|
This discussion has been archived.
No new comments can be posted.
|
 |
|
|
|
by Anonymous User on Saturday May 17, @06:12PM EST (#1)
|
|
|
|
|
I've seen women/feminists comment on suicide bombers and they blame the fact that they are bombers because of men. And no argues otherwise. They say women are just doing this for the benefit of men and not themselves since Islam is patriarchal or something to that effect. They see the bomber as the victim just as the people she bombed are victims of Islamic patriarchal Islamic fundamentalism. Pointing out that there are female terrorists further proves men are really the problem.
Aaron
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For me, I do "prefer" women dying from perpetuating terrorism than men....this way, the life expectancy gap is more likely to be bridged ! Given that Islamic terrorism seems unavoidable for now, it's "better" that men are not the only ones as usual to be sacrificed to a religious or political cause.
Sorry if I sound tough, but this is really the way I feel....the two terrorist women's death is a by-word for the survival of two men....do no forget that.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For me, I do "prefer" women dying from perpetuating terrorism than men....this way, the life expectancy gap is more likely to be bridged ! Given that Islamic terrorism seems unavoidable for now, it's "better" that men are not the only ones as usual to be sacrificed to a religious or political cause.
Let feminists invent arguments for "blaming" men (or Martians or non-interacting space-like separated particles at the opposite end of the universe) for female terrorists. If the feminists want to insist that a female life is worth more than a male life, then fine: every female terrorist who self-destructs cannot give birth to any more potential terrorists. If it weren't for the damage that all terrorists cause, I'd encourage as many female terrorists as possible to undertake suicide missions, to the point of extinction.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Feminists always try to protect women from responsibility for their bad behavior, while insisting that women be given credit for their positive efforts. It's standard operating procedure. Patricia Pearson has talked about this tendency on the part of society to deny female aggression.
The question Pearson raises is: If women demand to be treated as men's equals in every other sphere of life, why should women be excused from taking responsibility for their less honorable actions?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
by Anonymous User on Saturday May 17, @08:18PM EST (#4)
|
|
|
|
|
"If women demand to be treated as men's equals in every other sphere of life, why should women be excused from taking responsibility for their less honorable actions?"
I"ve asked myself this same question. And I can't believe how women can get away with blaming their bad actions on men. I go to this one board and some of the women are just hypcritical and shrill. Once I heard about the female bombers I knew right then and there men would be blamed and sure enough we were. But of course men would be seen as sexists if they claimed responsibility for women's honorable actions, that's the other side of the same coin if you ask me.
Aaron
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
by Anonymous User on Sunday May 18, @04:19PM EST (#5)
|
|
|
|
|
I can't belive they didn't tell us about the "almond eyes" or "chestnut curls" of these murderesses. Also, I haven't heard a thing about this story from any of the 3 alphabet suit networks.
Mark
|
|
|
|
|
[an error occurred while processing this directive]
