[an error occurred while processing this directive]
|
posted by Adam on 11:08 AM May 27th, 2004
|
|
|
|
|
Anon user writes "Columnist Glenn Sacks defends the English Fathers' Rights group Fathers 4 Justice in his latest column here. While F4J has received criticism for its actions, Sacks points out that "most protesters have court-ordered visitation with their children but cannot get English courts to enforce those rights. Their protests have broken the law, but have done so only in an effort to get the English government to enforce the law."
|
|
|
|
< Honda Pilot ad: "My husband was raised by wolves" | Major Seattle Station Spreads Misandry >
|
|
This discussion has been archived.
No new comments can be posted.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The article is quite good, but it does keep talking about the "English" government, courts etc. So as not to leave out the other parts of Britain it would be better and more correct to put "British".
|
|
|
|
|
[an error occurred while processing this directive]
|