|
This discussion has been archived.
No new comments can be posted.
|
 |
|
 |
 |
by Davidadelong on 08:32 PM March 2nd, 2006 EST (#1)
|
|
 |
 |
 |
The Family made some very good points to the court. Notice how the judge was making excuses for this woman? At least the decision is being reviewed. The judge should be taken off the bench as well for being biased. You are supposed to be unbiased when you take the tax payers money for "handing out justice"! I do belive they take an oath, no? Violation of that oath is sufficient for removal, no? "It is a good day to die!"
|
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
 |
by Roy on 11:49 PM March 2nd, 2006 EST (#2)
|
|
 |
 |
 |
Note how the judge "reasoned" that this female sexual predator's public exposure and the resulting "shame" constituted a significant punishment?
When was the last time you read about a male sexual perp's sentence being suspended because he had already suffered too much "shame?"
This illustrates the true evil of Chivalry as a weapon used against men and as an alibi to excuse women.
|
|
 |
 |
|
 |
|
 |
 |
by Thundercloud on 01:56 PM March 5th, 2006 EST (#3)
|
|
 |
 |
 |
I know I'm running this saying into the ground but it NEEDS to be said here.
In cases like this always remember; "Men are demonized, women are diagnosed."
Thundercloud.
"Hoka hey!"
|
|
 |
 |
|
[an error occurred while processing this directive]