never to visit India.

Mobs of women are attacking and killing or burning down the houses of men, some of whom were set free by the courts after being accused of rape and other crimes. In one case, a man was stabbed and stoned to death in court by a mob led by women. Police detained five women, but released them in response to public outcry.

Liza Minnelli Sued Over Sexual Harasment | More Truth about Male DV Victims  >

  
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
WHAT? (Score:1)
by DeepThought (deep.42.thought@gmailEARTH.com) on 08:42 PM November 11th, 2004 EST (#1)
(User #1487 Info)
"ARREST WOMEN GUILTY OF MURDER AGAINST A MAN WHO WAS CLEARED OF HIS CRIME IN A COURT OF LAW? HOW DARE YOU!"

The more of these I read, the more I lose faith in our leaders. If murder and mobs aren't enough to arrest a person, what is?
-DeepThought --- Erase the EARTH to gmail me.
Accuse a Man - End His Life (Score:0)
by Anonymous User on 10:08 AM November 12th, 2004 EST (#2)
Thanks to Radical/Gender feminism that has its roots in women's studies classes on college campuses, everyone is taught to villify men. There is a Clothesline Project (scam) scheduled at the college where I work for Nov. 22-24, and it only talks about sexual and physical violence committed against women.

Thanks to taxpayer funded man-hating spread by these kind of events it is and has been open season on all men for a long time. The cancerous tentacles of radical/gender feminism reach from America, to Briton, to Canada, to Australia, to India, and to other places.

Life for men has become so bad that if you accuse a man, you effectively end his life here . This guy was lucky if you call 20 years of your life stolen, lucky. No physical evidence is required, just liars like the ones mentioned in the article, and all those trained by taxpayer funded women's studies classes on college campuses. College campuses that have women's studies classes comprise the biggest hate-movemont in the history of all the aforementioned countries. ...and they still dare call it the free world. The radical/gender feminist movements influencing these countries do Adolph Hitler proud.

"...law enforcement officials, social workers, and prosecutors coerced them into making false allegations..." Yes, in California all of these recieve training based on radical/gender feminist ideology. In feminazi america, the great man-hating state of california/femi-nazifornia is one of the main forces spreading that evil man-hating ideology to other places.

Ray
Re:Accuse a Man - End His Life (Score:1)
by MAUS on 02:03 PM November 13th, 2004 EST (#3)
(User #1582 Info)
Ray what concerns me the most about all of this...let me take a moment to breathe and gather my thoughts for the best way to express this....what the Hell those who were bound and determined to kill Socrates and Christ over what they had to say just up and did it anyway...if no peacefull democratic means exists for removing these non elected orchestrators of the culture of mysandry from positions of power...violence is bound to result because tollerating their continued abuse of power simply is not an option. Ok throw me in jail...that would be like trying to prevent a hurricane by jailing the weatherman. This is simply the sad pattern of history.

Oskar Schindler was the only member of the Nazi Party who was ever given the honour of planting a commemorative olive tree on the Avenue of the Righteous Among Nations in Tel Aviv. He used his power and position to trick the German government into letting hundreds of Jews survive.

He said : "I have always enjoyed the good things in life including power. I have known many people who have had power who did not seem to know how to enjoy it. It was as if, to them, power existed for the abuse of those in their charge. By far the finest way to savour and enjoy power is to have the sincere and heart felt gratitude of those you have power over."

Can any of the trolls who hate watch monitor this site, explain to me or to any other like minded man or woman who use this site why we aught to have sincere and heart felt gratitude toward any mysandrist who has power?

If what is said here is reported to the government...as I know it is in Canada...To those who have recently been elected in the United States, I do not say this in anger, tears are streaming down my face as I type this, for our sake, for their sake, for the sake of all living things, find the courage to do the right thing and remove from power all appointees who have abused their power and for whom there exists no peacefull democratic means of doing so.

Blessed is the compassion that arises when the heart has been broken...I solemly vow that I shall become enlightened for the sake of all living things.
Re:Accuse a Man - End His Life (Score:0)
by Anonymous User on 11:41 AM November 14th, 2004 EST (#6)
"If what is said here is reported to the government...as I know it is in Canada...To those who have recently been elected in the United States, I do not say this in anger,

Well spoken, let us hope that more men will join us in our Ghandi-esque protests as we peacefully oppose the "radical/gender feminist hate-movements" that are governing us.

The men's movement has it's cycles of activism, but it is nice to see a solid core of dedicated men getting the word out. I would say, judging by the letters that Glenn Sacks was involved in bringing forth this past week, more and more men are becoming aware that their are truckloads of issues oppressing the lives of decent men.

Men have been disposable victims of the needs of government and family to the point that they have been stripped of all support services and are basically nothing more than disposable slaves to government and family. The disrespect that is men's lot in life is so flagrant that it is even evident in the kind of male bashing commercials and programs we see on our mundane TV's. The disrespect for men is everywhere in society and government. It is not coincidental that this disrespect is just like the man-hating taught in tax-payer funded, radical/gender feminist women's studies classes on college campuses. That is were it all begins.

Canada, the U.S. and all other points North, South, East and West don't want to hear about all this but I guess they'll just have to get used to it, because it's here to stay and growing. It is great to stand beside so many other good men in this worldwide survival effort know as the men's movement.

Sincerely, Ray

click Feminist Lies Make Bad Laws

Please do not scroll up the page of the linked item(s). All the info I'm trying to convey is as the page initially comes up.
We cannot really support AKKI Yadav (Score:1)
by bharati on 04:23 AM November 14th, 2004 EST (#4)
(User #1817 Info)
Akki Yadav is no Kobe Bryant. Aki Yadav is actually a gangaster and not an innocent caught in the middle. He has a lot of murder charges against him and multiple rape cases .
When I mean Rape I mean Real Rape where coercion is involved. Not the fake under drunken state or psychological state type of rape .

It would be difficult to defend him in any circumstances.

Finally I agree what the women did was murder and that they could have appealed to the high court against acquittal but any of the seven mens rights organisation in India trying to take up AKKI Yadavas case would shoot themselves in the foots.


Re:We cannot really support AKKI Yadav (Score:0)
by Anonymous User on 08:20 AM November 14th, 2004 EST (#5)
Indianmale

Yes, you're right Bharathi, Akku Yadav terrorised men and women who lived in his 'area'. But I also agree nobody is above the law and women who killed him should be prosecuted. And this is exactly why admire Gandhi. He broke the laws he thought were unfair, and was willing to face up to the consequences.

Also, you mentioned `seven men's rights groups in India'. Can you provide a quick reference? I can direct men who need their services to thm?

Thanx.
Re:We cannot really support AKKI Yadav (Score:2)
by Thomas on 02:34 PM November 15th, 2004 EST (#9)
(User #280 Info)
Aki Yadav is actually a gangaster and not an innocent caught in the middle. He has a lot of murder charges against him and multiple rape cases .

Yes, he had charges against him. Charges don't prove guilt. Do you have proof that he was guilty?

Thomas
-- Creating hostile environments for feminazis since the 1970s.

Re:We cannot really support AKKI Yadav (Score:0)
by Anonymous User on 11:57 PM November 16th, 2004 EST (#11)
Well, no proof that's legally admissible. But he was a mafiosi, unleashed a rein of terror in the ghettos of Nagpur, India. He and his gang openly went to people's houses, threatened them. No witnesses were prepared to testify against him.

Having said all this, still 1)Murder is murder, and women who murdered him must be prosecuted, 2) Contrary to what this British newspaper says, the police did not release these women after `a public outcry'. It was forced to do this by India's National Commission for Women and 3) This Akku Yadav also terrorised innocent men. If these men had murdered him, I'm sure they would not get this soft treatment from the police. So gender bias (against men) is clearly at work here.
Regrettable but Understandable Rough Justice (Score:2)
by AngryMan (end_misandryNOSPAM@yahoo.co.uk) on 11:28 AM November 15th, 2004 EST (#7)
(User #1810 Info)
I'm probably going to get flamed for this, but I have some sympathy for the women in question. It sounds like the whole thing resulted from a serious failure of state power.

(Despite the Left's discomfort with the notion of political power, it is here to stay; you can't abolish it, the only option is to manage it, and allocate it fairly, and the best method we know of for doing that is democracy).

If there is no adequate law enforcement, you end up with a power vacuum. Potential predators will recognise that they can get away with offending, and their victims will have no redress.

If there is a serial rapist in your neighbourhood and effectively no police, what would you do? Vigilantism is inevitable. The fact that it was led by women is (i) due to the fact that the crime was rape, and (ii) it was reported that way because it makes for a better story.

On the face of it, these women vigilantes weren't anti-men, they were going after particular known criminals.

We need to know what was wrong with the police here, was there police corruption or what?

Of course the vigilantes need to be arrested and charged, but they will be subject to the same delays and incompetence that got the rapist off, they can argue self-defence, and they have popular support.

Feminism will continue as long as there is money to be made from hating men.
Re:Regrettable but Understandable Rough Justice (Score:2)
by Thomas on 02:15 PM November 15th, 2004 EST (#8)
(User #280 Info)
I have some sympathy for the women in question. It sounds like the whole thing resulted from a serious failure of state power.

That's certainly what the article is intended to convey. The problem that I have is that India is in many ways an extremely misandrist nation. I'd be surprised if the rate of false accusations by women against men isn't about the same there as it is in the US, where about 50% of rape accusations are fabrications. Maybe Akku Yadav was guilty of some or all of the crimes of which he was accused, but it is an extremely bad sign that the police released five women, who were being held on his brutal murder in court, because of public outcry.

This sort of thing will be justified in the minds of many, when the murders and other assaults are carried out against men who seem to be extremely vicious. Then, as people become used to accepting them, the standard for justifying such attacks will probably be lowered.

I've been told by numerous women in the US that no woman would ever accuse a man of rape unless he were guilty. In their minds, and the minds of similar feminist-types, whenever a man is acquitted and released after being accused of rape, the mens' release has "resulted from a serious failure of state power."

The problem with these cases in India is that the women, who have taken the law into their own hands to the point of murdering accused men, receive public approbation. If women who commit these crimes are not severely punished, then men who support those women will have no reason to object if and when they are falsely accused and then brutally attacked after managing to win an acquittal in court.

Thomas
-- Creating hostile environments for feminazis since the 1970s.

Re:Regrettable but Understandable Rough Justice (Score:0)
by Anonymous User on 11:16 PM December 6th, 2004 EST (#12)
The actual statistic for false reports of rape in the US is closer to 2% despite anti-feminist literature claiming it is higher by using faulty data and poor research methods--such as defining cases in which women drop charges as "false" reports. The rate of false reports of rape in the US is one of the lowest rates for all crimes, as most other crimes have false report rates at closer to 8-10%.
Re:Regrettable but Understandable Rough Justice (Score:0)
by Anonymous User on 07:53 AM November 16th, 2004 EST (#10)
While I agree that in any civil society justice system has the right to decide "beyond reasonable doubt".
But the major difference is that AKKU Yadav is what is called as "history sheeter". Typically the criminal minded comes in multiple charges whereis rape is one of them .There is an absence of any monetary bargaining or any fame mongering by these women. that is why sounds true that he must have terrorised the neighbourhood which lead to his acquital.

He has allegations and charges from multiple source and multiple types of crime and that is why it was reasonably to reasonable to presume he was guilty.

Again I agree with Thomas that it is the court system who has decide guilt and convict and everyones normal human rights have to be protected and deserves due process of law

But I think it would be wrong to equate him with the young college kids accussed of rape or basket ball player accussed of rape.

It was person who was alleged to be a gangster or mafia not someone with normal business or professional.


[an error occurred while processing this directive]