[an error occurred while processing this directive]
"Just Another 12 Dead Men"
posted by Matt on 02:36 PM January 18th, 2006
Feature Submission Feature submission addressing the deaths of the 12 miners in West Virginia, and how they are part of a flood of largely unrecognized male victims of workplace accidents/violence.

Click "Read more..." to read this outstanding essay.


“Just Another 12 Dead Men”
by Mike Spaniola

Memorial services were held recently for the 12 men who died in West Virginia’s Sago Mine. The men died Jan. 2 after returning to the mine from the holiday break. An investigation continues to determine what went wrong.

The tragic death toll in the West Virginia mining accident is ironic. Every day of the year, an average of 12 men die in this country in work-related incidents [1](.pdf file). We are often reminded of the more than 2,000 deaths suffered by U.S. Armed Forces in the Afghanistan and Iraq. But each year, that grisly death toll is reached in the U.S. workplace by the end of May.

A majority of these deaths are white males and typically cut short the lives of the youngest men. (Women account for 8 percent of U.S. workplace deaths.) This annual workplace slaughter of men is ignored by media, making it a truly silent crisis.

Many initial media reports on the mining tragedy referred to the men only as “miners,” which is an odd twist for a media so otherwise gender-conscious. But when men die in war, they are merely “soldiers;” and when men die in construction accidents, they are merely “workers.”

In the article, “Dying at Work,” by Carrie Coolidge for Forbes.com [2], she lays out the statistics but never mentions that more than 90 percent of U.S. workplace deaths inconvenience men, and permanently so. Ms. Coolidge works for a business publication but seems unable to do the math or to discern a statistical omission.

While our country’s death toll from mining operations is regrettable, men elsewhere fare much worse. From 1992 through 2002, mining accidents killed 434 miners in the U.S. and a staggering 59,543 in China. Working hours and conditions in Chinese mines are debilitating, and holidays are rarely given. One survivor from a mining disaster in China’s Lianing province, where 220 men died in two days in February 2005, said he worked without stop for a year because “there is a great demand for coal in the country.” [3]

PC imagery vs. hard reality

When terrorists attacked the Twin Towers on Sept. 11, 2001, the politically correct term “firefighters” applied to dead firemen only. The New York City firefighter death toll from that horrendous day was: men 343, women 0. America as a gender-neutral society seems a swell idea until someone gets hurt.

But it’s an old story. Remember the Titanic? Ninety-four percent of those in first-class who survived and 81 percent of those in second-class were women. A modern take on the chivalrous phrase “women and children first” coincided with the release of the movie, Titanic. The joke was: “How long can a feminist hold her breath?”

According to the Bureau of Labor Statistics, 5,703 deaths occurred in the U.S. workplace in 2004, a 2 percent increase over 2003. Most of the deaths occurred mainly in construction, agriculture, transportation and law enforcement. In 2003, a total 5,129 men died on the job, an average of more than 12 male deaths every day, weekends and holidays included. More than 70 percent of those deaths were white males, ages 35 to 54. Hispanic men accounted for 15 percent of male workplace deaths that year and male African-American workers, 10 percent.

Ironically, the controversial “Violence Against Women Act” is based on making the workplace safer for women. When the multibillion-dollar VAWA was first passed in 1994 under President Bill Clinton, critics pointed out that relatively few women experienced job-related “assaults and violent acts,” a key category used in granting VAWA federal authority under the Commerce Act. In fact, only about 2 percent of all assaults and violent acts involved women. Incidents in this category include “violence by persons, self-inflicted injury and assaults by animals.” The figure remains nearly the same today.

Nonetheless, our federal legislators renewed VAWA late last year, and, in the process, condoned a millennia-old social norm: men are expendable. Yet imagine the reaction if one were to suggest affirmative action or a “Violence Against Men Act” to bring about true equality in the workplace?

Of course, men can only be victims of other men, and not societal injustice. A letter from a woman printed in the Houston Chronicle recently used the trite feminist excuse: Men have all the power; therefore, men are to blame for the miners’ deaths. Of course, if men had all the power, then women would work the coal mines.

Women consume a great deal more than they produce. Most retail stores -- 75 percent by one estimate -- cater to women and girls. Men largely build these stores and provide the raw materials and transportation for the goods, including the fuel, trucks and jets involved and maintenance of same.

The woman’s comments reflect the reprehensible politics of feminism, which encourage a primal narcissism among followers. And once having succumbed, they are incapable of acknowledging, let alone expressing gratitude, for the millennia of sacrifices made by men on behalf of women.

Mike Spaniola writes political commentary from high atop the Rocky Mountains in central Colorado. He seeks to counter the oxymoron known as mainstream media.

CBS/Tom Selleck promote more sexual violence vs. men | F4J Disbands After Blair Planned Kidnap Story  >

  
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
And ! (Score:1)
by Gang-banged on 07:34 PM January 18th, 2006 EST (#1)
(User #1714 Info)
And, if men have 'all' the power, why are male suicides at such a multiple of female suicide ?
Interesting to note.. (Score:1)
by Davidadelong on 11:40 PM January 18th, 2006 EST (#2)
In the media there is a big hullabalou about lobbyists buying politicians, a convenient way for one of the "two party system" to draw heat on the other. But, in actuallity we are being run by corporations. The description of the market place catering to Women, and Men doing the majority of the work, plays into "society" being made into mindless wage slaves and consumers. Empires being built off of the sweat and blood of the true commodaties, Human Beings. So what has changed since the beginning of recorded history? I hope the commodaties have changed, We The People, getting smarter, and realizing that there is much more important things in life than reaching for that "brass" ring. Because that ring is nothing more than a chain. What would happen if we all refused to play their game? It would be really interesting then wouldn't it? Just my opinion Folks.......
Re:Interesting to note.. (Score:1)
by khankrumthebulgar on 09:59 AM January 19th, 2006 EST (#3)
Sadly Men continue to labor and live shorter lives than Women. They work the most hazardous jobs for pay aka. The Glass Cellar jobs. Women benefit from the services and products created by this. Yet take no notice of the Men who die to maintain their lives. Underground Mining, High Rise Ironworkers, Logging, Fishing, are just a few of the high risk jobs Men do. Yet somehow we are Women's Oppressors. I would love to see Women have their own seperate culture minus the Males and see how long it would be sustainable.

The media also ignores the Suicide Epidemic in the US. Men in China live almost the same lifespan as Women there. Not here though. I am fed up with our culture and Men's Second Place Status.
Re:Interesting to note.. (Score:1)
by gatsby on 03:02 PM January 19th, 2006 EST (#4)
I feel your frustration. Because you can see injustice done institutionally and not just on individual cases, does not make us "woman hating" neanderthals. Any sensible person that looks at the situation with true objectivity can come to the same conclusion. The problem is that it has become almost impossible for any group to bring up these issues without appearing, (or being made to appear), as some sort of fanatical hate group.
Re:Interesting to note.. (Score:1)
by Davidadelong on 10:47 PM January 19th, 2006 EST (#5)
Yes, by speaking out on a regular basis one becomes a target. But, if one has the will to succeed, and the determination not to give them the satisfaction of proving themselves right, one can become a royal pain in the ass! Unfortunately it is an all consuming task, one that has actual little support from those around you. On the other hand, what better purpose than to try and make a better world for our progeny, not to mention for ourselves? Injustice has been institutionalized, so therefore we should be against the institution, no? "It is a good day to die!" By the way, the only thing that I really hate is lies, and injustice, and the pervayors of the same.
[an error occurred while processing this directive]