|
This discussion has been archived.
No new comments can be posted.
|
 |
|
|
|
by Davidadelong on 10:53 PM December 9th, 2005 EST (#1)
|
|
|
|
|
Whoever said a Man can't be nurturing? Whoever said a Man can't be gentle? Study the cultures of the world, and then try and come up with some demasculating theory to define them. We have been brainwashed into believing that Men can't have feelings, can't be sensitive, and can't raise Children. Now, to cover up the lies they come up with a "cool" name and site some "actors' that they feel People will relate to, and then give the credit to Women, by saying that Men are adopting feminine ways! It is still bullshit folks, why can't they tell the truth?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
There is nothing more repulsive than society defining what is masculine and what is not...shut up and let the man define it for himself!
Emmanuel Matteer Jr.
Emanslave@aol.com
*****MASCULISM IS A BLACK MALE'S BEST FRIEND!!!!!*****
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
by Davidadelong on 09:30 AM December 10th, 2005 EST (#3)
|
|
|
|
|
Most cultures have guidlines for both Male and Female behavior, and it varies from culture to culture. Usually those guidlines were originated by the People themselves. Now we have a system that endeavors to dictate how we behave for nothing more than control factors. My point is not far from yours, the People need to dictate to the system, not the other way around. Even as an individual we are still held accountable by our community.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
I am who I am and I am the only one who can define what it means to me being a man. I don't need validation from feminazis, I shit on their definitions of manhood. If they don't like that they can get acquainted with my boots.
Bert
--------------------
From now on, men's rights first.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
by Thundercloud on 04:21 PM December 10th, 2005 EST (#7)
|
|
|
|
|
Well said, Bert!
Oh, and "Emmanuel", It's good to see you back.
Thundercloud.
"Hoka hey!"
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
by Roy on 03:12 PM December 10th, 2005 EST (#5)
|
|
|
|
|
The author of this "study," Marion Salzman, was at least honest enough to state ---
"The job of understanding men was undertaken from the perspective of how we can do a better job marketing to them. I have no apologies for that motivation."
This is all you need to know about this quest for "nderstanding."
It all fits perfectly into the mainstream feminist ideology of manipulating, propagandizing, demonizing, and exploiting men.
To the extent that women wish to "understand" masculinity, it has always -- and will always ---be about power and control.
That women would even believe they have the authority to redefine masculinity is a sorry comment on how far our culture has been metrosexualized.
Time to re-read Dr. Freud's excellent insights about penis envy?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
by Thundercloud on 04:18 PM December 10th, 2005 EST (#6)
|
|
|
|
|
"Ubersexual", "Metrosexual".
Just two different names for the same thing; "Wussie-poopie".
Thundercloud.
"Hoka hey!"
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
by Roy on 10:09 PM December 11th, 2005 EST (#8)
|
|
|
|
|
You know what, T-Cloud?
If things keep going the way the gender wars dictate.... your term "Wussie-Poopie" could be very marketable.
It will refer to a man with the potential for having testicles.
A Wussie-Poopie may one day be the Terminator of the male species....
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
by Thundercloud on 02:39 PM December 12th, 2005 EST (#9)
|
|
|
|
|
Yep.
And that's why we MRAs must be the Terminators of the Terminators of the male species.
Thundercloud.
"Hoka hey!"
|
|
|
|
|
[an error occurred while processing this directive]
|
