|
This discussion has been archived.
No new comments can be posted.
|
 |
|
|
|
by Roy on 06:18 PM March 4th, 2006 EST (#1)
|
|
|
|
|
Don't ever accuse your wife of improperly storing the potatoes!
She might shoot you dead six times and get acquitted!
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
by Davidadelong on 06:22 PM March 4th, 2006 EST (#2)
|
|
|
|
|
We went through the same kind of treatment here in the U.S. It is written that the laws of the land are used to administrate society. If there is a repeating pattern then perhaps we should pay attention to it. Turn the Women against the Men, and then tighten the screws of control. Hmmm, they have already started turning the screws here, do we just wait and see how tight? "It is a good day to die!" But, I would rather break the screwdriver!!!
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
by canaryguy
(nospam.canaryguy@nospam.stealthfool.com)
on 08:07 PM March 4th, 2006 EST (#3)
|
|
|
|
|
What an accomplishment for feminism. They've taken a joke about the South(ern U.S.) and made it a working legal strategy.
'...where "He needed killin'" is a valid defense strategy...'
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
by al_nbd on 11:14 PM March 4th, 2006 EST (#4)
|
|
|
|
|
This is something surrealistic.
The West is agonizing animal.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
by bull on 12:49 AM March 5th, 2006 EST (#5)
|
|
|
|
|
Hmmm, lets see, she was competent and industrious enough to carefully plot her husband’s assassination in such detail as to include donning camouflage and carefully selecting a sniper’s nest. Then, after 90 minutes to reconsider, coldly follows through. It seems to me that she possesses the faculties required to go another route. That is to say, she could have been just as tenacious in seeking help from one of the multitude of support agencies exclusively available to women for her "alleged" abuse? Go figure!
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
by A.J. on 12:06 PM March 5th, 2006 EST (#6)
|
|
|
|
|
'...where "He needed killin'" is a valid defense strategy...'
Nowhere are concepts like “escalating violence” or “revenge killing” used or even implied in this case. How can a sane legal system condone murder based on the victim having mistreated the perp in the past? The marriage of chivalry and misandry has resulted in thorough corruption of the legal systems in the (so-called) civilized world.
...the prosecution would have to prove beyond a reasonable doubt that Mrs MacDonald did not kill her husband in self defence or after being provoked.
Donning camouflage and waiting for 90 minutes in a carefully selected sniper’s nest leaves reasonable doubt? The inmates are running the asylum.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
by Luek on 03:11 PM March 5th, 2006 EST (#7)
|
|
|
|
|
The male victims of these murderous wives or girlfriends were the son's, brothers, nephews or uncles of family members who loved them. The relatives of these murder victims should take the law into their own hands and administer the justice to these criminal females that the feminist cowed state should have done. A female predator getting away with it by playing the shop worn "abuse excuse" card has got to stop now.
Often in trials of male criminals their defense lawyers bring up their childhoods were their defendant was seriously abused. This is done to get them off or get them a less harsh sentence. This tactic seldom works even though there is usually solid evidence of a terribly abusive childhood. We don't let males use the "abuse excuse" why continue to let murdering females use it?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
by TomP on 05:14 PM March 5th, 2006 EST (#8)
|
|
|
|
|
as usual in these cases, he's not alive to defend himself from charges of abuse, so what is the jury to do but aquit the poor, abused woman? Sure, she pulled the trigger, but it was really HIS fault, the nasty, dirty Patriarchal Male. He got what She..er, HE deserved, the brute! No doubt about it, she was driven to it in a fit of desperation and in an effort to protect her children, an' all like that.
Reminds me of the crack about the Chilean dictator committing suicide by shooting himself in the back 21 times from a distance of 18 feet, stopping only twice to reload.
She kills him, it's his fault. Terrorist thinking - "Look what YOU made ME do! It's YOUR fault! I'M the Victim!" And it works, for a woman.
She is "innocent" of murder, or manslaughter. Maybe she could be accused of wanton destruction of property of destroying a useful government/house slave?
Face it, gentlemen - there are some places where being Male disqualifies one from any kind of citizenship or status, except "moving target".
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
by HombreVIII on 04:20 PM March 6th, 2006 EST (#9)
|
|
|
|
|
"Face it, gentlemen - there are some places where being Male disqualifies one from any kind of citizenship or status, except "moving target"."
By some places are you referring to all of planet Earth? Because if not, I'd like to know what places would be the exception.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
by TomP on 07:46 PM March 6th, 2006 EST (#10)
|
|
|
|
|
Well, shucks. If you are male, you are ALWAYS a "moving target", but there are some places where you can be considered an nth-class citizen (for large values of n). Not many, of course...
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
by Davidadelong on 08:00 PM March 6th, 2006 EST (#11)
|
|
|
|
|
Maybe that's why they want to colonize the moon! I am still trying to figure out where the "land of the free" is!
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
by Daoistfire on 07:24 AM March 7th, 2006 EST (#12)
|
|
|
|
|
The last "patriarch" country, China, is fallen to the Feminist.
Have fun
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
by Davidadelong on 06:20 PM March 8th, 2006 EST (#13)
|
|
|
|
|
Perhaps the Women that were pulling the strings all along just decided to step out from behind the curtain? Have fun? This is nothing less than a struggle for LIBERTY and FREEDOM of the Human Being, I don't suppose that I expect any fun!
|
|
|
|
|
[an error occurred while processing this directive]
|
Tirryb writes "