[an error occurred while processing this directive]
John Kerry opens thread on mens issues
posted by Adam on 09:19 AM June 9th, 2004
News Betrayed in America writes "The wage gap brought MRA's to Kerry's "womens issues" thread. This opened the door to the report (not study) used to foster womens vote, by MRA's. A lot of debunking going on there. Also the MRA's injected some men's issues. . .to the point were a mens issue's thread was opened. Now I don't know if the thread was an attempt to derail the men on the wage gap or a genuine desire to here mens issues. Either way there is a public thread on a presidetial candidates site. It seems to be a good opportunity to get some issues into public debate. Please be courtious as they tend to ban people easily there. Beware there are a couple of seemingly feminist that are attempting to trivialize and deter the issues. Stay focused. . .have fun! One note: If the link doesn't work. . .the thread is listed under the topic of "womens issues" as "issues that concern men"."

Update: Betrayed in America writes "Its under "Civil rights for all Americans" now. Here's the link."

Forbes article covers worker injuries... sort of. | Abusive women  >

  
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Thread closed (Score:1)
by Betrayed in America on 09:28 PM June 9th, 2004 EST (#1)
(User #1381 Info)
Thread closed after about 6 pages...go figure!!!
Re:Thread closed (Score:0)
by Anonymous User on 10:11 PM June 9th, 2004 EST (#2)
Was it deleted? 'Cause I can't even find it listed as locked in the Women's Issues forum. (Of course, some forums have varying practices such as moving all locked threads to a separate forum).
It's under "Civil Rights for All Americans" (Score:2)
by TLE on 10:58 PM June 9th, 2004 EST (#3)
(User #1376 Info)
There's actually a "Men's Issues" thread open, 7 pages long now under the civil rights heading.
TLE found it (Score:1)
by Betrayed in America on 11:07 PM June 9th, 2004 EST (#4)
(User #1381 Info)
http://forum.johnkerry.com/index.php?act=SF&s=&f=5 3

Seems to be picking up momentum again!!!

Re:TLE found it (Score:0)
by Anonymous User on 06:48 AM June 10th, 2004 EST (#5)
Remove the space between the 5 and the 3 when you put the URL in the browser, otherwise you'll get an error message. I don't have time right now, but will check back later.

Ray


God save me from the liberals (Score:2)
by jenk on 12:09 PM June 10th, 2004 EST (#6)
(User #1176 Info)
Wow, the leaps of logic are astounding. And I thought all the crazy people were locked up!

Bush has my vote.

The Biscuit Queen
Re:God save me from the liberals (Score:1)
by scudsucker on 02:10 AM June 11th, 2004 EST (#8)
(User #700 Info)
If you're complaining about leaps of logic, then wtf are you voting for Bush?
Re:God save me from the liberals (Score:2)
by jenk on 07:36 PM June 11th, 2004 EST (#9)
(User #1176 Info)
Because Bush is the lesser of two evils. He at least tries to hold some social standards, and he stands behind the strength of his convictions. Right or wrong, he believes in what he is doing. Unlike Kerry, who is against abortion but is willing to fight to support it. How on earth can you trust someone who not only isn't willing to fight for what they believe in, but fights for the other side?

The liberals would pull us out of Iraq immediately, which would only leave a huge gaping hole for the next power hungry psycho to fill and we would be right back where we started. At least Bush knows that while it isn't the popular thing to do, the right thing is to finish the job.
While I don't feel passionate for Bush, I feel down right frightened of Kerry and the democrats. I don't think we have recovered from Clinton enough to stomach another democrat.

Anyways, you have a better choice?
Re:God save me from the liberals (Score:0)
by Anonymous User on 09:17 PM June 11th, 2004 EST (#10)
"While I don't feel passionate for Bush, I feel down right frightened of Kerry and the democrats. I don't think we have recovered from Clinton enough to stomach another democrat."

Jen, I agree with you. Thank you for your courage, common sense, and decency. While Bush is far from perfect, life for men and traditional families under John F. Kerry will be a down right catastrophe when he empowers and gives free reign to radical/Stalinist/gender feminists across America. You are right to say that we have not yet recovered from Clinton's attack on men and families using such tyrannies as the Violence Against Women Act (VAWA), and other radical/Stalinist/gender feminist programs designed to destroy traditional families, rip children out of parents lives, and vilify, criminalize men and heterosexuality. Radical/Stalinist/gender feminists also want to seize property and wealth of heterosexual men through whatever means available, and VAWA has been a significant effort in doing that (Stalinist transference of wealth from the perceived privileged to the perceived oppressed class).

Sincerely, Ray

(click) Stalinist Feminism

(click) Women's Studies Conspires to Destroy Heterosexual Families

(click) Get Government's Big Nose Out of Family Business

(Please do not scroll up the page of the linked item(s). All the info I am trying to convey is only as the page comes up initially.)

Re:God save me from the liberals (Score:0)
by Anonymous User on 08:36 PM July 3rd, 2004 EST (#11)
I'm guessing you have not heard any of John Kerry's campaigning, because he has not said he would pull the troops out of Iraq right away, when elected President.
And the only thing Bush believes he is doing is making a lot of money for his friends and family through war profiteering. Someone hasn't caught up on the news.
Kerry is no friend to men (Score:1)
by Tom on 05:42 PM June 10th, 2004 EST (#7)
(User #192 Info) http://www.standyourground.com
Kerry is no different from the rest of the pandering politicians. He seeks out the female vote and ignores men. His web site will tell you that in very short order. Here's a quote:

      “In case after case, President Bush’s actions have made American women less safe and less secure - on the job and on the streets. As president, I will put American government and our legal system back on the side of women. I will stand up for their security, ensure their safety, support their rights, and guarantee their dignity. This nation can do no less.”


Duh. Look at his issues page. Yep, he's got women's issues but hope ain't got nuttin about men. Now how bout that??


Do we have True Equality?
[an error occurred while processing this directive]