[an error occurred while processing this directive]
False rape accuser convicted of 2nd degree murder
posted by Adam on 09:21 AM March 18th, 2004
False Accusations Rand T. writes ""A 17-year-old girl whose false rape claim led to the shooting death of television and film actor Merlin Santana was convicted Tuesday of second-degree murder" article here"

Registration Required.

Another falsified police report | U.S. Supreme Court ruling on Hearsay Evidence  >

  
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Link with no registration req'd (Score:0)
by Anonymous User on 10:32 AM March 18th, 2004 EST (#1)
Here is a link with no registration req'd:

http://www.usatoday.com/life/2004-03-16-santana-co nviction_x.htm

Jeff
html tags are your friends (Score:1)
by scudsucker on 06:10 PM March 18th, 2004 EST (#4)
(User #700 Info)
even better link
Her sentence is WAY to light!!! (Score:1)
by LSBeene on 11:43 AM March 18th, 2004 EST (#2)
(User #1387 Info)
So, in a nutshell, she'll get AT MOST 8 YEARS for:
1) falsely accusing a man of rape
2) initiating a murder (it was HER false allegation)
3) participating in the murder (she was the get away car driver)

She was the cause of ALL of this. No if's, and's, or buts about it. The other guys are serving huge chunks of their lives for their crimes, why in the hell is this **17** year old spending AT MOST 8 years in JUVENILE HALL for MURDER!?

Why not charge rapists with disorderly conduct and call it even?

Steven
Guerilla Gender Warfare is just Hate Speech in polite text
Re:Her sentence is WAY to light!!! (Score:1)
by Cain on 02:02 PM March 18th, 2004 EST (#3)
(User #1580 Info)
"Why not charge rapists with disorderly conduct and call it even?"

Best line ive seen in months !!

"All you fascists bound to lose" - Woody Guthrie
yes her sentence is too low, BUT... (Score:1)
by scudsucker on 06:18 PM March 18th, 2004 EST (#5)
(User #700 Info)
...she was still a minor when this crime was committed and so she should be sentenced as a minor. One of my biggest beefs with the criminal justice system is how minors are sentenced as adults. In most states you can't drive until you're 16, vote until you're 18, or drink until you're 21. And yet in states like Florida, 12 year olds have been sentenced as adults.

Responsibilities and privleges should go hand in hand. If you can't drink, drive or vote because you lack the maturity to do so due to age, then WTF are teenagers held to the same level of responsibility as 30 year olds? This is bullshit. "Adult sentences for adult crimes!" they say. Then why don't we have juvenile sentences for juvenile crimes?
SCUDSUCKER (Score:1)
by LSBeene on 09:05 PM March 18th, 2004 EST (#6)
(User #1387 Info)
I agree, but my problem is this girl was the ring leader in this WHOLE thing.

She falsely accused him of rape. She THEN, with prior knowledge of what was going to happen, drove the getaway car after he was murdered.

She is a cold, lying, accomplice to murder, who participated in taking another human being's life.

And BOY children are sentenced as adults for JUST this reason.

Nope, in my opinion she is EXACTLY the poster child for when "children" need to be tried as adults.
Guerilla Gender Warfare is just Hate Speech in polite text
I'M NOT BLIND! (Score:1)
by scudsucker on 10:33 PM March 18th, 2004 EST (#7)
(User #700 Info)
You're caps lock broken? :)

No doubt this was a cold blooded murder - but throw her the maximum juvenile sentence, not an adult one. LSBeene, whats a greater responsiblity: voting, or responsiblity for someones life? The latter is obviously greater, so why can you be sentenced as an adult a full 6-7 years before you can vote? Its two faced hypocracy at its finest.

It should be:

1. voting
2. driving
3. drinking
4. adult sentences

rather than:

1. adult sentences
2. driving
3. voting
4. drinking

I would liken it to the draft: if you are going to be held to the same standard as those older than you, you should at least have a say (voting) in what those standards are.
I know you're not blind (Score:1)
by LSBeene on 10:57 PM March 18th, 2004 EST (#8)
(User #1387 Info)
I wasn't "yelling" at you ... just being passionate about the issue.

Sorry if it came out that way.

No disrespect meant.

Steven
Guerilla Gender Warfare is just Hate Speech in polite text
Re:I know you're not blind (Score:1)
by scudsucker on 12:09 AM March 19th, 2004 EST (#10)
(User #700 Info)
No disrespect meant.

None taken, thus the use of the smilie. :)
Re:I know you're not blind (Score:0)
by Anonymous User on 01:48 PM March 19th, 2004 EST (#12)
Personaly I'm glad to see that kind of passion.
The men's movement would be less without it.

  Thundercloud.
  "Hoka hey!"
The Silver Lining To This (Score:2)
by Luek on 11:31 PM March 18th, 2004 EST (#9)
(User #358 Info)
The good part of this story is that the two self-hating male morons who fell for this little slut's rape whine and actually committed the murder did get significant sentences. They didn't get any slack for doing what a chivalrous man's got to do when a little helpless female cries rape! But of course the same judicial system that did not give these morons leniency is the same system that does the same thing to innocent men victims of the feminist fueled rape hysteria everyday. For example the political prisoner William Hetherington case in Michigan whose NCFM freedom project site is on this web page.
Luek (Score:2)
by Thomas on 01:15 PM March 19th, 2004 EST (#11)
(User #280 Info)
I'd like to thank Luek for also submitting this story.

Thomas
-- Creating hostile environments for feminazis since the 1970s.

[an error occurred while processing this directive]