This discussion has been archived.
No new comments can be posted.
|
|
|
|
|
by Clancy
(chermanstovall@msn.com)
on 03:09 PM February 9th, 2006 EST (#1)
|
|
|
|
|
I read this yesterday from a different source. This one seems to have left out a couple of details. One, the boy said that he touched the girl because she touched him. Clearly, it's never too early to learn how to scream rape. Also, it failed to mention what else happened. My guess is the boy was a little bit more than bewildered, scared and intimidated. Wouldn't it make you cringe to hear a 6 year old boy ask "are the police coming?" I'll bet there was an investigation. They gave him a fair trial and then hung him with a new rope. Makes me want to slam my hand in the car door.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
by Clancy
(chermanstovall@msn.com)
on 04:23 PM February 9th, 2006 EST (#3)
|
|
|
|
|
That's what I get for skimming. Same article, same words. I'm repenting at leisure. It STILL pisses me off. "She said her son asked the principal if the police were going to come get him." I want to know, was the principle smiling when she heard this? Did her panties get moist at the sight of a terrified boy CHILD? Never mind that he said he was touced first. Boys lie, you know. Girls don't. My guess is Spanish Inquisition had nothing on their "investigation".
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
by robrob on 03:33 PM February 9th, 2006 EST (#2)
|
|
|
|
|
Sad as it is, at least one more American female (the mother) has learnt how harmful extreme feminism and the prevailing hyper PC climate can be when it's close to home.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
by MAUS on 05:50 PM February 9th, 2006 EST (#4)
|
|
|
|
|
You guys must be relative newbies. Were you not aware that there is already well established precedent jurisprudence wherein a newborn was tried in adult court for being born naked. There was of course the criminal proceedings but much worse was the gaggle of angry protestors when he was released, after serving his full term of 20 years, who immediately served process on him for the civil tort liability that there was in abayence....apparently the nurse attending at his birth was so traumatised by this sexual harassment that she was no longer able to give a bed bath.....you think I'm kidding don't you?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
by Thundercloud on 01:49 PM February 10th, 2006 EST (#5)
|
|
|
|
|
This whole fiasco is so dumb, it's unbelievable...
The boy is a CHILD, for crying out loud.
God, how feminism has ruined this country.
Thundercloud.
"Hoka hey!"
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
by al_nbd on 10:42 AM February 11th, 2006 EST (#6)
|
|
|
|
|
Crazy feminists who accused 6-yr boy in sexual harrasment were forced to bring their apologies:
http://www.cnn.com/2006/EDUCATION/02/11/sex.harras s.ap/index.html
If something like this happened to a girl, I'm sure that someone in that school would be put in jail or at least immediately fired. The psychological trauma caused by this incident definitely will be felt by the boy in the whole course of his life.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
by Luek on 12:08 PM February 11th, 2006 EST (#7)
|
|
|
|
|
http://www.cnn.com/2006/EDUCATION/02/11/sex.harras s.ap/index.html
The six year old boy who was traumatized by the schools rad-fem inspired misandric sexual harassment policy has been given an apology and at the parent's request transferred to another school.
The school officials also said they will review their bug brained sexual harassment policy so similar outrageous incidents will not happen in the future.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
by Roy on 03:09 PM February 11th, 2006 EST (#8)
|
|
|
|
|
This "good news" is precisely what academic administrations excel at --- i.e. protecting their own asses.
The best possible solution was to "transfer the problem" to another school district.
Now the feminazi principal will avoid a real public inquiry into her politics of boy-hating; the school board will squelch further discomfort from media scrutiny; the pervasive problems of anti-boy school environments will again be ignored away.
Everything has been "handled," yes?
All CLEANED UP.
The Matrix as usual?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
by Dittohd on 01:34 PM February 14th, 2006 EST (#10)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
[an error occurred while processing this directive]