|
This discussion has been archived.
No new comments can be posted.
|
 |
|
|
|
by Anonymous User on 12:56 PM November 20th, 2005 EST (#1)
|
|
|
|
|
who are they cheating with?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
by Anonymous User on 01:41 PM November 20th, 2005 EST (#2)
|
|
|
|
|
I am not so sure that's true. It seems that men and women cheat at about the same rates. There is also reporting lapses, ie, not everyone 'fesses up to it.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
by Tirryb on 09:08 PM November 20th, 2005 EST (#4)
|
|
|
|
|
"Who are they cheating with?"
In my experience, with un-married younger men. Or was that supposed to imply that men are MORE culpable than women..?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
by Anonymous User on 09:35 PM November 20th, 2005 EST (#5)
|
|
|
|
|
This is exactly the question. There are two answers I can think of:
1. There is one extremely busy woman out there.
2. Women lie massively about sex. (I'm beginning to see a pattern; Norma McCorvey of Roe v. Wade fame, Tailhook, the list goes on...)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
by Anonymous User on 12:20 PM November 21st, 2005 EST (#7)
|
|
|
|
|
I am left to wonder if perhaps women (these days) actually may be cheating MORE than men. But the media, in all their objectiveness (sarcasm) just aren't going to report THAT little doozy.
Thundercloud.
"Hoka hey!"
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
by Anonymous User on 03:16 PM November 21st, 2005 EST (#14)
|
|
|
|
|
...Again...;
Oh my god! They killed Kenny!
You Bastards!
Thundercloud.
"Hoka hey!"
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
by Tumescent on 06:41 PM November 20th, 2005 EST (#3)
|
|
|
|
|
.. but I noticed that MSN no longer has a "Womens" section. I'm not sure why they decided to change, but it doesn't really matter, most of their stories still seem to cater to womens'interests. Their approach is odd. I believe it remains true that a majority of computer and internet users are men, one would think that they would cater to men more than women...
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
by Anonymous User on 12:17 PM November 21st, 2005 EST (#6)
|
|
|
|
|
Yes. You'd think so, wouldn't you?
Go figure.
Thundercloud.
"Hoka hey!"
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
by Anonymous User on 04:34 PM November 21st, 2005 EST (#15)
|
|
|
|
|
It means the whole damn thing is a women's section.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
by Anonymous User on 06:05 PM November 21st, 2005 EST (#19)
|
|
|
|
|
Ugh. How pompous. Good, now I will put a filter on your name. Way to promote that fraternity we all need as men!
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
by unrulypassenger on 10:34 AM November 22nd, 2005 EST (#23)
|
|
|
|
|
>>>>"Because let's face it, marriage is an unnatural state."
So to is monogomy according to the current understandings of prominent Psychological Associations.
So, gentlemen...see why we lose our father's rights? We just aren't cut out for this crap. We ARENT. We aren't monogomous, we can't do it. We aren't family creatures, as hard as we try. Oh we can get married and try to cheat a little on the computer at night while the war department is upstairs asleep or jack off to cable movies and pretend everything is ok in the morning or stop by the titty bar on the way home and watch other people's wives and mothers spin around poles. But we are kidding ourselves. We lust in our hearts at the very least. We can't do this right. Look at the divorce rate. i think many of us get married just so we'll have a female to use for baby vending. Then when we're miserable a few years later, we don't understand why. Why don't we just accept that it's not right for us. i'm okay with truth. NO CAN DO.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
by unrulypassenger on 10:46 AM November 22nd, 2005 EST (#24)
|
|
|
|
|
i meant to add that if women are now cheating as much as we always have been, then maybe we're seeing the beginning of the end of the monogomous marital thing coming down the road. Otherwise this is a non- issue since we geve women permission to cheat when WE do. We kinda have to swallow this one. No biggie.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
by Anonymous User on 01:09 PM November 21st, 2005 EST (#9)
|
|
|
|
|
Every time this poster posts he/she/it (probably an "it" knowing feminists!) gets a clearly stated rebuttal.
--------------------------------------------
Whoever is writing these blurbs about the 19th amendment is probably a feminist, not a men’s rights activist.
They are employing a fairly simple strategy, “guerrilla tactics”. Basically, this individual is attempting to imply that repealing the right to vote is actually a goal of the men’s rights movement. This is totally bogus. By implying these false goals, the individual is transparently attempting to marginalize the movement.
How? By making the men’s movement seem very extreme, nobody will take it seriously and many will ignore its legitimate goals, which are:
- fairness in the family courts,
- criminalization of false accusations of child molestation/abuse (should lead to jail time, automatic loss of custody, and forfeiture of divorce settlements),
- criminalization of paternity fraud (a.k.a. “female rape”, must be severely punished),
- end of "victim" excuse for murder (like when women kill their husbands and/or children),
- end to preferential treatment of women in the work force (“affirmative action”; that is, discrimination against middle class men in the work force),
- end of insulting and derogatory images of men in the media and entertainment industry,
- end to anti-boy policies in the schools,
- the defeat of feminism,
- etc.
I’ve NEVER heard anybody seriously advocate eliminating women’s right to vote. Don’t fall for it folks!!!
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
by Anonymous User on 01:54 PM November 21st, 2005 EST (#11)
|
|
|
|
|
And since this has nothing to do with men's rights...;
Oh my god! You killed Kenny!
You Bastards!
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
by Anonymous User on 04:38 PM November 21st, 2005 EST (#16)
|
|
|
|
|
I totally disagree. Not all women vote with the feminazis, yet surprisingly, a lot of men do. This has got to change.
Once men realize they're getting totally screwed-over by the system, they'd vote accordingly. That is, they'd vote for fairness and justice, and their own self preservation. I think a lot of women would probably do the same (they’re not all twisted feminists, many have sons and husbands!).
This is a huge voting block. We just need to de-stigmatize men's rights. We can't be worried about being labeled or called names by feminists. They are the ones who are against justice now!
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
by Luek on 05:11 PM November 21st, 2005 EST (#17)
|
|
|
|
|
PLEASE DON'T FEED THE TROLLS!
THEY WILL CRAWL BACK UNDER THEIR ROCKS AND ROTTEN LOGS IF YOU DON'T FEED THEM!
SO PLEASE DON'T FEED THE TROLLS!
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
by Roy on 06:11 PM November 21st, 2005 EST (#20)
|
|
|
|
|
It's an interesting strategy ....
Use the anonymous entry vulnerability to "plant" ridiculous misogynist posts, then "expose" the site as a bunch of anti-women Neanderthals.
It may be time for MANN to review it's anonymous option...
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
by Anonymous User on 12:35 PM November 22nd, 2005 EST (#26)
|
|
|
|
|
well, if nothing else, perhaps the I.P. addresses of trolls should be banned.
In other words if you come here and troll the site and keep leaving stupid posts like: "ban the 19th amendment" and other such garbage eventually your I.P. is banned.
Thundercloud.
"Hoka hey!"
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
by Anonymous User on 12:32 PM November 22nd, 2005 EST (#25)
|
|
|
|
|
You mean you're that lady with snakes for hair and when someone looks at you they turn to stone?
Jeez, no wonder you're such a jerk.
Thundercloud.
"Hoka hey!"
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
by Anonymous User on 05:45 PM November 22nd, 2005 EST (#27)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mikeeusa:
If you are indeed a foe of feminism as you
purport to be, then why are you attempting to
damage, discredit and derail the men's movement by
making the kind of statements that you are
making on this web board?
I am neither endorsing nor condemming the ideas
which you have expressed. I am posing a simple
question. Why are you so friggin' STUPID?
At the very least (at least in theory), you would learn how to converse
elliptically and encryptically. Know what I'm saying?
I believe that you indeed ARE a feminist, despite what you appear to say.
-Fidelbogen-
|
|
|
|
|
[an error occurred while processing this directive]
Expecting the usual "it's all guys doing it" subtext, I was pleasantly surprised to read