[an error occurred while processing this directive]
29 Year Old Woman Arrested for Sex with 8 Year Old
posted by Matt on 05:40 PM November 10th, 2004
Boys/Young Men amperro writes "How much longer will the feminists deny that this crime happens?

Procreation Bans in Parole | Woman Reportedly Tortures 'Special Needs' Students  >

  
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Forever (Score:0)
by Anonymous User on 06:13 PM November 10th, 2004 EST (#1)
I feel the fems will deny this crime in perpetuity. The real question is how long will SOCIETY deny the existence of female perpetrated child sex abuse.
Hotspur
Re:Forever (Score:1)
by thea on 08:03 PM November 10th, 2004 EST (#3)
(User #1862 Info)
Once society sees the absurdity of feminism through horrific crimes like this perpetrated by female sex offenders, they will denounce feminism as the fascist idiot-ology that it is.

The myth of males only committing these kinds of crimes is the opium used by the feminists to dumb-down and blind society from the truth.

Thank God, I have a female criminal justice professor who knows better and is teaching us that female sex offenders and violent female criminals are on the rise more so than males.

The news and media just makes it seem as if that male are always committing all of the violent and sexual crimes. Gee I wonder why? (I love you sarcasm) No feminist bullshit with my prof, nope. She's the 'brutally honest Anti-feminist-P.C.' truth types.
*Ms.Thea the Pre-Law Major, Pro-Gender Egalitarian, and Pro-Reproductive Rights Activist*
Re:Forever (Score:0)
by Anonymous User on 03:30 PM November 11th, 2004 EST (#8)
Yes.
The media sits on these female-offender stories. They simply will NOT report them.
The bias in the media isn't nessisairily what they do report, it's what they DON'T report...!

  Thundercloud.
  "Hoka hey!"
Yuck (Score:0)
by Anonymous User on 07:26 PM November 10th, 2004 EST (#2)

From the article:

" 'The woman could have a lot of confusion and unmet needs that can be safely met with an 8-year-old,' he said. "

Sounds like an attempt at excusing inexcusable behavior.
Re:Yuck (Score:1)
by Ragtime on 08:22 PM November 10th, 2004 EST (#4)
(User #288 Info)
Try this:

"28 year old man has sex with 8 year old girl."
'The man could have a lot of confusion and unmet needs that can be safely met with an 8-year-old,' he said.

Is this totally inexcusable? Damn straight. And it is when a woman does it, too. Same rules, same penalty.

Ragtime

The Uppity Wallet

The opinions expressed above are my own, but you're welcome to adopt them.

Wow! (Score:2)
by Dittohd on 08:40 PM November 10th, 2004 EST (#5)
(User #1075 Info)
Have y'll seen this?

Especially this tidbit:

>The divorced Birch Drive resident has told investigators the boy — a playmate of her own 7-year-old daughter — was the aggressor in their relationship. Imre said he ordered her to dump an adult boyfriend and told her not to take birth control pills.

Isn't it amazing how much influence and control men have over women? How impotent and weak women are at the hands of men, even when it's an 8 year old boy with a 29 year old woman?

Who says women are equal to men?

Or is she just trying to give us all the impression that she's so insane that she shouldn't be punished, just sent temporarily to a mental institution until she's recovered and no longer dangerous to the general public?

Ha! ha!

Dittohd

Re:Wow! (Score:1)
by Kyo on 10:00 AM November 11th, 2004 EST (#6)
(User #1837 Info)
That article refers to her as a "mom" in the headline and at first I thought it would take her side.

How an adult can accuse an 8-year-old of "ordering her not to use birth control pills" is beyond my imagination. As if he could even impregnate her!

And if a male child molester compounded his crimes with such ridiculous comments as "but the 8-year-old girl ordered me not to..."

Oh, forget it. I give up on society.

Kyo
Re:Wow! (Score:1)
by Dave K on 10:21 AM November 11th, 2004 EST (#7)
(User #1101 Info)
>The divorced Birch Drive resident has told investigators the boy — a playmate of her own 7-year-old daughter — was the aggressor in their relationship. Imre said he ordered her to dump an adult boyfriend and told her not to take birth control pills.

That is totally unfuckingbelievably INSANE!

I want to see the feminuts rally around this bird... just to show the rest of the world how out of touch with reality they are.

Dave K - A Radical Moderate
Re:Wow! (Score:0)
by Anonymous User on 03:38 PM November 11th, 2004 EST (#9)
Note that the BS about the boy being the "aggressor" in the relationship is right at the top of the article.

It's astonishing to see the usual anti-male reporting tactics even in this egregious case.


Telltale sign (Score:1)
by The_Beedle on 04:16 PM November 11th, 2004 EST (#10)
(User #1529 Info)
"News of men preying on girls is more common than cases of women molesting boys."

Obviously if it gets more press it must be more common!
'relationship'? (Score:0)
by Anonymous User on 11:57 PM November 11th, 2004 EST (#11)
"Mary Kay Letourneau, then 35, gained national notoriety when she was convicted in 1997 of having a sexual relationship with a student, 13-year-old Vili Fualaau."

Is this not considered 'rape'? Why do they use the word "relationship"?

Am I wrong about the definition of rape?

Michael

boo-hoo (Score:0)
by Anonymous User on 12:02 AM November 12th, 2004 EST (#12)
"The judge agreed that Imre poses a danger to the community, but ordered her held in lieu of $250,000 bond. She continued the case to Nov. 30.

Imre broke into sobs as she was led away by judicial marshals, the chains around her ankles jangling as she was led out of the courtroom.

Her ordeal did not end there. Once outside the courtroom, she was led past a cell of male inmates who loudly jeered her."

"Her ordeal"???

boo-hoo

Michael
[an error occurred while processing this directive]